Radiation Dose and Fluoroscopy Time of Extracranial Carotid Artery Stenting : Elective vs. Emergency Treatment Including Combined Mechanical Thrombectomy in Tandem Occlusion.

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopically guided endovascular carotid artery stenting (CAS) of extracranial carotid stenosis (ECS) is a reasonable alternative to carotid endarterectomy in selected patients. Diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for this common neurointervention have not yet been defined and respective literature data are sparse. We provide detailed dosimetrics for useful expansion of the DRL catalogue. METHODS: A retrospective single-center study of patients undergoing CAS between 2013 and 2021. We analyzed dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time considering the following parameters: indications for CAS, semielective/elective versus emergency including additional mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in extracranial/intracranial tandem occlusion, etiology of ECS (atherosclerotic vs. radiation-induced), periprocedural features, e.g., number of applied stents, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and MT maneuvers, and dose protocol. Local DRL was defined as 75% percentile of the DAP distribution. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included (semielective/elective CAS n = 75, emergency CAS n = 8, CAS + MT n = 19). Total median DAP was 78.2 Gy cm2 (DRL 117 Gy cm2). Lowest and highest median dosimetry values were documented for semielective/elective CAS and CAS + MT (DAP 49.1 vs. 146.8 Gy cm2, fluoroscopy time 27.1 vs. 43.8 min; p < 0.005), respectively. Dosimetrics were significantly lower in patients undergoing 0-1 PTA maneuvers compared to ≥ 2 maneuvers (p < 0.05). Etiology of ECS, number of stents and MT maneuvers had no significant impact on dosimetry values (p > 0.05). A low-dose protocol yielded a 33% reduction of DAP. CONCLUSION: This CAS study suggests novel local DRLs for both elective and emergency cases with or without intracranial MT. A dedicated low-dose protocol was suitable for substantial reduction of radiation dose.

Dorsal Root Ganglia Volume-Normative Values, Correlation with Demographic Determinants and Reliability of Three Different Methods of Volumetry.

Background: Dorsal root ganglia (DRG) volume assessment by MR-Neurography (MRN) has evolved to an important imaging marker in the diagnostic workup of various peripheral neuropathies and pain syndromes. The aim of this study was (1) to assess normal values of DRG volume and correlations with demographic determinants and (2) to quantify the inter-reader and inter-method reliability of three different methods of DRG volumetry. Methods: Sixty healthy subjects (mean age: 59.1, range 23-79) were examined using a 3D T2-weighted MRN of the lumbosacral plexus at 3 Tesla. Normal values of DRG L3 to S2 were obtained after exact volumetry based on manual 3D segmentation and correlations with demographic variables were assessed. For the assessment of inter-reader and inter-method reliability, DRG volumes in a subset of 25 participants were measured by two independent readers, each applying (1) exact volumetry based on 3D segmentation, (2) axis-corrected, and (3) non-axis-corrected volume estimation. Intraclass correlation coefficients were reported and the Bland-Altman analysis was conducted. Results: Mean DRG volumes ranged from 124.8 mm3 for L3 to 323.3 mm3 for S1 and did not differ between right and left DRG. DRG volume (mean of L3 to S1) correlated with body height (r = 0.42; p = 0.0008) and weight (r = 0.34; p = 0.0087). DRG of men were larger than of women (p = 0.0002); however, no difference remained after correction for body height. Inter-reader reliability was high for all three methods but best for exact volumetry (ICC = 0.99). While axis-corrected estimation was not associated with a relevant bias, non-axis-corrected estimation systematically overestimated DRG volume by on average of 15.55 mm3 (reader 1) or 18.00 mm3 (reader 2) when compared with exact volumetry. Conclusion: The here presented normal values of lumbosacral DRG volume and the correlations with height and weight may be considered in future disease specific studies and possible clinical applications. Exact volumetry was most reliable and should be considered the gold standard. However, the reliability of axis-corrected and non-axis-corrected volume estimation was also high and might still be sufficient, depending on the degree of the required measurement accuracy.

Functional Aplasia of the Contralateral A1 Segment Influences Clinical Outcome in Patients with Occlusion of the Distal Internal Carotid Artery.

Background: The importance of an A1 aplasia remains unclear in stroke patients. In this work, we analyze the impact of an A1 aplasia contralateral to an acute occlusion of the distal internal carotid artery (ICA) on clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of consecutive stroke patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy at 12 tertiary care centers between January 2015 and February 2021 due to an occlusion of the distal ICA. Functional A1 aplasia was defined as the absence of A1 or hypoplastic A1 (>50% reduction to the contralateral site). Functional independence was measured by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS ≤ 2). Results: In total, 81 out of 1068 (8%) patients had functional A1 aplasia contralateral to distal ICA occlusion. Patients with functional contralateral A1 aplasia were more severely affected on admission (median NIHSS 18, IQR 15−23 vs. 17, IQR 13−21; aOR: 0.672, 95% CI: 0.448−1.007, p = 0.054) and post-interventional ischemic damage was larger (median ASPECTS 5, IQR 1−7, vs. 6, IQR 3−8; aOR: 1.817, 95% CI: 1.184−2.789, p = 0.006). Infarction occurred more often within the ipsilateral ACA territory (20/76, 26% vs. 110/961, 11%; aOR: 2.482, 95% CI: 1.389−4.437, p = 0.002) and both ACA territories (8/76, 11% vs. 5/961, 1%; aOR: 17.968, 95% CI: 4.979−64.847, p ≤ 0.001). Functional contralateral A1 aplasia was associated with a lower rate of functional independence at discharge (6/81, 8% vs. 194/965, 20%; aOR: 2.579, 95% CI: 1.086−6.122, p = 0.032) and after 90 days (5/55, 9% vs. 170/723, 24%; aOR: 2.664, 95% CI: 1.031−6.883, p = 0.043). Conclusions: A functional A1 aplasia contralateral to a distal ICA occlusion is associated with a poorer clinical outcome.