Investigating the impact of a national educational program on patient adherence to osteoporosis medications.

Interrupted time series analysis (ITS) measured improvements in osteoporosis medication adherence after a national education program. The proportion of patients who were adherent to treatment increased following the program. INTRODUCTION: The NPS MedicineWise osteoporosis program, implemented nationally in 2015-2016 in Australia, sought to improve adherence to osteoporosis medicines using evidence-based multifaceted large-scale educational interventions targeting general practitioners. METHODS: We undertook a retrospective, observational study using ITS analysis from 1 December 2011 to 31 December 2019 using a 10% sample of Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) dispensing data for 71,093 patients ≥ 45 years. The adherence measure was the percentage of patients with a proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 80%. RESULTS: The program significantly increased adherence to osteoporosis medicines. After 12 months, the estimated adherence rate with the program was 48.4% (95% CI, 47.4-49.4%). Without the program, adherence would have fallen to 43.5% (95% CI, 42.5-44.5%). There was a further increase in adherence by the end of the study period (44 months after the program). Among patients prescribed denosumab only, despite a significant increase in adherence following the program, adherence rates were overall sub-optimal (65.0% 12 months following the program). CONCLUSIONS: The NPS MedicineWise osteoporosis program significantly increased osteoporosis medicine adherence. The program changed primary care prescriber behavior and improved treatment adherence. However, some patients had a period of treatment discontinuation, placing them at increased risk of fracture. A focused program emphasizing the importance of long-term adherence with denosumab (including switching to bisphosphonates if treatment is discontinued) may be warranted to further improve the quality use of osteoporosis treatment in Australia.

Strategies to reduce diagnostic errors: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effectiveness of audit and communication strategies to reduce diagnostic errors made by clinicians. METHODS: MEDLINE complete, CINHAL complete, EMBASE, PSNet and Google Advanced. Electronic and manual search of articles on audit systems and communication strategies or interventions, searched for papers published between January 1990 and April 2017. We included studies with interventions implemented by clinicians in a clinical environment with real patients. RESULTS: A total of 2431 articles were screened of which 26 studies met inclusion criteria. Data extraction was conducted by two groups, each group comprising two independent reviewers. Articles were classified by communication (6) or audit strategies (20) to reduce diagnostic error in clinical settings. The most common interventions were delivered as technology-based systems n = 16 (62%) and within an acute care setting n = 15 (57%). Nine studies reported randomised controlled trials. Three RCT studies on communication interventions and 3 RCTs on audit strategies found the interventions to be effective in reducing diagnostic errors. CONCLUSION: Despite numerous studies on interventions targeting diagnostic errors, our analyses revealed limited evidence on interventions being practically used in clinical settings and a bias of studies originating from the US (n = 19, 73% of included studies). There is some evidence that trigger algorithms, including computer based and alert systems, may reduce delayed diagnosis and improve diagnostic accuracy. In trauma settings, strategies such as additional patient review (e.g. trauma teams) reduced missed diagnosis and in radiology departments review strategies such as team meetings and error documentation may reduce diagnostic error rates over time. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The systematic review was registered in the PROSPERO database under registration number CRD42017067056 .