Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Prev Med ; 56(3): 429-436, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777161

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many non-pregnant women see obstetrician-gynecologists as their sole source of medical care, yet little is known about vaccination practices of obstetrician-gynecologists for non-pregnant patients. The objectives were to assess, among a national sample of obstetrician-gynecologists, practices related to vaccine delivery in non-pregnant patients and factors associated with stocking and administering more than three different vaccines to non-pregnant patients. METHODS: E-mail and mail surveys were administered July-October 2015, with analyses performed during October-November 2015 and April-June 2018. RESULTS: The response rate was 73% (353/482). Human papillomavirus (92%); influenza (82%); and tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis vaccines (50%) were the vaccines most commonly assessed, with the remaining vaccines assessed by <40% of respondents. Vaccines most commonly administered by obstetrician-gynecologists to non-pregnant patients included human papillomavirus (81%); influenza (70%); and tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis (54%). The remaining vaccines were administered by <30% of obstetrician-gynecologists. Factors associated with routinely administering more than three vaccines to non-pregnant patients included working in a hospital-, public health-, or university-associated clinic (RR=1.87, 95% CI=1.35, 2.58, referent to private practice); a larger practice (more than five providers; RR=1.54, 95% CI=1.05, 2.27); perceiving fewer financial barriers (RR=0.74, 95% CI=0.57, 0.96); fewer practice-associated barriers (RR=0.71, 95% CI=0.55, 0.92); and greater patient barriers (RR=1.62, 95% CI=1.33, 1.98). CONCLUSIONS: Human papillomavirus; influenza; and tetanus, diphtheria, acellular pertussis vaccines are the only vaccines routinely assessed and administered to non-pregnant patients by most obstetrician-gynecologists. Given their role as the sole source of care for many women, obstetrician-gynecologists could make a positive impact on the vaccination status of their non-pregnant patients.


Subject(s)
Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Female , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Physician's Role , Practice Patterns, Physicians'
2.
Am J Prev Med ; 54(2): 205-213, 2018 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29246674

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: U.S. obstetrician/gynecologists play a critical role as vaccinators of pregnant women. However, little is known about their current immunization practices. Thus, study objectives were to determine (1) practices related to assessment of vaccination status and vaccine delivery for pregnant patients; (2) barriers to stocking and administering vaccines; and (3) factors associated with administering both influenza and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines. METHODS: An e-mail and mail survey among a national sample of obstetrician/gynecologists conducted July-October 2015 (analysis August 2016-August 2017). RESULTS: The response rate was 73.2% (353/482). Among obstetrician/gynecologists caring for pregnant women (n=324), vaccination status was most commonly assessed for influenza (97%), Tdap (92%), and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines (88%). Vaccines most commonly administered included influenza (85%) and Tdap (76%). Few respondents reported administering other vaccines to pregnant patients. More physicians reported using standing orders for influenza (66%) than Tdap (39%). Other evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccine uptake were less frequently used (electronic decision support, 42%; immunization information system to record [13%] or assess vaccination status [11%]; reminder/recall, 7%). Barriers most commonly reported were provider financial barriers, yet provider attitudinal barriers were rare. Providers who administered both influenza and Tdap vaccines were more likely to be female, perceive fewer financial and practice barriers, less likely to be in private practice, and perceive more patient barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Although most obstetrician/gynecologists administer some vaccines to pregnant women, the focus remains on influenza and Tdap. Financial barriers and infrequent use of evidence-based strategies for increasing vaccination uptake may be hindering delivery of a broader complement of adult vaccines in obstetrician/gynecologist offices.


Subject(s)
Gynecology/organization & administration , Obstetrics/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Diphtheria/prevention & control , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/administration & dosage , Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines/economics , Evidence-Based Medicine/economics , Evidence-Based Medicine/organization & administration , Evidence-Based Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gynecology/statistics & numerical data , Health Care Surveys/statistics & numerical data , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza Vaccines/economics , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Obstetrics/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Tetanus/prevention & control , United States , Vaccination/economics , Whooping Cough/prevention & control
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...