Silicon-Rhodamine Functionalized Evocalcet Probes Potently and Selectively Label Calcium Sensing Receptors In Vitro, In Vivo, and Ex Vivo.

The calcium sensing receptor (CaSR) is a ubiquitously expressed G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) that regulates extracellular calcium signals via the parathyroid glands. CaSR has recently also been implicated in noncalcitropic pathophysiologies like asthma, gut inflammation, and cancer. To date, molecular tools that enable the bioimaging of CaSR in tissues are lacking. Based on in silico analyses of available structure-activity relationship data on CaSR ligands, we designed and prepared silicon-rhodamine (SiR) conjugates of the clinically approved drug evocalcet. The new probes EvoSiR4 and EvoSiR6, with differing linker lengths at the evocalcet carboxyl end, both showed a 6-fold and 3-fold increase in potency toward CaSR (EC50 < 45 nM) compared to evocalcet and the evocalcet-linker conjugate, respectively, in an FLIPR-based cellular functional assay. The specificity of the EvoSiR probes toward CaSR binding and the impact of albumin was evaluated in live cell experiments. Both probes showed strong albumin binding, which facilitated the clearance of nonspecific binding interactions. Accordingly, in zebrafish embryos, EvoSiR4 specifically labeled the high CaSR expressing neuromasts of the lateral line in vivo. EvoSiR4 was also assessed in human parathyroid tissues ex vivo, showing a specific absolute CaSR-associated fluorescence compared to that of parathyroid autofluorescence. In summary, functionalization of evocalcet by SiR led to the preparation of potent and specific fluorescent CaSR probes. EvoSiR4 is a versatile small-molecular probe that can be employed in CaSR-related biomedical analyses where antibodies are not applicable.

Fully automated sequential immunofluorescence (seqIF) for hyperplex spatial proteomics.

Tissues are complex environments where different cell types are in constant interaction with each other and with non-cellular components. Preserving the spatial context during proteomics analyses of tissue samples has become an important objective for different applications, one of the most important being the investigation of the tumor microenvironment. Here, we describe a multiplexed protein biomarker detection method on the COMET instrument, coined sequential ImmunoFluorescence (seqIF). The fully automated method uses successive applications of antibody incubation and elution, and in-situ imaging enabled by an integrated microscope and a microfluidic chip that provides optimized optical access to the sample. We show seqIF data on different sample types such as tumor and healthy tissue, including 40-plex on a single tissue section that is obtained in less than 24 h, using off-the-shelf antibodies. We also present extensive characterization of the developed method, including elution efficiency, epitope stability, repeatability and reproducibility, signal uniformity, and dynamic range, in addition to marker and panel optimization strategies. The streamlined workflow using off-the-shelf antibodies, data quality enabling downstream analysis, and ease of reaching hyperplex levels make seqIF suitable for immune-oncology research and other disciplines requiring spatial analysis, paving the way for its adoption in clinical settings.

Diabetes Healthcare Professionals Use Multiple Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Indicators to Assess Glucose Management.

BACKGROUND: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) offers multiple data features that can be leveraged to assess glucose management. However, how diabetes healthcare professionals (HCPs) actually assess CGM data and the extent to which they agree in assessing glycemic management are not well understood. METHODS: We asked HCPs to assess ten de-identified CGM datasets (each spanning seven days) and rank order each day by relative glycemic management (from "best" to "worst"). We also asked HCPs to endorse features of CGM data that were important in making such assessments. RESULTS: In the study, 57 HCPs (29 endocrinologists; 28 diabetes educators) participated. Hypoglycemia and glycemic variance were endorsed by nearly all HCPs to be important (91% and 88%, respectively). Time in range and daily lows and highs were endorsed more frequently by educators (all Ps < .05). On average, HCPs endorsed 3.7 of eight data features. Overall, HCPs demonstrated agreement in ranking days by relative glycemic control (Kendall's W = .52, P < .001). Rankings were similar between endocrinologists and educators (R2 = .90, Cohen's kappa = .95, mean absolute error = .4 [all Ps < .05]; Mann-Whitney U = 41, P = .53). CONCLUSIONS: Consensus in the endorsement of certain data features and agreement in assessing glycemic management were observed. While some practice-specific differences in feature endorsement were found, no differences between educators and endocrinologists were observed in assessing glycemic management. Overall, HCPs tended to consider CGM data holistically, in alignment with published recommendations, and made converging assessments regardless of practice.

Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: results of the first randomized treat-to-target study.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of a device that combines an insulin pump with real-time continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), compared to using an insulin pump with standard blood glucose monitoring systems. METHODS: This 6-month, randomized, multicenter, treat-to-target study enrolled 146 subjects treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion between the ages of 12 and 72 years with type 1 diabetes and initial A1C levels of >or=7.5%. Subjects were randomized to pump therapy with real-time CGM (sensor group [SG]) or to pump therapy and self-monitoring of blood glucose only (control group [CG]). Clinical effectiveness and safety were evaluated. RESULTS: A1C levels decreased (P<0.001) from baseline (8.44+/-0.70%) in both groups (SG, -0.71+/-0.71%; CG, -0.56+/-0.072%); however, between-group differences did not achieve significance. SG subjects showed no change in mean hypoglycemia area under the curve (AUC), whereas CG subjects showed an increase (P=0.001) in hypoglycemia AUC during the blinded periods of the study. The between-group difference in hypoglycemia AUC was significant (P<0.0002). Greater than 60% sensor utilization was associated with A1C reduction (P=0.0456). Fourteen severe hypoglycemic events occurred (11 in the SG group and three in the CG group, P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: A1C reduction was no different between the two groups. Subjects in the CG group had increased hypoglycemia AUC and number of events during blinded CGM use; however, there was no increase in hypoglycemia AUC or number of events in the SG group. Subjects with greater sensor utilization showed a greater improvement in A1C levels.

United States patient preference and usability for the new disposable insulin device Solostar versus other disposable pens.

The uptake of insulin pen use has been slow in the United States, despite their advantages over the vial/ syringe. We present results of a United States subset of 150 patients with type 1/type 2 diabetes, who were enrolled in an open-label study, that assessed usability, pen features, and patient preferences for four prefilled insulin pens: SoloSTAR, FlexPen, Lilly disposable pen, and a prototype, Pen X. Overall, the SoloSTAR and FlexPen were more user-friendly; 95 and 88% of patients, respectively, completed the steps correctly (without safety/attach-needle step-deemed independent of device) versus the Lilly disposable pen (60%) and Pen X (61%; all p < 0.05). The SoloSTAR was rated highest most frequently for pen feature comparisons. Results suggest that the SoloSTAR and FlexPen could potentially facilitate insulin use in the United States.

Comparison of the steady-state pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and variability of a transdermal testosterone patch versus a transdermal testosterone gel in hypogonadal men.

AIM: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), metabolism, intra- and inter-subject variability of a permeation-enhanced testosterone patch versus a topical testosterone gel. METHODS: 28 hypogonadal men were treated with a testosterone patch (5 mg/day applied at 2200 h) and a 1% testosterone gel (5 g/day applied at 0800 h; nominal delivery 5 mg/day), each for 14 days, in an open-label crossover design. PK profiles of total testosterone (TT) and calculated free testosterone (cFT) were measured on day 7 and day 14 of each treatment, with patches or gel applied to the abdomen; dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and estradiol (E2) profiles were measured on day 14. The time-average (Cavg), maximum (Cmax), time of maximum (Tmax) and minimum concentrations (Cmin) were derived from each profile. The intra- and inter-subject coefficients of variation (CVintra and CVinter) of the TT and cFT parameters were computed by ANOVA. RESULTS: Nightly applications of the patch produced a mean TT profile that mimicked the circadian pattern of healthy men. Morning applications of the gel produced a flatter mean profile; though individual subjects exhibited significant peaks at variable times. For TT, the mean and 90% confidence intervals of the patch/gel ratio of Cavg (1.030; 0.936-1.133; P > 0.05) and Cmax (1.086; 0.974-1.211; P > 0.05) met the criteria for bioequivalence. Cmin was lower for the patch. DHT levels and DHT/T ratios were 2 to 3-fold higher for the gel (P < 0.0001). E2 levels and E2/T ratios were comparable. CVintra and CVinter for Tmax approached 100% for the gel and were 23% and 42%, respectively, for the patch (P < 0.0001). Other variability parameters were generally comparable. Both products were well tolerated, and the patches adhered well. CONCLUSIONS: These findings reflect the different mechanisms of transdermal absorption from the patch and gel and provide new considerations for selecting testosterone replacement therapies in hypogonadal men.

Transfer of transdermally applied testosterone to clothing: a comparison of a testosterone patch versus a testosterone gel.

AIM: To assess the amount of testosterone transferred from the abdominal application sites of a transdermal testosterone patch and a transdermal testosterone gel to cotton T-shirts worn for 24 hours during each treatment. METHODS: During a crossover study comparing the pharmacokinetics of a testosterone patch versus a testosterone gel in 28 hypogonadal men, subjects wore fresh cotton T-shirts for 24 hours on the seventh and fourteenth days of each treatment and during a 24-hour baseline period. At the end of each evaluation, the abdominal section of the shirt was carefully cut out, extracted in alcohol, and analyzed for testosterone by a direct radioimmunoassay. The minimum quantifiable amount of testosterone was 0.03 microg per T-shirt sample. RESULTS: The median amounts of extracted testosterone were 0.44 microg for the baseline samples, 25.4 microg for the average of the two patch samples, and 6,762.7 microg for the average of the two gel samples (all comparisons P < 0.0001). Significant correlations were observed between the day 7 and day 14 data for both the patch (R = 0.4982; P < 0.01) and the gel (R = 0.8383; P < 0.0001). No significant correlations were found between the baseline, patch, or gel data, or between these and any demographic or pharmacokinetic parameters. A quantitative interpretation of the findings suggests that the baseline results are consistent with the transfer of testosterone in sweat; the patch results are probably due to the transfer of a small amount of residual testosterone left on the abdominal skin from the prior day's patches; and the gel results reflect the desquamation of stratum corneum containing a portion of the abdominally applied testosterone. CONCLUSIONS: There are large differences in the amount of testosterone that can be transferred from the application sites of transdermal patches and gels. The latter should be covered with clothing to minimize transfer through intimate skin-to-skin contact.

The impact of insulin glargine on clinical and humanistic outcomes in patients uncontrolled on other insulin and oral agents: an office-based naturalistic study.

OBJECTIVE: Controlling blood glucose levels in patients with diabetes often requires aggressive treatment, which may in turn cause hypoglycemia and/or decreased health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Insulin glargine, a long-acting insulin, has shown benefits of decreased nocturnal hypoglycemia without significant weight gain, while providing good glycemic control in clinical trials. These benefits have often been reported in studies of less than 1 year duration. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of insulin glargine over a 12-month period in a clinical practice setting, and measure its effects on HRQOL in a subset of patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with diabetes in a large private endocrinology practice were initiated on insulin glargine. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: the first group included patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D, n = 135); the second group included patients with type 2 diabetes previously on insulin and/or oral agents (T2D, n = 180). The HRQOL subset analysis included 50 patients from the above study. Patients completed a 40-item questionnaire adapted from the Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R) and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) at weeks 0, 2, 6, 12, and 16. RESULTS: Patients in both cohorts experienced statistically significant decreases in mean ( +/- SD) A1C: group T1D, -0.28 +/- 1.47 (P = 0.0307); group T2D, -0.60 +/- 1.51 (P < 0.0001), with no significant changes in body mass index. In the year following insulin glargine therapy, there were significantly fewer hypoglycemic events per patient than in the year prior to insulin glargine therapy (group T1D: -0.33, P = 0.002; group T2D: -0.20, P = 0.004). HRQOL subset analysis also revealed a significant decrease in A1C (P < 0.0001) after 16 weeks of therapy with insulin glargine. In this subset of patients, there was a significant improvement in overall well being (P = 0.0019), emotional well being (P = 0.003), total symptom scores (P < 0.0001), and total symptom distress (P < 0.0001). The limitations of the study are those inherently associated with naturalistic observational studies such as recall bias and compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin glargine use over a 12-month period in a clinical practice setting was shown to significantly improve A1C without adversely impacting weight or the occurrence of hypoglycemia. Significant improvements were also observed in HRQOL.

Vardenafil, a new phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, in the treatment of erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes: a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled fixed-dose study.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of vardenafil treatment for erectile dysfunction (ED) in men with diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this prospective multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled fixed-dose parallel-group phase III trial, 452 patients with diabetes (type 1 or type 2) and ED were randomized to take 10 or 20 mg vardenafil or placebo as needed for 12 weeks. Efficacy responses were assessed by International Index of Erectile Function domain scores, rates of vaginal penetration and successful intercourse, and a global assessment question (GAQ) about erection improvement during the previous 4 weeks. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, a dose-dependent (P = 0.02) improvement in erections was noted for the GAQ, with 57 and 72% of men taking 10 mg or 20 mg vardenafil, respectively, reporting improved erections, in contrast to 13% after taking placebo (P < 0.0001). For the erectile function domain, dose-dependent (P = 0.03) final scores for the 10- and 20-mg dose were 17.1 and 19.0 compared with 12.6 for placebo (P < 0.0001). Both vardenafil doses significantly enhanced the rates of successful penetration (P < 0.0001) and successful intercourse (P < 0.0001) compared with placebo. Vardenafil treatment was effective in increasing intercourse success rates at all levels of baseline ED severity, at each level of plasma HbA(1c), and for type 1 and 2 diabetes. Treatment-emergent adverse events were primarily mild to moderate headache (