Multidrug-resistant tuberculous meningitis in patients with AIDS.

We present clinical manifestations, bacteriologic characteristics, and outcomes for eight patients with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculous meningitis and AIDS. All developed meningitis as a terminal complication of previously diagnosed MDR-TB despite anti-tuberculosis therapy. Seven patients presented with fever, five with headache, four with altered mentation, two with focal deficits and one with seizures. CSF examination revealed pleocytosis, hypoglychorrhachia and elevated protein. Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampin was isolated from all patients. Intracerebral mass lesions were detected in three patients, hydrocephalus in three, meningeal enhancement in five, and infarcts in two. Seven patients died 1-16 weeks after the diagnosis of meningitis; the eighth was lost to follow-up. MDR tuberculous meningitis is a difficult-to-treat infection with a high fatality rate.

Predictors of virologic and clinical outcomes in HIV-1-infected patients receiving concurrent treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 320.

BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients with HIV infection will not respond to antiretroviral therapy. Early predictors of response to treatment are needed to identify patients who are at risk for treatment failure. OBJECTIVE: To determine predictors of virologic and clinical response to indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine therapy. DESIGN: Observational analysis of one treatment group in a phase III trial. SETTING: 40 AIDS Clinical Trials units. PATIENTS: 489 patients receiving indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine who had 1) a CD4 count of 0.200 x 10(9) cells/L or less after 8 or more weeks of study therapy and 2) plasma HIV-1 RNA measurements obtained at baseline and week 8. MEASUREMENTS: HIV-1 RNA level and CD4 cell count at weeks 0, 4, 8, 24, and 40. Clinical progression was defined as a new AIDS-defining illness or death. RESULTS: Patients' levels of HIV-1 RNA at the 8th study week of therapy predicted whether patients would achieve virologic suppression to below 500 (or 50) copies/mL at study week 24. An HIV-1 RNA level less than 500 copies/mL at week 24 was achieved in 71% of patients whose level at week 8 had been less than 500 copies/mL, 53% of those with a level of 500 copies/mL or more and at least 2-log(10) copies/mL reduction since baseline, 29% of those with a level of 500 copies/mL or more with a 1- to 1.99-log(10) copies/mL reduction, and 9% of those with a level of 500 copies/mL or greater and less than 1-log(10) copies/mL reduction since baseline (P < 0.001). HIV-1 RNA level at week 8 also predicted clinical progression. HIV-1 disease progressed in 2.2% of the patients with a week-8 HIV-1 RNA level less than 500 copies/mL, 2.3% of patients with 500 copies/mL or greater and at least 2-log(10) copies/mL reduction since baseline, 4.9% of patients with 500 copies/mL or greater and 1- to 1.99-log(10) copies/mL reduction since baseline, and 10.6% of patients with 500 copies/mL or greater and less than 1-log(10) copies/mL decrease since baseline (P = 0.009). After adjustment for HIV-1 RNA level, patients with a higher week-8 CD4 cell count were more likely to have a week-24 HIV-1 RNA level less than 500 copies/mL (relative risk for patients with a week-8 CD4 count >/= 0.10 x 10(9) cells/L, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.00 to 2.16] compared with <0.050 x 10(9) cells/L; relative risk for patients with a week-8 CD4 count of 0.05 to 0.099 x 10(9) cells/L, 0.98 [CI, 0.61 to 1.57] compared with <0.050 x 10(9) cells/L). After adjustment for HIV-1 RNA level, patients with a week-8 CD4 count of 0.05 x 10(9) cells/L or greater (compared with <0.05 x 10(9) cells/L) had a decreased hazard for clinical progression (hazard ratio, 0.25 [CI, 0.09 to 0.67]). CONCLUSIONS: The HIV-1 RNA level and CD4 cell count achieved at 8 weeks of treatment are important predictors of subsequent virologic and clinical outcomes.

Do HIV type 1 RNA levels provide additional prognostic value to CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts in patients with advanced HIV type 1 infection?

Our objective was to assess whether HIV-1 RNA levels provide additional prognostic information beyond CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts in the prediction of subsequent HIV-1 disease progression among patients with advanced HIV-1 disease. In a nested case-control study conducted in patients with baseline CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts < 300 cells/mm(3) and receiving nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 102 patients who progressed to an AIDS-defining event or death were matched within 10 CD4(+) T lymphocyte cells/mm(3) to patients who did not progress. The relationship between plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and HIV-1 disease progression was studied using conditional logistic regression analysis, which adjusts for the matching by baseline CD4(+) T lymphocytes. We observed a 0.10 log(10) copies/ml difference in baseline HIV-1 RNA levels between cases and their matched controls (p = 0.027). The relative risk for HIV-1 disease progression increased with increasing baseline HIV-1 RNA levels (odds ratio [OR] for a 3-fold higher HIV-1 RNA level, 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08--1.86), and remained important when also controlling for clinical status at baseline and CD4(+) T lymphocytes at 2 months (p = 0.038). Higher baseline HIV-1 RNA levels were associated with HIV-1 disease progression among patients with a baseline CD4(+) T lymphocyte count of 100 cells/mm(3) or greater (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.15--2.81), but not among patients with a baseline CD4(+) T lymphocyte count < 100 cells/mm(3) (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.73--1.63). We concluded that HIV-1 RNA levels predict subsequent HIV-1 disease progression independent of CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts. The magnitude and importance of the prognostic information contained in the HIV-1 RNA levels appear to depend on the CD4(+) T lymphocyte counts.

Concentration-targeted phase I trials of atevirdine mesylate in patients with HIV infection: dosage requirements and pharmacokinetic studies. The ACTG 187 and 199 study teams.

RATIONALE: To determine the dosage requirements and pharmacokinetics of atevirdine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and its N-dealkylated metabolite (N-ATV) during phase I studies in patients receiving atevirdine alone or in combination with zidovudine. DESIGN: Two open label, phase I studies conducted by the adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) in which atevirdine was administered every 8 h with weekly dosage adjustments to attain targeted trough plasma atevirdine concentrations. SETTING: Five Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Units. PATIENTS: Fifty patients (ACTG 199; n = 20 and ACTG 187; n = 30) with HIV-1 infection and < or =500 CD4+ lymphocytes/mm3. INTERVENTION: ACTG 199; 12 weeks of therapy with atevirdine (dose-adjusted to achieve plasma trough atevirdine concentrations of 5-10 microM) and zidovudine (200 mg every 8 h). ACTG 187: 12 weeks of atevirdine monotherapy with atevirdine doses adjusted to achieve escalating, targeted trough plasma concentration ranges (5-13, 14-22, and 23-31 microM). MEASUREMENTS: ACTG 199: atevirdine, N-ATV and zidovudine trough determinations weekly (all patients) and intensive pharmacokinetics (selected patients) prior to and at 6 and 12 weeks during combination therapy. ACTG 187: atevirdine and N-ATV trough concentrations over a 12 week period. Intensive pharmacokinetic studies were conducted prior to and at 4 and/or 8 weeks during atevirdine monotherapy in female patients. RESULTS: Atevirdine plasma concentrations demonstrated considerable interpatient variability which was minimized by the adjustment of maintenance doses (range: 600-3900 mg/day) to achieve the desired trough concentrations. In ACTG 187, the mean number of weeks to attain the target value, and the percentage of patients who attained the target, was group I (5-11 microM): 2.7+/-2.4 weeks (92%); group II (12-21 microM): 2.6+/-1.8 (64%); and group III (22-31 microM): 7.0+/-5.6 weeks (27%). In ACTG 199 it was 3.2+/-5.2 weeks (95%) to achieve a 5-10 microM trough. Atevirdine demonstrated a mono- or bi-exponential decline among most of the patients studied after the first dose. During multiple-dosing a number of patterns of atevirdine disposition were observed including; rapid absorption with Cmax at 0.5-1 h, delayed absorption with Cmax at 3-4 h; minimal Cmax to Cmin fluctuation and Cmax to Cmin ratios of > 4. N-ATV (an inactive metabolite) patterns were characterized on day one by rapid appearance of the metabolite which peaked at 2-3 h after the dose and declined in a mono- or bi-exponential manner. At steady-state N-ATV patterns demonstrated minimal Cmax to Cmin fluctuations with some of the patients having more stable plasma N-ATV concentrations, while others had greater fluctuations week to week. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable interpatient variability was noted in the pharmacokinetics of atevirdine. The variation in drug disposition was reflected in the range of daily doses required to attain the targeted trough concentrations. Atevirdine metabolism did not appear to reach saturation during chronic dosing in many of our patients, as reflected by the pattern of N-ATV/ATV ratios in plasma and saturation was not an explanation for the variation in dosing requirements. No apparent differences were noted between males and females, and atevirdine did not appear to influence zidovudine disposition.

Delavirdine susceptibilities and associated reverse transcriptase mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates from patients in a phase I/II trial of delavirdine monotherapy (ACTG 260).

The development of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to delavirdine (DLV) was studied in subjects receiving DLV monotherapy. Phenotypic resistance developed in 28 of 30 subjects within 8 weeks. K103N and Y181C, which confer nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) cross-resistance, were the predominant reverse transcriptase mutations. P236L, which confers DLV resistance but hypersensitivity to other NNRTIs, developed in <10% of isolates.

Antiretroviral therapy in adults: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel.

OBJECTIVE: To update recommendations for antiretroviral therapy for adult human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection, based on new information and drugs that are available. PARTICIPANTS: A 17-member international physician panel with antiretroviral research and HIV patient care experience initially convened by the International AIDS Society-USA in December 1995. EVIDENCE: Available clinical and basic science data including phase 3 controlled trials; data on clinical, virologic, and immunologic end points; research conference reports; HIV pathogenesis data; and panel expert opinion. Recommendations were limited to therapies available (US Food and Drug Administration approved) in 1999. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The panel assesses new research reports and interim results and regularly meets to consider how the new data affect therapy recommendations. Recommendations are updated via full-panel consensus. Guidelines are presented as recommendations if the supporting evidence warrants routine use in the particular situation and as considerations if data are preliminary or incomplete but suggestive. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of new antiretroviral drugs has expanded treatment choices. The importance of adherence, emerging long-term complications of therapy, recognition and management of antiretroviral failure, and new monitoring tools are addressed. Optimal care requires individualized management and ongoing attention to relevant scientific and clinical information in the field.

Antiretroviral therapy in 1999 for antiretroviral-naive individuals with HIV infection.

The choice of initial antiretroviral regimen for treating people infected with HIV is crucial to successful long-term control of virus replication. Potent antiretroviral therapy substantially suppresses viral replication as measured by plasma HIV RNA levels to below limits of detection: the current standard of care is usually a combination of at least three drugs and frequently includes a protease inhibitor, or alternatively a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (nnRTI). Patients who have low CD4+ cell counts (< or = 200 CD4+ cells/mm3) or high plasma HIV RNA levels (> or = 100,000 copies/ml) may not attain maximal suppression of HIV replication when treated with current regimens and may require more aggressive therapy. In contrast, patients with relatively normal CD4+ cell counts and low to non-measurable levels of plasma HIV RNA over prolonged periods (i.e., slow or non-progressors) may not require immediate antiretroviral therapy. These individuals should reconsider treatment when either the CD4+ cell count declines or the HIV RNA level increases. Early and potent antiretroviral therapy should provide more durable virological and clinical benefits for many patients, especially if they receive sufficient counselling and support to aid adherence to the treatment regimen. The optimum time to initiate antiretroviral therapy is not well established, but to maximise the recovery of the immune system and the virological and clinical benefits, initiation of therapy is generally recommended for individuals who have symptoms or those with plasma HIV RNA levels > 5000-10,000 copies/ml, or CD4+ cell counts < 500 cells/mm3. The current choice of initial antiretroviral regimens includes two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nRTI) with a potent, well-tolerated HIV-1 protease inhibitor or nnRTI. Recent short-term activity data (24-week comparative clinical trial data) indicate that regimens combining three nRTI, including abacavir, could also be considered. Other emerging combination regimens for consideration include two HIV-1 protease inhibitors with one or two nRTI, or a combination of drugs from all current categories (e.g., nRTI with a nnRTI and HIV-1 protease inhibitor). The goal of antiretroviral therapy is to maximise suppression of HIV replication and thereby prevent or delay viral resistance, restore immunological function and improve clinical outcome. Since evolution of the virus towards resistance can occur with plasma HIV RNA levels between 50 and 500 copies/ml, current standards for best suppression of HIV replication have shifted to declines in plasma HIV RNA to < 50 copies/ml. In addition, non-adherence to any regimen is associated with the greatest risk for virological failure. Therefore, both the decision to initiate therapy and the choice of initial therapy should be carefully weighted and balanced with the long-term implications of antiretroviral therapy.

Lamivudine in combination with zidovudine, stavudine, or didanosine in patients with HIV-1 infection. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 306 Investigators.

OBJECTIVE: To study the antiviral activity of lamivudine (3TC) plus zidovudine (ZDV), didanosine (ddl), or stavudine (d4T). DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, partially double-blinded multicenter study. SETTING: Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Units. PATIENTS: Treatment-naive HIV-infected adults with 200-600x10(6) CD4 T lymphocytes/l. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were openly randomized to a d4T or a ddl limb, then randomized in a blinded manner to receive: d4T (80 mg/day), d4T plus 3TC (300 mg/day), or ZDV (600 mg/day) plus 3TC, with matching placebos; or ddl (400 mg/day), ddl plus 3TC (300 mg/day), or ZDV (600 mg/day) plus 3TC, with matching placebos. After 24 weeks 3TC was added for patients assigned to the monotherapy arms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA level at weeks 24 and 48. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-nine patients were enrolled. After 24 weeks the mean reduction in plasma HIV-1 RNA copies/ml from baseline was 0.49 log10 (d4T monotherapy) versus 1.03 log10 (d4T plus 3TC; P = 0.001), and 0.68 log10 (ddl monotherapy) versus 0.82 log10 (ddl plus 3TC; P>0.22). After 48 weeks the mean reduction was 1.08 log10 (d4T plus 3TC) versus 1.01 log10 (ZDV plus 3TC) in the d4T limb (P = 0.66), and 0.94 log10 (ddl plus 3TC) versus 0.88 log10 (ZDV plus 3TC; P = 0.70) in the ddl limb. CONCLUSIONS: 3TC added significantly to the virologic effects of d4T, but not ddl, in treatment-naive patients. 3TC plus d4T produced virologic changes comparable to those of 3TC plus ZDV. These results support the use of 3TC with either ZDV or d4 as a component of initial combination antiretroviral therapy.

Population pharmacokinetics of nevirapine, zidovudine, and didanosine in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 241 Investigators.

The population pharmacokinetics of nevirapine (NVP), zidovudine (ZDV), and didanosine (ddI) were evaluated in a total of 175 patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus randomized to receive either a double combination of ZDV plus ddI or a triple combination of NVP plus ZDV plus ddI as a substudy of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 241. Levels (approximating 3.5 determinations/patient) of the three drugs in plasma were measured during 44 of a total 48 weeks of study treatment, and a set of potential covariates was available for nonlinear mixed-effect modeling analysis. A one-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination was fitted to the NVP data. Individual oral clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) averaged 0.0533 liters/h/kg of body weight and 1.17 liters/kg, respectively. Gender was the only covariate which significantly correlated with the CL of NVP. ZDV and ddI data were described by a two-compartment model with zero-order input and first-order elimination. Individual mean oral CL, VSS (volume of distribution at steady state), and V of ZDV were 1.84 liters/h/kg and 6.68 and 2.67 liters/kg, respectively, with body weight and age as correlates of CL and body weight as a correlate of VSS. The average individual oral CL, VSS, and V of ddI were 1.64 liters/h/kg and 3.56 and 2.74 liters/kg, respectively, with body weight as a significant correlate of both CL and VSS. The relative bioavailability (F) of ZDV and ddI in the triple combination compared to that in the double combination was also evaluated. No significant effects of the combination regimens on the F of ddI were detected (FTRIPLE = 1.05 and FDOUBLE = 1 by definition), but the F of ZDV was markedly reduced by the triple combination, being only 67.7% of that of the double combination. Large (>50%) intraindividual variability was associated with both ZDV and ddI pharmacokinetics. Individual cumulative area under the plasma drug level-time curve of the three drugs was calculated for the entire study period as a measure of drug exposure based on the individual data and the final-model estimates of structural and statistical parameters.

A randomized, controlled, double-blind study comparing the survival benefit of four different reverse transcriptase inhibitor therapies (three-drug, two-drug, and alternating drug) for the treatment of advanced AIDS. AIDS Clinical Trial Group 193A Study Team.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to compare the effects of dual or triple combinations of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitors with respect to survival. The time to new HIV disease progression or death, toxicities, the change in CD4 cells, and plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations in a subset of study subjects were evaluated. DESIGN: This was a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING: The study was conducted among 42 adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group sites and 7 National Hemophilia Foundation centers. PATIENTS: 1313 HIV-infected patients with CD4 counts < or = 50 cells/mm3 participated in this study, which was conducted from June 1993 to June 1996. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to one of four daily regimens containing 600 mg of zidovudine: zidovudine alternating monthly with 400 mg didanosine; zidovudine plus 2.25 mg of zalcitabine; zidovudine plus 400 mg of didanosine; or zidovudine plus 400 mg of didanosine plus 400 mg of nevirapine (triple therapy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome was survival (i.e., time to death). RESULTS: A significant difference in survival time was found between the four treatment groups, favoring those assigned to triple therapy (p = .02). A significant difference was also found in the delay of disease progression or death among the four treatment arms favoring the group assigned to triple therapy (p = .002). Baseline CD4 cell counts and plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations as well as changes of CD4 counts at week 8 predicted survival for subjects in the virology substudy. CONCLUSIONS: In the pre-protease inhibitor era, a combination of triple reverse transcriptase inhibitors prolonged life and delayed disease progression in AIDS patients with advanced immune suppression.

Phase I study of atevirdine mesylate (U-87201E) monotherapy in HIV-1-infected patients.

The safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of atevirdine (ATV), a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, were studied in a phase I/II clinical trial (ACTG 187) of patients with CD4 counts < or =500/mm3. In all, 34 HIV-1-infected patients were randomized to receive ATV for 12 weeks in doses chosen to achieve one of three serum trough levels: 5 to 13 microM, 14 to 22 microM, or 23 to 31 microM. Rash was the most common adverse event, with a grade 3 or 4 rash occurring in 4 patients. No significant change from baseline in HIV-1 plasma RNA mean copy number was detected at week 4 (+0.09 log10 copies/ml; p = .30). However, some evidence indicated moderate antiviral activity at week 4, based on median changes in CD4 count (+23/mm3; p = .05), and viral peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) titer (-0.68 log10) copies/ml; p = .03). In addition, 2 of 4 patients with detectable baseline serum p24 antigen showed declines of >50%. HIV-1 resistance to ATV was detected in 41% of patients and was most commonly associated with RT mutations K103N and Y181C. In contrast, the Y181C mutation was not detected in ATV-resistant isolates obtained from patients enrolled in ACTG 199, a study of ATV given in combination with zidovudine. Under the conditions of this study, ATV failed to demonstrate significant antiretroviral activity. However, transient in vivo activity might have been obscured by rapid development of resistance coupled with inadequate sampling at early time points following initiation of ATV therapy.

CD4 cell count as a surrogate endpoint in HIV clinical trials: a meta-analysis of studies of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate initial changes in CD4 cell count as a surrogate endpoint for clinical outcome in HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of all relevant Phase II and III randomized clinical trials undertaken by the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group. METHODS: Individual patient data were obtained from each clinical trial, and the difference between a pair of treatments in their effect on clinical outcome (AIDS or death, or death alone) during 2 years of follow-up was evaluated. The proportion of treatment effect explained (PTE) was the proportion of this difference explained by the change in CD4 cell count 6 months after starting treatment, evaluated using proportional hazards models. A weighted average PTE across treatment comparisons was obtained. The association between the difference between treatments in clinical outcome, expressed as hazard ratio, and the difference in mean change in CD4 cell count was evaluated using regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 15 clinical trials involving 24 treatment comparisons. The weighted average PTE for both progression to AIDS or death was 0.16 [95% confidence interval (Cl), 0.07-0.26] and for death was 0.10 (95% Cl, 0.00-0.20). There were significant associations between treatment differences in effect on AIDS or death, and on death alone, and the difference in mean change in CD4 cell count. A difference in mean change in CD4 cell count of 30 or 40 x 10(6)/l or more in favor of the test treatment indicated with high probability that there was a corresponding difference in progression to AIDS or death. CONCLUSIONS: The small PTE suggest that other mechanisms of drug action not captured by initial change in CD4 cells are important. CD4 cell count is a weak surrogate endpoint, but has some value as an aid for screening treatments for drug development or preliminary regulatory approval.

Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin versus doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vincristine in the treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma: results of a randomized phase III clinical trial.

PURPOSE: Kaposi's sarcoma (KS), the most common neoplasm in patients with AIDS, is a significant clinical problem for which current therapies are frequently unsatisfactory. We conducted a randomized phase III clinical trial to compare the efficacy and toxicities of a new form of therapy, pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin, with standard combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced AIDS-related KS (AIDS-KS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred fifty-eight patients with advanced AIDS-KS were randomly assigned to receive either pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin (20 mg/m2) or the combination of doxorubicin (20 mg/m2), bleomycin (10 mg/m2) and vincristine (1 mg) (ABV) every 14 days for six cycles. Standard response criteria, toxicity criteria, and predefined indicators of clinical benefit were examined to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: Among 133 patients randomized to receive pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin, one achieved a complete clinical response and 60 achieved a partial response for an overall response rate of 45.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37% to 54%). Among 125 patients randomized to receive ABV, 31 achieved a partial response (24.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17% to 32%). This difference was statistically significant (P < .001). In addition to objective responses, prospectively defined clinical benefits and toxicity outcomes also favored pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin. CONCLUSION: Pegylated-liposomal doxorubicin is more effective and less toxic than the standard combination chemotherapy regimen ABV for treatment of AIDS-KS.

Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1998: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel.

OBJECTIVE: To provide recommendations for antiretroviral therapy based on information available in mid-1998. PARTICIPANTS: An international panel of physicians with expertise in antiretroviral research and care of patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, first convened by the International AIDS Society-USA in December 1995. EVIDENCE: The panel reviewed available clinical and basic science study results (including phase 3 controlled trials; clinical, virologic, and immunologic end point data; data presented at research conferences; and studies of HIV pathophysiology); opinions of panel members were also considered. Recommendations were limited to drugs available in mid-1998. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Panel members monitor new clinical research reports and interim results. The full panel meets regularly to discuss how the new information may change treatment recommendations. Updated recommendations are developed through consensus of the entire panel at each stage of development. CONCLUSIONS: Accumulating data from clinical and pathogenesis studies continue to support early institution of potent antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. A variety of combination regimens show potency, expanding choices for initial regimens for individual patients. Plasma HIV RNA assays with increased sensitivity are important in monitoring therapeutic response; however, more data are needed to determine precisely the HIV RNA levels that define treatment failure. Long-term adverse drug effects are beginning to emerge, requiring ongoing attention. Some issues regarding optimal long-term approaches to antiretroviral management are unresolved. The increased complexity in HIV management requires ongoing monitoring of new data for optimal treatment of HIV infection.

Disseminated miliary tuberculosis of the skin in patients with AIDS: report of four cases.

We present clinical, bacteriologic, and pathological findings for four patients with AIDS and cutaneous miliary tuberculosis. All patients had generalized tuberculosis with hematogenous dissemination to multiple organs including the skin. Microscopic examination of the skin lesions revealed ill-formed or no granulomata, extensive necrosis, and numerous acid-fast bacilli. Mycobacterium tuberculosis was detected in the skin lesions by cultures for three patients and by polymerase chain reaction for one. Three of the isolates were resistant to at least isoniazid and rifampin, and one was susceptible to these drugs. The outcome was rapidly fatal for the three patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. This report draws attention to the reappearance of a once-rare manifestation of disseminated tuberculosis which, in the setting of advanced human immunodeficiency virus disease, may offer the first indication of infection with multidrug-resistant M. tuberculosis and a poor prognosis.

Use of changes in plasma levels of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA to assess the clinical benefit of antiretroviral therapy.

Data from 1330 human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients enrolled in seven antiretroviral treatment trials were analyzed to characterize the clinical benefit of treatment-mediated reductions in plasma HIV-1 RNA levels. The risk of a new AIDS-defining event or death was reduced proportionally to the magnitude of the reduction of the HIV-1 RNA level during the first 6 months of therapy. Pretherapy HIV-1 RNA levels were prognostic independently of on-therapy levels. In addition, the reduction in risk associated with any given reduction of the level of HIV-1 RNA did not vary by pretherapy level. Having either a reduction in HIV-1 RNA level or an increase in CD4+ lymphocyte count, or both, was associated with a delay in clinical disease progression. This indicates that patient prognosis should be assessed using both HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ lymphocyte responses to therapy.

Safety and antiviral activity of combination therapy with zidovudine, zalcitabine, and two doses of interferon-alpha2a in patients with HIV. AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study 197.

We conducted a three-arm, randomized, phase II study to evaluate the combination of zidovudine (600 mg/day) and zalcitabine (2.25 mg/day) alone or with one of two interferon-alpha2a doses (1 mIU or 6 mIU daily). Primary study endpoints included toxicity and changes from baseline for plasma HIV-1 RNA, CD4 cells, and quantitative microculture at weeks 8 and 24. Sixty-three patients with HIV infection and <400 CD4 cells/mm3 were enrolled; four patients discontinued therapy within 2 weeks. Adverse event rates were 37%, 32%, and 60%, respectively, for the nucleoside, 1-mIU interferon, and 6-mIU interferon combination groups. Increasing doses of interferon resulted in significantly greater hematologic toxicity (p = 0.03) and peripheral neuropathy (p = 0.02). Plasma HIV-1 RNA reductions were noted across all treatment groups at week 8 (p < 0.001) but only for the nucleoside and 1-mIU interferon combination groups at week 24 (p < 0.001). Mean reductions in HIV-1 RNA at week 8 were 0.94, 1.29, and 1.40 log10, respectively, for the nucleoside, 1-mIU interferon, and 6-mIU interferon combination groups (p = 0.05); no differences were noted at week 24. No differences in CD4 cell counts were seen. The addition of interferon-alpha2a to zidovudine and zalcitabine resulted in transient enhanced decreases in viral load and increased toxicity.

A controlled trial of two nucleoside analogues plus indinavir in persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection and CD4 cell counts of 200 per cubic millimeter or less. AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 Study Team.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of adding a protease inhibitor to two nucleoside analogues to treat human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection are not clear. We compared treatment with the protease inhibitor indinavir in addition to zidovudine and lamivudine with treatment with the two nucleosides alone in HIV-infected adults previously treated with zidovudine. METHODS: A total of 1156 patients not previously treated with lamivudine or protease inhibitors were stratified according to CD4 cell count (50 or fewer vs. 51 to 200 cells per cubic millimeter) and randomly assigned to one of two daily regimens: 600 mg of zidovudine (or stavudine) and 300 mg of lamivudine, or that regimen with 2400 mg of indinavir. The primary end point was the time to the development of the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) or death. RESULTS: The proportion of patients whose disease progressed to AIDS or death was lower with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine (6 percent) than with zidovudine and lamivudine alone (11 percent; estimated hazard ratio, 0.50; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.33 to 0.76; P=0.001). Mortality in the two groups was 1.4 percent and 3.1 percent, respectively (estimated hazard ratio, 0.43; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.19 to 0.99; P=0.04). The effects of treatment were similar in both CD4 cell strata. The responses of CD4 cells and plasma HIV-1 RNA paralleled the clinical results. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with indinavir, zidovudine, and lamivudine as compared with zidovudine and lamivudine alone significantly slows the progression of HIV-1 disease in patients with 200 CD4 cells or fewer per cubic millimeter and prior exposure to zidovudine.

Report of 24 cases of Listeria monocytogenes infection at the University of Miami Medical Center.

To examine the epidemiological spectrum of human listeriosis at a large municipal hospital in Miami, we reviewed the cases of Listeria monocytogenes infection seen at the University of Miami Medical Center over a nine-year period (1986-94). Twenty-four patients (13 adults, 11 neonates) with bacteriologically proven Listeria monocytogenes infections were identified. The annual rate of listeriosis for the entire period 1986-1994 was 0.042 cases/1,000 hospital admissions. The rates of listeriosis during the first half of the study period (0.0628/1,000 admissions) were three times higher than the rates observed during the second half of the study (0.0214/1,000 admissions). Four (57%) of the 7 adult cases of listeriosis seen after 1987 occurred in HIV-seropositive patients. Compared with the hospital population, the annual rates of listeriosis were several fold higher in patients post-renal transplant (4.65 cases/1,000 renal transplant-related admissions) and patients with HIV/AIDS (0.27 cases/1,000 HIV-related admissions). No deaths were recorded. The decline in the annual rate of listeriosis noted in our study parallels national trends recently reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1997. Updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA panel.

OBJECTIVE: To provide current recommendations for antiretroviral therapy for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. PARTICIPANTS: The original International AIDS Society-USA 13-member panel representing international expertise in antiretroviral research and care of patients with HIV infection. EVIDENCE: The following were considered: Newly available clinical and basic science study results, including phase 3 controlled trials; clinical, virological, and immunologic end-point data; interim analyses of studies presented at national and international research conferences; studies of HIV pathophysiology; and expert opinions of panel members. Recommendations were limited to the drugs available in mid 1997. PROCESS: The full panel met on a regular basis (July 1996, September 1996, November 1996, January 1997, and April 1997) since the publication of its initial recommendations in mid 1996 to review new research reports and interim results. The panel discussed whether and how new information changed its initial recommendations. The recommendations contained herein were determined by group consensus. CONCLUSIONS: New data have provided a stronger rationale for earlier initiation of more aggressive therapy than previously recommended and reinforce the importance of careful selection of initial drug regimen for each patient for optimal long-term clinical benefit and adherence. The plasma viral load is a crucial element of clinical management for assessing prognosis and the effectiveness of therapy, and such testing must be done properly. Treatment failure is most readily indicated by a rising plasma HIV RNA level and should be confirmed prior to a change of treatment. Therapeutic approaches must be updated as new data, particularly on the long-term clinical effect of aggressive antiretroviral treatment, continue to emerge.