Severe pulmonary hypertension-interstitial lung disease presenting as right ventricular failure: stabilisation with intravenous prostacyclin and maintenance with inhaled prostacyclin.

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) leads to increased morbidity and mortality in interstitial lung disease (ILD). While the INCREASE trial highlighted the use of inhaled prostacyclin in PH-ILD patients, such therapy may be inadequate when right ventricular failure (RVF) is also present. In this study, we report the use of intravenous prostacyclin in three PH-ILD patients to stabilise right ventricular (RV) function, with a subsequent transition to maintenance therapy with inhaled prostacyclin. Methods: We evaluated three consecutive PH-ILD patients with RVF. RV afterload and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were treated with intravenous prostacyclin during the induction phase of the therapy. Patients transitioned from intravenous prostacyclin to the maintenance phase of the treatment with inhaled prostacyclin once three transition criteria were met: cardiac index (CI) >2 L·min-1·m-2, PVR <7 Wood units (WU) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) change >1 mm or TAPSE >1.6 cm. Results: Pre-treatment parameters for the three patients were a mean PVR of 14.3 WU, a mean Fick CI of 1.8 L·min-1·m-2 and a mean TAPSE of 1.4 cm. The average intravenous prostacyclin dose at the time of transition to maintenance therapy was 20.7 ng·kg-1·m-2 of treprostinil. At 3-months follow-up, the mean PVR was 6.3 WU, Fick CI 2.2 L·min-1·m-2 and TAPSE 1.7 cm. Conclusion: This case series of three PH-ILD patients with RVF introduces the concept of an initial intravenous prostacyclin induction phase, followed by a transition to maintenance therapy with inhaled prostacyclin. Further development of this treatment algorithm with a refinement of the transition criteria, potential testing in a clinical trial and a longer-term follow-up period is warranted to improve the outcomes of advanced PH-ILD patients with concomitant RVF.

Assessing the optimal MAP target in pre-capillary PH patients with RV failure: A retrospective analysis.

Right ventricular failure (RVF) in pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. While mean arterial pressure (MAP) goals have been well established in critical care literature, the optimal MAP target for patients with RVF secondary to pre-capillary PH remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the difference in outcomes between patients who were managed with different MAP targets. We retrospectively analyzed records of 60 patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit for decompensated RVF secondary to pre-capillary PH. The records were stratified into two groups: 30 patients who were treated with a static MAP goal of either 65 or 70 mmHg (MAP65/70) and 30 patients who received a dynamic MAP goal (MAPCVP) determined by invasively obtained central venous pressure or right atrial pressure. The dynamic MAP group had a statistically significant decrease in in-hospital mortality and incidence of acute kidney injury compared to the static MAP cohort.

Development of a brief scoring system to predict any-cause mortality in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection.

Patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection are at a high general risk for in-hospital mortality. A simple and easy-to-use model for predicting mortality based on data readily available to clinicians in the first 24 hours of hospital admission might be useful in directing scarce medical and personnel resources toward those patients at greater risk of dying. With this goal in mind, we evaluated factors predictive of in-hospital mortality in a random sample of 100 patients (derivation cohort) hospitalized for COVID-19 at our institution in April and May, 2020 and created potential models to test in a second random sample of 148 patients (validation cohort) hospitalized for the same disease over the same time period in the same institution. Two models (Model A: two variables, presence of pneumonia and ischemia); (Model B: three variables, age > 65 years, supplemental oxygen ≥ 4 L/min, and C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10 mg/L) were selected and tested in the validation cohort. Model B appeared the better of the two, with an AUC in receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of 0.74 versus 0.65 in Model A, but the AUC differences were not significant (p = 0.24. Model B also appeared to have a more robust separation of mortality between the lowest (none of the three variables present) and highest (all three variables present) scores at 0% and 71%, respectively. These brief scoring systems may prove to be useful to clinicians in assigning mortality risk in hospitalized patients.