ABSTRACT
AIM: Investigation of the compatibility of work and family life for physicians in the Munich metropolitan area. METHODS: Survey of a representative sample of 1,800 physicians using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Men were less satisfied (7% very satisfied vs. 21%) with compatibility between work and family life than women. The group least satisfied overall was hospital-based physicians (p=0.000, chi-square=122.75). Women rather than men cut back their career due to children, perceived their professional advancement as impaired, desisted from establishing private practice or quit hospital employment altogether. Respondents strove for flexible childcare and makeshift solution if the established service failed. Most did not have that at their disposal. Hospital-based physicians wished for predictable working hours, and would like to have a say in the structure of their schedule. For the majority this was not the case. While for 80% it would be important to participate in the definition of their working hours, this was only possible in 17%. 86% found the opportunity to work part-time important, but many doctors (more than 30%) did not have that option. The biggest help for office-based physicians would be an expedited procedure by the Bavarian Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KVB) when applying for a proxy. The second most important would be the ability to hand over on-call duties. 36% of respondents felt that compatibility of work and family life was best achieved outside of patient care, during residency 42% believed this to be the case. Only 6% of physicians felt the best compatibility to be achieved in a hospital. Among the physician owners of practices, 34% considered their model to be the best way to reconcile both aspects of life. CONCLUSION: More flexible options for childcare and more influence on the definition of working hours are necessary in order to better reconcile work and family life. For office-based physicians it must be made easier to find a substitute. Currently, especially women consider children as hindering their careers. Hospitals are perceived as extremely unfavorable workplaces for achieving compatibility between work and family life.
Subject(s)
Employment , Job Satisfaction , Physicians , Child , Female , Germany , Humans , Internship and Residency , Male , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
For airway obstruction caused by subglottic hemangiomas, tracheostomy is still regarded by some as the only established therapy, despite numerous other therapeutic options. Resection with lasers was also reported, but subglottic scar formation may occur, and different laser types may have advantages over others. The charts of 46 consecutive patients over 26 years were reviewed. Until 1986, therapy involved systemic steroids or tracheostomy. Thereafter, a Neodym-Yag and after 1995 a CO2 laser was used. Mean initial stenosis was 61.0% in the first (n=15), 85.8% in the Neodym-Yag (n=14), and 86.7% in the CO2 period (n=17). Tracheostomy rates could be reduced from 76.9% to 46.9% with the Neodym-Yag and to 30.8% with the CO2 laser, and to 22.2% in children not intubated before referral. One tracheostomy obstruction resulted in severe neurological damage; granulomas required resection in 37.5%. Secondary subglottic stenosis was found in 15.4% with the Neodym-Yag, but not with the CO2 laser. With tracheostomy, 12.5% were symptom-free at age 2-3 years, vs. 25.0% in the Neodym-Yag and 41.6% in the CO2 laser period. Speech development was delayed in 75.0% with tracheostomy, and parental anxiety lessened in only 18.8% before the second birthday (68.8% without tracheostomy). Since the end of the retrospective analysis, we treated a further 21 patients (mean stenosis, 83.3%) with the CO2 laser, with only one tracheostomy (4.8%). Compared to steroids and tracheostomy, a significant reduction in morbidity and speech developmental delay, and an improved quality of life, were achieved with CO2 laser resection, and this approach was superior to the Neodym-Yag laser.
