Is This Organ Donor Safe?: Donor-Derived Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Infection is an inevitable complication of solid organ transplantation. Unrecognized infection may be transmitted from a donor and result in disseminated disease in the immunosuppressed host. Recent outbreaks of deceased donor-derived infections resulting in high rates of mortality and severe morbidity have emphasized the need to be cautious in using donors with possible meningoencephalitis. Screening of organ donors for potential transmissible infections is paramount to improving transplantation outcomes.

Is This Organ Donor Safe?: Donor-Derived Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Infection is an inevitable complication of solid organ transplantation. Unrecognized infection may be transmitted from a donor and result in disseminated disease in the immunosuppressed host. Recent outbreaks of deceased donor-derived infections resulting in high rates of mortality and severe morbidity have emphasized the need to be cautious in using donors with possible meningoencephalitis. Screening of organ donors for potential transmissible infections is paramount to improving transplantation outcomes.

Resident duty hours: a survey of internal medicine program directors.

INTRODUCTION: In 2011, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) implemented new Common Program Requirements to regulate duty hours of resident physicians, with three goals: improved patient safety, quality of resident education and quality of life for trainees. We sought to assess Internal Medicine program director (IMPD) perceptions of the 2011 Common Program Requirements in July 2012, one year following implementation of the new standards. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of all IMPDs at ACGME-accredited programs in the United States (N = 381) was performed using a 32-question, self-administered survey. Contact information was identified for 323 IMPDs. Three individualized emails were sent to each director over a 6-week period, requesting participation in the survey. Outcomes measured included approval of duty hours regulations, as well as perceptions of changes in graduate medical education and patient care resulting from the revised ACGME standards. RESULTS: A total of 237 surveys were returned (73% response rate). More than half of the IMPDs (52%) reported "overall" approval of the 2011 duty hour regulations, with greater than 70% approval of all individual regulations except senior resident daily duty periods (49% approval) and 16-hour intern shifts (17% approval). Although a majority feel resident quality of life has improved (55%), most IMPDs believe that resident education (60%) is worse. A minority report that quality (8%) or safety (11%) of patient care has improved. CONCLUSION: One year after implementation of new ACGME duty hour requirements, IMPDs report overall approval of the standards, but strong disapproval of 16-hour shift limits for interns. Few program directors perceive that the duty hour restrictions have resulted in better care for patients or education of residents. Although resident quality of life seems improved, most IMPDs report that their own workload has increased. Based on these results, the intended benefits of duty hour regulations may not yet have been realized.

Fungal osteomyelitis and septic arthritis.

Management of fungal osteomyelitis and fungal septic arthritis is challenging, especially in the setting of immunodeficiency and conditions that require immunosuppression. Because fungal osteomyelitis and fungal septic arthritis are rare conditions, study of their pathophysiology and treatment has been limited. In the literature, evidence-based treatment is lacking and, historically, outcomes have been poor. The most common offending organisms are Candida and Aspergillus, which are widely distributed in humans and soil. However, some fungal pathogens, such as Histoplasma, Blastomyces, Coccidioides, Cryptococcus, and Sporothrix, have more focal areas of endemicity. Fungal bone and joint infections result from direct inoculation, contiguous infection spread, or hematogenous seeding of organisms. These infections may be difficult to diagnose and eradicate, especially in the setting of total joint arthroplasty. Although there is no clear consensus on treatment, guidelines are available for management of many of these pathogens.

The impact of 2011 duty hours requirements on family medicine residents.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to determine family medicine residents' perception of changes in education, patient care, and quality of life following implementation of the 2011 Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Common Program Requirements. METHODS: Designated institutional officials at all 682 ACGME-accredited institutions were contacted and asked to distribute an anonymous, electronic survey to all residents at each sponsoring institution. The survey was administered to 2,956 family medicine residents at 61 institutions between December 2011 and February 2012. RESULTS: A large, demographically representative sample of residents (n=928) was identified as training in family medicine. Nearly half of residents (47.4%) reported disapproval of the duty hour requirements, with less than a quarter reporting approval (24.6%). Only quality of life for interns was identified as improved by a majority of respondents (63.3%). Meanwhile, quality of life for senior residents was generally reported as worse (53.0%). Likewise, a plurality of respondents stated that both quality of resident education (43.4%) and work schedules (47.9%) were negatively impacted, while more than half (56.5%) reported that preparation for more senior roles was worse. Aspects felt to be unchanged included amount of rest (45.4%) and hours worked by residents (52.8%). Although most respondents (52.0%) felt that safety of care was unchanged, more (77.9%) reported an increase in hand-offs and no increase in the availability of supervision (72.2%). Finally, the majority of residents (68.5%) agreed that there has been a shift of junior level responsibilities to more senior residents. CONCLUSIONS: It appears that family medicine residents generally disapprove of the 2011 ACGME duty hour regulations. They report negative consequences including a shift of intern responsibility to senior residents, as well as decreased preparedness for more senior roles. Further, patient safety, availability of supervision, and quality of education seem to be unimproved or worse.

Hospitalized Patients' Perceptions of Resident Fatigue, Duty Hours, and Continuity of Care.

BACKGROUND: Physicians' perceptions of duty hour regulations have been closely examined, yet patient opinions have been largely unstudied to date. OBJECTIVE: We studied patient perceptions of residency duty hours, fatigue, and continuity of care following implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education 2011 Common Program Requirements. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was administered between June and August 2013 to inpatients at a large academic medical center and an affiliated community hospital. Adult inpatients on teaching medical and surgical services were eligible for inclusion in the study. RESULTS: Survey response rate was 71.3% (513 of 720). Most respondents (57.1%, 293 of 513) believed residents should not be assigned to shifts longer than 12 hours, and nearly half (49.7%, 255 of 513) wanted to be notified if a resident caring for them had worked longer than 12 hours. Most patients (63.2%, 324 of 513) believed medical errors commonly occurred because of fatigue, and fewer (37.4%, 192 of 513; odds ratio, 0.56; P < .01) believed medical errors commonly occurred as a result of transfers of care. Given the choice between a familiar physician who "may be tired from a long shift" or a "fresh" physician who had received sign-out, more patients chose the fresh but unfamiliar physician (57.1% [293 of 513] versus 42.7% [219 of 513], P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: In a survey about physician attributes relevant to medical errors and patient safety, adult inpatients in a large and diverse sample reported greater concern about fatigue and working hours than about continuity of care.

The Current State of United States Spine Surgery Training: A Survey of Residency and Spine Fellowship Program Directors.

STUDY DESIGN: Program director survey. OBJECTIVES: To collect data on spine surgical experience during orthopedic and neurological surgery residency and assess the opinions of program directors (PDs) from orthopedic and neurological surgery residencies and spine surgery fellowships regarding current spine surgical training in the United States. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Current training for spine surgeons in the United States consists of a residency in either orthopedic or neurological surgery followed by an optional spine surgery fellowship. Program director survey data may assist in efforts to improve contemporary spine training. METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to all PDs of orthopedic and neurological surgery residencies and spine fellowships in the United States (N = 382). A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess attitudinal questions. A 2-tailed independent-samples t test was used to compare responses to each question independently. RESULTS: A total of 147 PDs completed the survey. Orthopedic PDs most commonly indicated that their residents participate in 76 to 150 spine cases during residency, whereas neurological surgery PDs most often reported more than 450 spine cases during residency (p < .0001). Over 88% of orthopedic surgery program directors and 0% of neurological surgery PDs recommended that their trainees complete a fellowship if they wish to perform community spine surgery (p < .001). In contrast, 98.1% of orthopedic PDs and 86.4% of neurological surgery PDs recommended that their trainees complete a fellowship if they wish to perform spinal deformity surgery (p = .038). Most PDs agreed that surgical simulation and competency-based training could improve spine surgery training (76% and 72%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study examined the opinions of orthopedic and neurological surgery residency and spine fellowship PDs regarding current spine surgery training in the United States. A large majority of PDs thought that both orthopedic and neurological surgical trainees should complete a fellowship if they plan to perform spinal deformity surgery. These results provide a background for further efforts to optimize contemporary spine surgical training.

Approval and perceived impact of duty hour regulations: survey of pediatric program directors.

OBJECTIVES: To determine pediatric program director (PD) approval and perception of changes to resident training and patient care resulting from 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Common Program Requirements. METHODS: All US pediatric PDs (n = 181) were identified from the ACGME. Functional e-mail addresses were identified for 164 (90.6%). Three individualized e-mail requests were sent to each PD to complete an anonymous 32-question Web-based survey. RESULTS: A total of 151 responses were obtained (83.4%). Pediatrics PDs reported approval for nearly all of the 2011 ACGME duty hour regulations except for 16-hour intern shift limits (72.2% disapprove). Regarding the perceived impact of the new standards, many areas were reportedly unchanged, but most PDs reported negative effects on resident education (74.7%), preparation for senior roles (79.9%), resident ownership of patients (76.8%), and continuity of care (78.8%). There was a reported increase in PD workload (67.6%) and use of physician extenders (62.7%). Finally, only 48.3% of PDs reported that their residents are "always" compliant with 2011 requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric PDs think there have been numerous negative consequences of the 2011 Common Program Requirements. These include declines in resident education and preparation to take on more senior roles, as well as diminished resident accountability and continuity of care. Although they support individual aspects of duty hour regulation, almost three-quarters of pediatric PDs say there should be fewer regulations. The opinions expressed by PDs in this study should prompt research using quantitative metrics to assess the true impact of duty hour regulations.

Critical analysis of a trauma fellowship-modeled, six-year orthopaedic surgery training program.

BACKGROUND: Work-hour restrictions and increased supervision requirements have altered the clinical experience of orthopaedic surgery residents, while the specialty's body of knowledge and requisite skill set continue to expand. This dilemma means that the duration and practice experience of the traditional orthopaedic residency may not meet the needs of today's trainees. For the past eighteen years, however, residency training in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at Brown University has included a mandatory postgraduate year six (PGY6) trauma fellowship-modeled year, during which trainees are conferred full staff admitting and operating privileges, with time allotted for completing research. They are supervised by senior attending staff, with increasing autonomy as the year progresses. A formal, critical analysis of this transition-to-practice training model in orthopaedics has not previously been described. METHODS: An anonymous thirty-one-item questionnaire was distributed to all practicing graduates of the six-year Brown University Orthopaedic Surgery training program (n = 69). A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess attitudinal questions. An independent-sample t test was used to compare the responses of pre-duty-hour trainees with those of post-duty-hour trainees, with a p value of <0.05 utilized for significance. RESULTS: All sixty-nine practicing graduates of the Brown University PGY6 trauma fellowship completed the survey (100% response rate). Most graduates (78.2%) would choose to complete the PGY6 year if they had to do residency again, and 72.4% would recommend trauma fellowship-modeled training to residents beginning their training. Trainees who completed residency during or after the imposed 2003 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education duty-hour restrictions (79.3%) were significantly more likely (p = 0.014) to rank the PGY6 year as their most valuable training year compared with trainees who completed residency prior to duty-hour restrictions (50.0%). Nearly half of the graduates (46.4%) thought that the PGY6 fellowship year was financially burdensome. CONCLUSIONS: The unique trauma fellowship-modeled sixth year of orthopaedic surgery training at Brown University was thought to be a valuable training experience by a large majority of graduates, although nearly half thought that the year was financially burdensome. These data suggest that a trauma fellowship-based sixth year of independent yet structured training has the potential to enhance orthopaedic education and could become an alternative standard given the current requirements imposed upon surgical residency training. These results may help guide further discussion among orthopaedic training programs to determine the optimal model for orthopaedic residency education in the twenty-first century.

Paperwork versus patient care: a nationwide survey of residents' perceptions of clinical documentation requirements and patient care.

BACKGROUND: The current health care system requires a substantial amount of documentation by physicians, potentially limiting time spent on patient care. OBJECTIVE: We sought to explore trainees' perceptions of their clinical documentation requirements and the relationship between time spent on clinical documentation versus time available for patient care. METHODS: An anonymous, online survey was sent to trainees in all postgraduate years of training and specialties in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited programs. RESULTS: Over a 2-month time frame, 1515 trainees in 24 specialties completed the survey. Most (92%) reported that documentation obligations are excessive, that time spent with patients has been compromised by this (90%), and that the amount of clinical documentation has had a negative effect on patient care (73%). Most residents and fellows reported feeling rushed and frustrated because of these documentation demands. They also reported that time spent on these tasks decreased their time available for teaching others and reduced the quality of their education. Respondents reported spending more time on clinical documentation than on direct patient care (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Trainees' current clinical documentation workload may be a barrier to optimal patient care and to resident and fellow education. Residents and fellows report that clinical documentation duties are onerous, and there is a perceived negative effect on time spent with patients, overall quality of patient care, physician well-being, time available for teaching, and quality of resident education.

A thematic review of resident commentary on duty hours and supervision regulations.

BACKGROUND: The implementation on July 1, 2011, of new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) standards for resident supervision and duty hours has prompted considerable debate about the potential positive and negative effects of these changes on patient care and resident education. A recent large-sample study analyzed resident responses to these changes, using a Likert scale response. In this same study, 874 residents also provided free-text comments, which provide added insight into resident perspectives on duty hours and supervision. METHODS: A mixed-methods quantitative and qualitative survey of residents was conducted in August 2010 to assess resident perceptions of the proposed ACGME regulations. Common concerns in the residents' free responses were synthesized and quantified using content analysis, a common method for qualitative research. RESULTS: A total of 11 617 residents received the survey. Completed surveys were received from 2561 residents (22.0%), with 874 residents (34.1%) providing free-text responses. Most residents (83.0%) expressed unfavorable opinions about the new standards. The most frequently cited concerns included coverage issues, and a negative impact on patient care and education, as well as lack of preparation for senior roles. A smaller portion of residents commented they thought the standards would contribute to improvements in quality of life (36.1%) and patient care (4.9%). CONCLUSIONS: ACGME standards are important for graduate medical education, and their aim is to promote high-quality education and better care to patients in teaching institutions. Yet, many residents are concerned about the day-to-day impact of the 2011 regulations, in particular the 16-hour duty period for interns. Most residents who provided free-text responses had a negative impression of the new ACGME regulations. Residents' resistance to duty hour changes may represent a realization that residents are losing a central role in patient care. The concerns identified in this study demonstrate important issues for administrators and policymakers. Resident ideas and opinions should be considered in future revisions of ACGME requirements.

Klebsiella pneumoniae-associated vertebral osteomyelitis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

We report a case of a patient who underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy and subsequently developed Klebsiella pneumoniae-associated vertebral osteomyelitis after 2 months. Development of vertebral osteomyelitis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy has never been reported previously. Diagnosis was made via magnetic resonance imaging. The patient was successfully treated with intravenous antibiotics and had a complete recovery with no neurologic sequelae.