Factor V Leiden and prothrombin gene G20210A mutation and in vitro fertilization: prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The influence of thrombophilia on fertility and on IVF outcome is very controversial. The objectives of this study were: (i) to compare the prevalence of Factor V Leiden (FVL) and prothrombin gene G20210A mutation (PGM) in women undergoing IVF to women with spontaneous pregnancy; (ii) to compare the IVF outcomes and the risk of complications in FVL and PGM carrier to non-carrier women. METHODS: From March 2005 to December 2009, a total of 510 women requiring IVF were recruited in a prospective cohort study. A separate population of 490 nulliparous women who conceived naturally was also evaluated as fertile controls. All women were tested for the presence of FVL and PGM. RESULTS: The prevalence of thrombophilic mutations was the same among women requiring IVF (6.9%) and women with spontaneous pregnancy (6.9%). A total of 480 patients underwent 1105 IVF cycles. There were 30 women carriers (86 IVF cycles) and 450 non-carriers for thrombophilic mutations (1019 IVF cycles). No significant differences in the mean number of oocytes retrieved and the number of good quality embryos transferred were found between the mutation carrier and non-mutation carrier women; likewise the reproductive outcome and the IVF complications were not statistically different between the two groups. The cumulative live birth rate after six IVF cycles was similar in the mutation carrier and non-mutation carrier women. For the mutation carrier women, the optimistic estimate of cumulative live birth rate after six IVF cycles was 60.8% and the conservative estimate was 50.0%. Corresponding rates for the non-mutation carrier women were 56.8 and 36.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that FVL and PGM presence in asymptomatic women and in the absence of other risk factors do not influence IVF outcome, or represent risk factors for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), or favour thrombosis after IVF. Screening for FVL and PGM does not appear to be justified to identify the patients at the risk for IVF failure, and/or for OHSS, and/or for thrombotic complications.

Leukocytospermia and sperm preparation--a flow cytometric study.

BACKGROUND: Leukocytes represent the predominant source of reactive oxygen species both in seminal plasma and in sperm suspensions and have been demonstrated to negatively influence sperm function and fertilization rate in assisted reproduction procedures. Peroxidase test is the standard method recommended by WHO to detect semen leukocytes but it may be inaccurate. The aims of this study were (i) to compare the efficiency of swim-up and density-gradient centrifugation techniques in removing seminal leukocytes, (ii) to examine the effect of leukocytes on sperm preparation, and (iii) to compare flow cytometry and peroxidase test in determining leukocyte concentration in semen using a multiparameter flow cytometric method. METHODS: Semen samples from 126 male partners of couples undergoing infertility investigations were analyzed for leukocytospermia using standard optical microscopy and flow cytometry. Sixty-nine out of 126 samples were also processed using simultaneously the swim-up and density-gradient centrifugation techniques. A multiparameter flow cytometric analysis to assess simultaneously sperm concentration, sperm viability, sperm apoptosis, and leukocyte concentration was carried out on neat and prepared sperm. RESULTS: Both sperm preparation methods removed most seminal leukocytes. However, the concentration of leukocytes was significantly lower after swim-up compared to that after density-gradient centrifugation preparation. Leukocytes concentration, either initial or in prepared fractions, was not correlated with sperm parameters (optical microscopy and flow cytometry parameters) after semen processing. There was no correlation between leukocyte concentration in the ejaculate and sperm recovery rate, whereas a significant correlation was found between the concentration of the residual leukocytes in prepared fractions and viable sperm recovery rate. Although the overall concordance between the flow cytometry and the optical microscopy was satisfactory, the sensitivity of peroxidase test for the detection of leukocytospermia resulted low. CONCLUSION: Seminal leukocytes do not seem to influence sperm preparation results. However, for assisted conception, semen samples containing leukocytes should be processed using swim-up method. Although peroxidase-test is recommended by WHO as the standard method for determining semen leukocytes, it should not be used in clinical research study.