Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 34
Filter
2.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 92(2): 136-42, 2000 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10639515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information on the costs of medical care for patients enrolled in clinical trials is needed by policymakers evaluating ways to facilitate clinical research in a managed care environment. We examined the direct costs of medical care for patients enrolled in cancer clinical trials at a large health maintenance organization (HMO). METHODS: Costs for 135 patients who entered 22 cancer clinical trials (including 12 breast cancer trials) at Kaiser Permanente in Northern California, from 1994 through 1996 were compared with costs for 135 matched control subjects who were not enrolled in such trials. Cancer registry data and medical charts were used in matching the control subjects to the trial enrollees with respect to cancer site, stage, date of diagnosis, age, sex, and trial eligibility. The direct costs of medical care were compared between trial enrollees and the control subjects for a 1-year period, with data on costs and utilization of services obtained from Kaiser Permanente databases and medical charts. RESULTS: Mean 1-year costs for the enrollees in trials were 10% higher than those for the control subjects ($17 003 per enrollee compared with $15 516 per control subject; two-sided P =.011). The primary component of this difference was a $1376 difference in chemotherapy costs ($4815 per trial enrollee versus $3439 per control subject; two-sided P<.001). Costs for the 11 enrollees in trials that had a bone marrow transplant (BMT) arm were approximately double the costs for their matched control subjects (borderline significance: two-sided P=.054). The $15 041 mean cost for the enrollees in trials without BMT was similar to the $15 186 mean cost for their matched control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: Participation in cancer clinical trials at a large HMO did not result in substantial increases in the direct costs of medical care.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Adult , Aged , California , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/therapy , Research Support as Topic , SEER Program , United States
3.
Health Serv Res ; 34(2): 525-46, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10357289

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare treatment patterns and the ten-year survival of prostate cancer patients in two large, nonprofit, group/staff HMOs to those of patients receiving care in the fee-for-service health setting. DATA SOURCES/STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of men age 65 and over diagnosed with prostate cancer between 1985 and the end of 1992 and followed through 1994. Subjects (n = 21,741) were ascertained by two population-based tumor registries covering the greater San Francisco-Oakland and Seattle-Puget Sound areas. Linkage of registry data with Medicare claims data and with HMO inpatient utilization data allowed the determination of health plan enrollment and the measurement of comorbid conditions. Multivariate regression models were used to examine HMO versus FFS treatment and survival differences adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among cases with non-metastatic prostate cancer, HMO patients were more likely than FFS patients to receive aggressive therapy (either prostatectomy or radiation) in San Francisco-Oakland (odds ratio [OR] = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.46-1.96) but not in Seattle (OR = 1.15, 0.93-1.43). Among men receiving aggressive therapy, HMO cases were three to five times more likely to receive radiation therapy than prostatectomy. Overall mortality was equivalent over ten years (HMO versus FFS mortality risk ratio [RR] = 1.01, 0.94-1.08), but prostate cancer mortality was higher for HMO cases than for FFS cases (RR = 1.25, 1.13-1.39). CONCLUSION: Despite marked treatment differences for clinically localized prostate cancer, overall ten-year survival for patients enrolled in two nonprofit group/staff HMOs was equivalent to survival among patients receiving care in the FFS setting, even after adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Similar overall but better prostate cancer-specific survival among FFS patients is most plausibly explained by differences between the HMO and FFS patients in both tumor characteristics and unmeasured patient selection factors.


Subject(s)
Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Aged , California/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medicare , Proportional Hazards Models , Quality of Health Care , Risk , Survival Analysis , United States , Washington/epidemiology
4.
Med Care Res Rev ; 56(2): 177-96, 1999 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10373723

ABSTRACT

The current study compares treatment use and long-term survival in colorectal cancer patients between Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in two large prepaid group/staff health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and the fee-for-service (FFS) setting. The study is based on 15,352 colorectal cancer cases diagnosed between 1985 and 1992 and followed through 1995. Survival differences between the HMO and FFS cases were assessed using Cox regression. Treatment differences were evaluated using logistic regression. HMO cases had a lower overall mortality than did FFS cases but not a significantly lower colorectal cancer-specific mortality. Use of surgical resection was similar between HMO and FFS cases. However, rectal cancer cases in the HMOs were more likely to receive postsurgical radiation therapy than FFS cases. Superior overall survival in the HMOs may be the result of increased colorectal cancer screening, greater use of adjuvant therapies, and selection of healthier individuals.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cohort Studies , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Female , Group Practice, Prepaid/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Research , Humans , Insurance Selection Bias , Logistic Models , Male , Medicare , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care , San Francisco/epidemiology , Survival Analysis , United States , Washington/epidemiology
5.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 20(1): 1-11, 1998 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9506249

ABSTRACT

This study was designed to develop and validate a new computerized version of the Symptom Driven Diagnostic System for Primary Care (SDDS-PC) and examine its feasibility in primary care practice. One thousand and one patients (ages 18-70) coming for routine care to Kaiser-Permanente were screened on a self-administered symptom scale for major depression, alcohol and drug dependence, generalized anxiety, panic and obsessive compulsive disorders, and suicidal behavior. The screen was followed up by a brief diagnostic interview, administered by a nurse, which yielded a one-page summary of positive symptoms and a provisional computer-generated diagnosis for the physician. The physician reviewed the summary results and made a diagnosis. The nurse and physician were blind to the screen results. Patients were reinterviewed within 96 hours by a mental health professional (MHP) blind to previous results. The nurses' interviews ranged between 1.5 and 3.5 minutes for a screened positive diagnosis. Agreement between the nurse and physician diagnoses was excellent to moderate. Disagreement was usually in the direction of the physician ruling out major mental disorders in favor of subsyndromal or medical explanations. Only rarely did physicians diagnose disorders not detected by the nurse interview. Agreement between physician and MHP was moderate. Physicians using the SDDS-PC seldom made diagnoses that were not confirmed by the independent assessment of the MHP. The SDDS-PC may facilitate recognition of psychiatric disorders and minimize the physician's time in information gathering.


Subject(s)
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Patient Care Team , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted/statistics & numerical data , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Observer Variation , Primary Health Care , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales/statistics & numerical data , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 30(7): 1741-50, 1997 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9385902

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction under varying assumptions about effectiveness, existing facilities and staffing and volume of services. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction has reduced mortality in some studies, but its actual effectiveness may vary, and most U.S. hospitals do not have cardiac catheterization laboratories. Projections of cost-effectiveness in various settings are needed for decisions about adoption. METHODS: We created a decision analytic model to compare three policies: primary angioplasty, intravenous thrombolysis and no intervention. Probabilities of health outcomes were taken from randomized trials (base case efficacy assumptions) and community-based studies (effectiveness assumptions). The base case analysis assumed that a hospital with an existing laboratory with night/weekend staffing coverage admitted 200 patients with a myocardial infarction annually. In alternative scenarios, a new laboratory was built, and its capacity for elective procedures was either 1) needed or 2) redundant with existing laboratories. RESULTS: Under base case efficacy assumptions, primary angioplasty resulted in cost savings compared with thrombolysis and had a cost of $12,000/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved compared with no intervention. In sensitivity analyses, when there was an existing cardiac catheterization laboratory at a hospital with > or = 200 patients with a myocardial infarction annually, primary angioplasty had a cost of < $30,000/QALY saved under a wide range of assumptions. However, the cost/QALY saved increased sharply under effectiveness assumptions when the hospital had < 150 patients with a myocardial infarction annually or when a redundant laboratory was built. CONCLUSIONS: At hospitals with an existing cardiac catheterization laboratory, primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction would be cost-effective relative to other medical interventions under a wide range of assumptions. The procedure's relative cost-ineffectiveness at low volumes or redundant laboratories supports regionalization of cardiac services in urban areas. However, approaches to overcoming competitive barriers and close monitoring of outcomes and costs will be needed.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/economics , Decision Support Techniques , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Catheterization , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans , Laboratories, Hospital , Thrombolytic Therapy/economics
7.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 89(22): 1683-91, 1997 Nov 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9390537

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Enrollment in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) has increased rapidly during the past 10 years, reflecting a growing emphasis on health care cost containment. To determine whether there is a difference in the treatment and outcome for female patients with breast cancer enrolled in HMOs versus a fee-for-service setting, we compared the 10-year survival and initial treatment of patients with breast cancer enrolled in both types of plans. METHODS: With the use of tumor registries covering the greater San Francisco-Oakland and Seattle-Puget Sound areas, respectively, we obtained information on the treatment and outcome for 13,358 female patients with breast cancer, aged 65 years and older, diagnosed between 1985 and 1992. We linked registry information with Medicare data and data from the two large HMOs included in the study. We compared the survival and treatment differences between HMO and fee-for-service care after adjusting for tumor stage, comorbidity, and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: In San Francisco-Oakland, the 10-year adjusted risk ratio for breast cancer deaths among HMO patients compared with fee-for-service patients was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59-0.87) and was comparable for all deaths. In Seattle-Puget Sound, the risk ratio for breast cancer deaths was 1.01 (95% CI = 0.77-1.33) but somewhat lower for all deaths. Women enrolled in HMOs were more likely to receive breast-conserving surgery than women in fee-for-service (odds ratio = 1.55 in San Francisco-Oakland; 3.39 in Seattle). HMO enrollees undergoing breast-conserving surgery were also more likely to receive adjuvant radiotherapy (San Francisco-Oakland odds ratio = 2.49; Seattle odds ratio = 4.62). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term survival outcomes in the two prepaid group practice HMOs in this study were at least equal to, and possibly better than, outcomes in the fee-for-service system. In addition, the use of recommended therapy for early stage breast cancer was more frequent in the two HMOs.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Fee-for-Service Plans , Health Maintenance Organizations , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , California/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Odds Ratio , Oregon/epidemiology , Risk , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
8.
Health Care Financ Rev ; 18(4): 51-76, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10175613

ABSTRACT

The direct costs of medical care for cancer are examined at Kaiser Permanente (KP) in Northern California. Use data from July 1987 through June 1991 were obtained from KP automated files for all 21,977 KP patients in the Bay Area SEER registry with cancer at one of seven cancer sites. Medical charts were reviewed for a stratified sample of 886 patients. Costs were estimated for initial, continuing, and terminal care, and for all person time within 15 years of diagnosis, by stage at diagnosis. From diagnosis until death or 15 years, long-term costs attributable to cancer were as follows: breast, $35,000; colon, $42,000; rectum, $51,000; lung, $33,000; ovarian, $64,000; prostate, $29,000; and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL), $48,000. The utilization and cost results reported here may be useful in assessing the cost-effectiveness of cancer prevention and control programs, in adjusting capitation rates and budgets, and in estimating the aggregate medical care costs attributable to cancer.


Subject(s)
Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , California , Demography , Hospitalization , Humans , Medical Audit , Neoplasms/classification , SEER Program , San Francisco
9.
J Am Geriatr Soc ; 45(6): 667-74, 1997 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9180658

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine overall and diagnosis-specific trends in the use of inpatient and outpatient medical services (1970-1988) among older members of a large HMO. DESIGN: Two cohorts of approximately 3000 persons aged 65 or older in 1971 and 1980 were compared for hospital and outpatient utilization during 9-year follow-up periods (1971-79 and 1980-88). All subjects were evaluated for vital status throughout the follow-up period as well. PARTICIPANTS: All 6057 subjects were members of the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in 1971 or 1980. The study sample was sex-age stratified (65-69,70-79,80+) at baseline. MEASUREMENTS: Data on demographics, outpatient health services utilization, categories of outpatient utilization and disease diagnoses were obtained from membership lists or medical chart review; inpatient utilization, including admitting and discharge diagnosis, length of stay, and number of hospital days was assessed from computerized hospitalization records. RESULTS: Hospital discharge rates (sex-age adjusted) increased by 12% between cohorts, with the largest increases at the oldest ages. There was a 25% increase among women and a 9% increase among men. Length of stay decreased by 20%. Hospitalization for ischemic heart disease decreased by 17%. Congestive heart failure (CHF) discharge rates (sex-age adjusted) were 92% higher in the 1980-88 cohort. For diagnoses related to nursing home institutionalization and frailty, discharge rates were significantly higher in the 1980-88 cohort: pneumonia (+34%), urinary tract infections (+104%), dehydration (+110%), osteoarthritis (+64%), syncope (+246%), leg cellulitis (+70%). In-hospital survival improved, but overall percent of readmissions also increased by 4%; readmissions for CHF increased by 13% and those for conditions of frailty by 120%. Overall outpatient visits increased by 17%. Use of laboratory tests (+57%) and outpatient surgeries (+99%) increased for all age strata in 1980-88 compared with 1971-79. CONCLUSIONS: While overall outpatient and inpatient utilization has largely decreased over the past 30 years, as a result of economic factors and improved treatments for some major diseases, there has been an increase in utilization among older people. Hospitalization for diagnoses associated with end-stage cardiovascular disease (CHF), musculoskeletal disease, frailty and iatrogenic aspects of institutionalization are clearly increasing substantially. The largest impact of aging on health care may be the result of institutionalization and its sequelae. Improved treatment for cardiovascular disease may also be leading to increased utilization at later stages in the disease process.


Subject(s)
Aging , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Chronic Disease , Health Maintenance Organizations , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Aged , California , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Male , Patient Admission , Retrospective Studies
10.
N Engl J Med ; 335(25): 1888-96, 1996 Dec 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8948565

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Wide geographic variation in the use of coronary angiography after myocardial infarction has been documented internationally and within the United States. An associated variation in clinical outcomes has not been consistently demonstrated. METHODS: We assessed the risk of death from heart disease and of any heart disease event (death, reinfarction, or rehospitalization) over a follow-up period of one to four years in 6851 patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction at 16 Kaiser Permanente hospitals from 1990 through 1992. The percentage of patients who underwent angiography within three months after infarction ranged from 30 to 77 percent. We selected a subcohort of 1109 patients from three hospitals with higher rates of angiography and four with lower rates for a record review to assess the severity of infarction, the number of coexisting conditions, treatments received, and the appropriateness and necessity of angiography, using established criteria. RESULTS: The rates of angiography were inversely related to the risk of death from heart disease (P= 0.03) and the risk of heart disease events (P<0.001) among the 16 hospitals after adjustment for age, sex, race, coexisting conditions, and the location of the infarction (subendocardial vs. transmural). In the subcohort, 440 patients met criteria indicating that angiography was necessary and 669 did not. Among the former, patients treated at hospitals with higher rates of angiography had a lower risk of death and of any heart disease event than those treated at hospitals with lower rates (hazard ratios, 0.67 and 0.72, respectively). Among the latter, the apparent benefits of being treated at hospitals with higher angiography rates were smaller (hazard ratios, 0.85 to 0.90 for death and any heart disease event, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: During the one to four years after myocardial infarction, patients treated at hospitals with higher rates of angiography had more favorable outcomes than those treated at hospitals with lower rates. This association was stronger among patients for whom published criteria indicated that angiography was necessary.


Subject(s)
Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Heart Diseases/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Aged , California , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk
11.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 28(4): 882-9, 1996 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8837564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the initial economic cost of primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction under varying assumptions about whether a cardiac catheterization laboratory exists, whether services are provided during night and weekend hours and how cardiovascular surgical backup is arranged. BACKGROUND: Primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction has resulted in clinical outcomes superior or equal to those obtained with thrombolysis in recent studies, but its future implementation depends greatly on its cost and cost-effectiveness. There is a gap in knowledge about the true economic costs of this procedure, and understanding costs under a variety of hypothetic scenarios is important in planning whether and how the procedure should be offered to broad groups of patients. METHODS: A generalizable spreadsheet model was constructed to calculate the cost of primary angioplasty at a single hospital with assumptions based on data from a large nonprofit health maintenance organization (Kaiser Permanente). The following baseline assumptions were made: 1) A total of 200 patients with myocardial infarction presented to the hospital each year; 2) primary angioplasty was offered for 10 years; 3) the hospital had a cardiac catheterization laboratory; 4) costs of night call for technical personnel and cardiovascular surgical backup were already covered. Other scenarios were modeled to represent different assumptions about existing resources. RESULTS: Under the baseline assumptions, primary angioplasty cost $1,597/procedure. If night call for technical personnel were a new expense, the average cost would be > or = $3,206. If a new cardiac catheterization laboratory needed to be built, costs would range from $3,866 to $14,339/procedure, depending on how cardiovascular surgical backup was provided. Results were sensitive to assumptions about the annual volume of myocardial infarctions, the number of years the procedure was offered and the costs of labor, construction and equipment. CONCLUSIONS: The initial cost of providing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction varies greatly, depending on the setting in which it is provided. To provide information for clinical policy decisions, a cost-effectiveness model is needed that combines these initial costs with data on survival, quality of life and rates and costs of subsequent cardiac procedures.


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/economics , Models, Economic , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , California , Costs and Cost Analysis , Decision Making , Health Maintenance Organizations , Humans , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Sensitivity and Specificity
12.
Ann Epidemiol ; 6(4): 348-56, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8876846

ABSTRACT

This study compared the age-specific incidence, postdiagnostic survival, and mortality for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in two cohorts of people aged 65 years and older. All subjects were members of a large prepaid health maintenance organization. The influence of changes in CVD risk factors on these rates also was evaluated. Trends in prevalence, incidence, postdiagnostic survival, and mortality for CVD were examined in both cohorts in 1971 and 1980. Myocardial infarction (MI), angina pectoris, stroke, and congestive heart failure (CHF) were included as CVD outcomes in this analysis. Nine-year prospective data on these diagnoses were abstracted from medical records and computerized hospitalization records for both cohorts. Age-sex-adjusted cardiovascular mortality was lower for both sexes by approximately 20% in the 1980 cohort. Overall survival did not change, whereas cancer mortality increased by 76% in women and 36% in men. With the exception of stroke, there was no increase in age-adjusted or age-specific prevalence. In men, the age-adjusted prevalence of stroke in men was 24% higher in the 1980 cohort. Age-adjusted 9-year incidence of MI, angina pectoris, stroke, and CHF did not change between cohorts in either sex Postdiagnostic, age-adjusted mortality for men with incident stroke was 24% lower in the 1980 cohort, and Postdiagnostic, age-adjusted mortality for men with incident angina was 35% lower in the 1980 cohort. Adjustment for risk factors measured at or before baseline had little influence on cohort differences in CVD incidence or duration of survival after CVD diagnosis. This study confirms other research showing a decline in CVD mortality over the past 20 years. These findings suggest that prevalent angina pectoris is increasing in men, and that survival with stroke and with angina is improving in men. Later diagnosis of incident CHF in men suggests that prevention and early detection may be postponing the development of more serious disease.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analysis of Variance , California/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cohort Effect , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity/trends , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Incidence , Logistic Models , Male , Odds Ratio , Prevalence , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sampling Studies , Sex Distribution , Smoking/epidemiology
13.
J Gen Intern Med ; 11(7): 426-30, 1996 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8842936

ABSTRACT

We evaluated a set of diagnostic screens for mental disorders in primary care. A self-administered screening questionnaire containing 26 items testing for multiple mental disorders was completed by 1,001 patients. Brief diagnostic modules, structured for psychiatric diagnoses, were subsequently administered to each patient by a research nurse. Operating characteristics of the screens were as follows: alcohol dependence (sensitivity [SE] 0.75; positive predictive value [PPV] 0.58; [kappa] 0.63), drug dependence (SE 0.50; PPV 0.50; kappa 0.50), generalized anxiety disorder (SE 0.74; PPV 0.44; kappa 0.44), major depressive disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.52; kappa 0.50), obsessive compulsive disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.15; kappa 0.21), and panic disorder (SE 0.71; PPV 0.43; kappa 0.48). Other chance-corrected measures of agreement are also reported, and criterion validity of the screens is examined. The results provide evidence that the screens discriminate between patients with symptomatology meeting established diagnostic criteria and those without. They detected previously unrecognized cases in this study and may prove to be valuable tools for psychiatric diagnosis in primary care.


Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Primary Health Care , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/physiopathology , Methods , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results , Sampling Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
JAMA ; 275(21): 1672-4, 1996 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8637142

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of Bordetella pertussis infection among adults who have prolonged cough for 2 weeks or longer and to estimate the incidence of B pertussis infection in adults in a defined urban population. DESIGN: A prospective clinical study. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco (Calif) Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-three referred and participating health plan members 18 years old or older with the complaint of cough persisting for 2 weeks or longer and 154 health plan members 18 years old or older with no cough for the past 3 months (controls) were enrolled. Medical records for an additional 100 patients randomly sampled from 676 patients 18 years old or older with an ambulatory diagnosis of cough (60 with prolonged cough) were also reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of adult pertussis as determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay IgG antibody levels to pertussis toxin in individuals with prolonged cough for 2 weeks or longer and the incidence of adult pertussis in San Francisco Kaiser health plan members. RESULTS: The prevalence of adult pertussis was 12.4% of the participating referrals. The incidence of adult pertussis was estimated to be 176 cases per 100 000 person-years (95% confidence interval, 97 to 255 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Adult pertussis is a significantly greater public health threat than previously suspected. Booster doses of acellular pertussis vaccine after 7 years of age may be an effective approach to minimize transmission and infection.


Subject(s)
Pertussis Toxin , Virulence Factors, Bordetella/immunology , Whooping Cough/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Incidence , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Urban Population/statistics & numerical data , Whooping Cough/diagnosis
15.
N Engl J Med ; 334(10): 635-41, 1996 Mar 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8592528

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Use of the emergency department for nonemergency care is frequent and costly. We studied the effect of a copayment on emergency department use in a group-model health maintenance organization (HMO). METHODS: We examined the use of the emergency department in 1992 and 1993 by 30,276 subjects who ranged in age from 1 to 63 years at the start of the study and belonged to the Kaiser Permanente HMO in northern California. We assessed their use of various HMO services and their clinical outcomes before and after the introduction of a copayment of $25 to $35 for using the emergency department. This copayment group was compared with two randomly selected control groups not affected by the copayment. One control group, with 60,408 members, was matched for age, sex, and area of residence to the copayment group. The second, with 37,539 members, was matched for these factors and also for the type of employer. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and use of the emergency department in 1992, the decline in the number of visits in 1993 was 14.6 percentage points greater in the copayment group than in either control group (P<0.001 for each comparison). Visits for urgent care did not increase among subjects in any stratum defined by age and sex, and neither did the number of outpatient visits by adults and children. The decline in emergency visits for presenting conditions classified as "always an emergency" was small and not significant. For conditions classified as "often an emergency". "sometimes not an emergency", or "often not an emergency", the declines in the use of the emergency department were larger and statistically significant, and they increased with decreasing severity of the presenting condition. Although our ability to detect any adverse effects of the copayment was limited, there was no suggestion of excess adverse events in the copayment group, such as increases in mortality or in the number of potentially avoidable hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: Among members of an HMO, the introduction of a small copayment for the use of the emergency department was associated with a decline of about 15 percent in the use of that department, mostly among patients with conditions considered likely not to present an emergency.


Subject(s)
Cost Sharing , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/organization & administration , Health Services Research/methods , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Socioeconomic Factors
16.
Acad Emerg Med ; 3(2): 106-13, 1996 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8808369

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of an alcohol-related ED visit with medical care utilization during a two-year period surrounding the ED visit in an HMO. METHODS: A probability sample of ED patients were interviewed and underwent breath analysis in a large HMO in a Northern California county. Based on recent alcohol intake or documentation of an alcohol-related ED visit, the patients were assigned to an alcohol group (n = 91) or a non-alcohol group (n = 897). A 10% random sample of the health plan membership of the same county (n = 19,968) served as a comparison group. Utilization data were obtained from computerized files. Multiple linear regression was used to determine differences in subsequent outpatient visit rates between the alcohol and the non-alcohol groups. Logistic regression was used to compare the risks of hospitalization in the two groups. RESULTS: Annual outpatient visit rates were 7.8 in the alcohol group and 8.3 in the non-alcohol group (p = 0.65), controlling for gender, age, and injury status, and were significantly different from the visit rate of 5.5 for the random health plan sample (p = 0.0001). No difference was found between the alcohol and the non-alcohol groups for risk of hospitalization; however, those in the health plan sample were less than half as likely to be hospitalized as were those in the non-alcohol group (odds ratio 0.44, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: No difference was found in utilization of medical services between the alcohol and the non-alcohol groups in this predominantly white, well-educated HMO ED population. However, both groups used significantly more inpatient and outpatient services than did the general HMO membership.


Subject(s)
Alcoholic Intoxication/therapy , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , California , Cohort Studies , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Outpatients , Probability , Sampling Studies , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
17.
Kidney Int ; 44(3): 638-42, 1993 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8231039

ABSTRACT

Patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) are believed to be at increased risk of atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease (CHD), although existing evidence for this association has not been persuasive. The risk of CHD among 142 persons with NS documented by protein-uria > or = 3.5 g daily was compared with that among 142 matched controls randomly selected from the membership of a large Northern California health plan. Controls were matched for sex, year of birth, and presence in the health plan when the referent case was diagnosed. No diabetics were included in this study. Mean follow-up for nonfatal CHD events was 5.6 years for NS subjects and 11.2 years for controls. Among the NS subjects myocardial infarction (MI) developed in 11, and there were 58 deaths, seven because of CHD. Among the controls, there were four MIs and 10 deaths, three because of CHD. In matched-pair analysis, there were 11 MIs among NS subjects and none among controls [P = 0.001, lower bound of 95% confidence interval for relative risk (CI), 2.8]. In an unmatched analysis adjusted for hypertension and smoking at diagnosis of NS, the relative risk of MI was 5.5 (95% CI 1.6 to 18.3) and the relative risk of coronary death was 2.8 (95% CI 0.7 to 11.3). Omitting data of NS subjects with minimal change disease and systemic lupus erythematosus yielded similar results. These data suggest that persons with NS are at increased risk of CHD.


Subject(s)
Coronary Disease/etiology , Nephrotic Syndrome/complications , Adolescent , Adult , Coronary Disease/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/etiology , North Carolina/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
18.
Med Care ; 30(9): 855-65, 1992 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1518317

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to determine whether a hypertension management program in which patients monitor their own blood pressure (BP) at home can reduce costs without compromising BP control. The prospective, randomized, controlled 1-year clinical trial was conducted at four medical centers of the Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program in the San Francisco Bay Area. Of 467 patients with uncomplicated hypertension who were referred by their physicians, 37 declined to participate in the study; 215 were randomly assigned to a Usual Care (UC) group and 215 to a Home BP group. Twenty-five UC patients and 15 Home BP patients did not return for year-end BP measurements. Patients in the UC group were referred back to their physicians. Patients in the Home BP group were trained to measure their own BP and return the readings by mail. Patients were given a standard procedure to follow in case of unusually high or low BP readings at home. The number and type of outpatient medical services used were obtained from patient medical records for the study year and the prior year. Costs of care for hypertension were calculated by assigning relative value units to each outpatient service. Trained technicians measured each patient's BP at entry into the study and 1 year later. Home BP patients made 1.2 fewer hypertension-related office visits than UC patients during the study year (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8, 1.7). Mean adjusted cost for physician visits, telephone calls, and laboratory tests associated with hypertension care was $88.76 per patient per year in the Home BP group, 29% less than in the UC group (95% CI: $16.11, $54.74). The annualized cost of implementing the home BP system was approximately $28 per patient during the study year and would currently be approximately $15. After 1 year, BP control in men in the Home BP group was better than in men in the UC group; BP control was equally good in women in both groups. Management of uncomplicated hypertension based on periodic home BP reports can achieve BP control with fewer physician visits, resulting in substantial cost savings.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination/economics , Blood Pressure Monitors , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Hypertension/prevention & control , Self Care/economics , Adult , Attitude of Health Personnel , California , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Health Services/economics , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Patient Satisfaction , Physicians , Prospective Studies , Regression Analysis , San Francisco , Self Care/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telephone
20.
Am J Epidemiol ; 133(4): 376-80, 1991 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1994701

ABSTRACT

A previous report that the leukocyte count was related to mortality from cancer was evaluated in two large groups of multiphasic health examinees in the San Francisco Bay area, California--a cohort of about 25,000 persons followed up for mortality and a cohort of about 160,000 persons followed up for cancer incidence between 1964 and 1980. The leukocyte count was related to mortality from all cancers, smoking-related cancers, and cancers that were not smoking-related, but it was not related to cancer mortality in nonsmokers. The leukocyte count showed an association with the incidence of smoking-related cancers that was only partially removed by analytical control for smoking. It was only slightly, if at all, related to the incidence of not-smoking-related cancers and to the incidence of all cancers among nonsmokers. The relation of the leukocyte count to cancer mortality appears to be due to its close association with cigarette smoking, which raises the incidence of certain cancers and can hasten death attributed to cancer.


Subject(s)
Leukocyte Count , Neoplasms/mortality , Cause of Death , Cohort Studies , Humans , Male , San Francisco
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...