ABSTRACT
Carcinoid tumours are rare neuroendocrine neoplasms that mostly occur in younger adults with low tendencies to metastasise. Based on their histological characteristics, they are divided into typical and atypical subtypes. The most common presenting symptoms are due to central airway obstruction. The first step in the diagnostic assessment should be a computed tomography (CT) scan, as it provides information both for local tumour extent and lymph node involvement. Bronchoscopy is the main tool for histological confirmation, evaluation of bronchial wall invasion and removal of endobronchial manifestation with subsequent resolution of atelectasis. Endobronchial ultrasound may be necessary to rule out lymph node metastasis. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in combination with CT can rule out further metastatic disease.Surgical resection using parenchyma-sparing techniques remains the gold standard for treatment. For selected patients, endobronchial therapy could be an alternative for minimal invasiveness. Long-term follow-up is suggested due to the high likelihood of recurrence.Here, we describe our clinical experience in a 35-year-old male patient who originally presented with haemoptysis and a central polypoid tumour in the left main bronchus revealed by a CT scan. The histological characteristics were indicative of a typical carcinoid. The patient was treated using an endobronchial approach only. No complications and no recurrences have been observed in a follow-up of 2â years.
Subject(s)
Bronchial Neoplasms , Carcinoid Tumor , Adult , Bronchi , Bronchial Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Bronchial Neoplasms/surgery , Bronchoscopy , Carcinoid Tumor/surgery , Carcinoid Tumor/therapy , Humans , Male , PneumonectomyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prolonged alveolar-pleural air leaks are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic valve therapy has been recently introduced as a potential less invasive treatment option. We aimed at quantifying the effects of valve therapy on air leak flow and clinical outcomes in patients with prolonged air leaks. METHODS: We report on a series of 16 patients with high comorbidity and evidence of continuous air leak flow in whom chest tubes remained in place for at least 7 days. After identification of the source of the air leak by use of the balloon occlusion technique, endobronchial one-way valves were implanted. Digital chest tube monitoring was used to assess air leak flow before, during, and after valve implantation until chest tube removal. RESULTS: The source of the air leak was endoscopically identified in 13 patients (81%). After valve implantation, air leak flow decreased significantly from 871±551 mL/min to 61±72 mL/min immediately after the intervention (p<0.001). The mean duration of chest tube drainage was 18±8 days before and 9±6 days after the intervention (p<0.01). Ten patients were considered responders, and 3 patients were nonresponders. Responders demonstrated consistent air leak flow levels below 100 mL/min until chest tube removal. Long-term follow-up was available for 9 patients. No adverse events related to the valve implants were reported at follow-up. Seven patients underwent valve removal without any further complications. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic implantation of one-way valves leads to a significant reduction in air leakage flow and may thus be a valuable treatment option in patients with prolonged air leakage.