A GATA-dependent right ventricular enhancer controls dHAND transcription in the developing heart.

Heart formation in vertebrates is believed to occur in a segmental fashion, with discreet populations of cardiac progenitors giving rise to different chambers of the heart. However, the mechanisms involved in specification of different chamber lineages are unclear. The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor dHAND is expressed in cardiac precursors throughout the cardiac crescent and the linear heart tube, before becoming restricted to the right ventricular chamber at the onset of looping morphogenesis. dHAND is also expressed in the branchial arch neural crest, which contributes to craniofacial structures and the aortic arch arteries. Using a series of dHAND-lacZ reporter genes in transgenic mice, we show that cardiac and neural crest expression of dHAND are controlled by separate upstream enhancers and we describe a composite cardiac-specific enhancer that directs lacZ expression in a pattern that mimics that of the endogenous dHAND gene throughout heart development. Deletion analysis reduced this enhancer to a 1.5 kb region and identified subregions responsible for expression in the right ventricle and cardiac outflow tract. Comparison of mouse regulatory elements required for right ventricular expression to the human dHAND upstream sequence revealed two conserved consensus sites for binding of GATA transcription factors. Mutation of these sites abolished transgene expression in the right ventricle, identifying dHAND as a direct transcriptional target of GATA factors during right ventricle development. Since GATA factors are not chamber-restricted, these findings suggest the existence of positive and/or negative coregulators that cooperate with GATA factors to control right ventricular-specific gene expression in the developing heart.

The basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors dHAND and eHAND exhibit dimerization characteristics that suggest complex regulation of function.

dHAND and eHAND are basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors expressed during embryogenesis and are required for the proper development of cardiac and extraembryonic tissues. HAND genes, like the myogenic bHLH genes, are classified as class B bHLH genes, which are expressed in a tissue-restricted pattern and function by forming heterodimers with class A bHLH proteins. Myogenic bHLH genes are shown not to form homodimers efficiently, suggesting that their activity is dependent on their E-protein partners. To identify HIPs (HAND-interacting proteins) that regulate the activity of the HAND genes, we screened an 9.5-10.5-day-old mouse embryonic yeast two-hybrid library with eHAND. Several HIPs held high sequence identity to eHAND, indicating that eHAND could form and function as a homodimer. Based on the high degree of amino acid identity between eHAND and dHAND, it is possible that dHAND could also form homodimers and heterodimers with eHAND. We show using yeast and mammalian two-hybrid assays as well as biochemical pull-down assays that eHAND and dHAND are capable of forming both HAND homo- and heterodimers in vivo. To investigate whether HAND genes form heterodimers with other biologically relevant bHLH proteins, we tested and show HAND heterodimerization with the recently identified Hairy-related transcription factors, HRT1-3. This finding is exciting, because both HRT and HAND genes are coexpressed in the developing heart and limb and both have been implicated in establishing tissue boundaries and pattern formation. Moreover, competition gel shift analysis demonstrates that dHAND and eHAND can negatively regulate the DNA binding of MyoD/E12 heterodimers in a manner similar to MISTI and Id proteins, suggesting a possible transcriptional inhibitory role for HAND genes. Taken together, these results show that dHAND and eHAND can form homo- and heterodimer combinations with multiple bHLH partners and that this broad dimerization profile reflects the mechanisms by which HAND genes regulate transcription.

A comparative molecular analysis of four rat smooth muscle cell lines.

Transcriptional regulation of smooth muscle cell (SMC) differentiation is a rapidly growing area of interest that has relevance for understanding intimal disease. Despite the wealth of data accumulating in vitro, however, no study has compared the cell-specific marker profile, transfectability, promoter activity, and growth characteristics among several SMC culture systems. Accordingly, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the marker profile, growth properties, transfectability, and SMC promoter activity in four rat SMC lines (A7r5, adult and pup aortic, and PAC1). Despite alterations in chromosomal number and structure, A7r5, adult aortic, and PAC1 cells express all SMC markers studied including SM alpha-actin, SM calponin, SM22, tropoelastin, and to a lesser extent, SM myosin heavy chain (SMMHC). In contrast, pup aortic cells express very low or undetectable levels of all the above markers except tropoelastin. Adult aortic, pup, and PAC1 cells display similar growth curves and levels of proto-oncogene transcripts, whereas those in the A7r5 line are comparatively less. All cell lines studied except pup cells show expression of SMC differentiation genes during active growth, indicating that growth and differentiation are not mutually exclusive in cultured smooth muscle. Transfection studies reveal dramatic differences in DNA uptake and SMC-restricted promoter activity between cell lines. Collectively, these results provide detailed information relating to SMC molecular biology in culture that should facilitate the selection of a cell line for studying the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms underlying SMC differentiation.

Heart and extra-embryonic mesodermal defects in mouse embryos lacking the bHLH transcription factor Hand1.

The basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, Hand1 and Hand2 (refs 1,2), also called eHand/Hxt/Thing1 and dHand/Hed/Thing2 (refs 3,4), respectively, are expressed in the heart and certain neural-crest derivatives during embryogenesis. In addition, Hand1 is expressed in extraembryonic membranes, whereas Hand2 is expressed in the deciduum. Previous studies have demonstrated that Hand2 is required for formation of the right ventricle of the heart and the aortic arch arteries. We have generated a germline mutation in the mouse Hand1 gene by replacing the first coding exon with a beta-galactosidase reporter gene. Embryos homozygous for the Hand1 null allele died between embryonic days 8.5 and 9.5 and exhibited yolk sac abnormalities due to a deficiency in extraembryonic mesoderm. Heart development was also perturbed and did not progress beyond the cardiac-looping stage. Our results demonstrate important roles for Hand1 in extraembryonic mesodermal and heart development.

Modular regulation of muscle gene transcription: a mechanism for muscle cell diversity.

Skeletal, cardiac and smooth muscle cells express overlapping sets of muscle-specific genes, such that some muscle genes are expressed in only a single muscle cell lineages. Recent studies in transgenic mice have revealed that, in many cases, multiple, independent cis-regulatory regions, or modules, are required to direct the complete developmental pattern of expression of individual muscle-specific genes, even within a single muscle cell type. The temporospatial specificity of these myogenic regulatory modules is established by unique combinations of transcription factors and has revealed unanticipated diversity in the regulatory programs that control muscle gene expression. This type of composite regulation of muscle gene expression appears to reflect a general strategy for the control of cell-specific gene expression.

MEF2B is a potent transactivator expressed in early myogenic lineages.

There are four members of the myocyte enhancer binding factor 2 (MEF2) family of transcription factors, MEF2A, -B, -C, and -D, that have homology within an amino-terminal MADS box and an adjacent MEF2 domain that together mediate dimerization and DNA binding. MEF2A, -C, and -D have previously been shown to bind an A/T-rich DNA sequence in the control regions of numerous muscle-specific genes, whereas MEF2B was reported to be unable to bind this sequence unless the carboxyl terminus was deleted. To further define the functions of MEF2B, we analyzed its DNA binding and transcriptional activities. In contrast to previous studies, our results show that MEF2B binds the same DNA sequence as other members of the MEF2 family and acts as a strong transactivator through that sequence. Transcriptional activation by MEF2B is dependent on the carboxyl terminus, which contains two conserved sequence motifs found in all vertebrate MEF2 factors. During mouse embryogenesis, MEF2B transcripts are expressed in the developing cardiac and skeletal muscle lineages in a temporospatial pattern distinct from but overlapping with those of the other Mef2 genes. The mouse Mef2b gene maps to chromosome 8 and is unlinked to other Mef2 genes; its intron-exon organization is similar to that of the other vertebrate Mef2 genes and the single Drosophila Mef2 gene, consistent with the notion that these different Mef2 genes evolved from a common ancestral gene.

Myocyte enhancer binding factor-2 expression and activity in vascular smooth muscle cells. Association with the activated phenotype.

Proliferation and phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells (SMCs) are major components of the vessel's response to injury in experimental models of restenosis. Some of the growth factors involved in restenosis have been identified, but to date little is known about the transcription factors that ultimately regulate this process. We examined the expression of the four members of the myocyte enhancer binding factor-2 (MEF2) family of transcription factors in cultured rat aortic SMCs (RASMCs) and a rat model of restenosis because of their known importance in regulating the differentiated phenotype of skeletal and cardiac muscle. In skeletal and cardiac muscle, the MEF2s are believed to be important for activating the expression of contractile protein and other muscle-specific genes. Therefore, we anticipated that the MEF2s would be expressed at high levels in medial SMCs that are producing contractile proteins and that they would be downregulated along with the contractile protein genes in neointimal SMCs. On the contrary, we observe that MEF2A, MEF2B, and MEF2D mRNAs are upregulated in the neointima, with the highest levels in the layer of cells nearest to the lumen, whereas MEF2C mRNA levels do not appreciably increase. Moreover, few cells in the media are making MEF2 proteins detectable by immunohistochemistry, whereas large numbers of neointimal cells are positive for all four MEF2s. These data suggest that the MEF2s are involved in the activated smooth muscle phenotype and not in the maintenance of contractile protein gene expression.

Restricted expression of homeobox genes distinguishes fetal from adult human smooth muscle cells.

Smooth muscle cell plasticity is considered a prerequisite for atherosclerosis and restenosis following angioplasty and bypass surgery. Identification of transcription factors that specify one smooth muscle cell phenotype over another therefore may be of major importance in understanding the molecular basis of these vascular disorders. Homeobox genes exemplify one class of transcription factors that could govern smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity. Accordingly, we screened adult and fetal human smooth muscle cell cDNA libraries with a degenerate oligonucleotide corresponding to a highly conserved region of the homeodomain with the idea that homeobox genes, if present, would display a smooth muscle cell phenotype-dependent pattern of expression. No homeobox genes were detected in the adult human smooth muscle cell library; however, five nonparalogous homeobox genes were uncovered from the fetal library (HoxA5, HoxA11, HoxB1, HoxB7, and HoxC9). Northern blotting of adult and fetal tissues revealed low and restricted expression of all five homeobox genes. No significant differences in transcripts of HoxA5, HoxA11, and HoxB1 were detected between adult or fetal human smooth muscle cells in culture. HoxB7 and HoxC9, however, showed preferential mRNA expression in fetal human smooth muscle cells that appeared to correlate with the age of the donor. This phenotype-dependent expression of homeobox genes was also noted in rat pup versus adult smooth muscle cells. While similar differences in gene expression have been reported between subsets of smooth muscle cells from rat vessels of different-aged animals or clones of rat smooth muscle, our findings represent a demonstration of a transcription factor distinguishing two human smooth muscle cell phenotypes.

D-MEF2: a MADS box transcription factor expressed in differentiating mesoderm and muscle cell lineages during Drosophila embryogenesis.

The myocyte enhancer factor (MEF) 2 family of transcription factors has been implicated in the regulation of muscle transcription in vertebrates. We have cloned a protein from Drosophila, termed D-MEF2, that shares extensive amino acid homology with the MADS (MCM1, Agamous, Deficiens, and serum-response factor) domains of the vertebrate MEF2 proteins. D-mef2 gene expression is first detected during Drosophila embryogenesis within mesodermal precursor cells prior to specification of the somatic and visceral muscle lineages. Expression of D-mef2 is dependent on the mesodermal determinants twist and snail but independent of the homeobox-containing gene tinman, which is required for visceral muscle and heart development. D-mef2 expression precedes that of the MyoD homologue, nautilus, and, in contrast to nautilus, D-mef2 appears to be expressed in all somatic and visceral muscle cell precursors. Its temporal and spatial expression patterns suggest that D-mef2 may play an important role in commitment of mesoderm to myogenic lineages.

Triplex forming ability of a c-myc promoter element predicts promoter strength.

Most transcription factors are believed to bind promoter elements in the B-DNA conformation, wherein linear sequence determines specificity. However, there are promoter elements that can form complex structures such as intramolecular triplexes, and these structures may participate in the activity of these promoter elements. We have previously shown that a c-myc promoter element, termed the nuclease-sensitive element or NSE, can form tandem intramolecular triplexes of the H-DNA type and has a repeating sequence motif (ACCCTCCCC)4. The NSE was mutated and examined for transcriptional activity and for intra- and intermolecular triplex forming ability. The transcriptional activity of mutant NSEs can be predicted by the element's ability to form H-DNA and not by repeat number, position, or the number of mutant base pairs. DNA may therefore be a dynamic participant in the transcription of the c-myc gene.

The identification of a tandem H-DNA structure in the c-myc nuclease sensitive promoter element.

Previous studies have shown that the c-myc nuclease sensitive element (NSE) is capable of forming H-DNA in vitro. The NSE sequence exhibits strong purine/pyrimidine strand asymmetry. To study the NSE further, we have isolated the element from other c-myc sequences and have shown that the NSE alone is sufficient for the formation of H-DNA in supercoiled plasmids. We also show that the NSE forms a complex structure containing both H-y3 and H-y5 H-DNA. We term this structure tandem H-DNA.

Ribonucleoprotein and protein factors bind to an H-DNA-forming c-myc DNA element: possible regulators of the c-myc gene.

We have located a positive, cis-acting DNA sequence element within the 5' flanking DNA of the c-myc gene (-125 base pairs). This DNA sequence element has a large purine-pyrimidine strand asymmetry and can assume the H-DNA conformation. A factor with the properties of a ribonucleoprotein (RNP) interacts with this DNA region. The interaction of the c-myc DNA sequence element and the RNP involves an RNase H-sensitive mechanism and, therefore, may involve an RNA.DNA hybrid. In addition, a protein factor(s) binds to this DNA sequence element. DNA footprinting and mutant oligonucleotide binding/competition assays implicate a punctate, poly(G.C) recognition/binding sequence for the RNP factor, whereas the major protein factor requires two ACCCT sequence motifs for maximal binding. These results suggest that RNP and protein factors act as positive transcriptional regulators of the c-myc gene, perhaps by altering DNA topology.