Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 278
Filter
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 41(10): 1795-1808, 2023 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36989610

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine, in women with primary operable breast cancer, if preoperative doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan; AC) therapy yields a better outcome than postoperative AC therapy, if a relationship exists between outcome and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy, and if such therapy results in the performance of more lumpectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (1,523) enrolled onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative AC therapy. Clinical tumor response to preoperative therapy was graded as complete (cCR), partial (cPR), or no response (cNR). Tumors with a cCR were further categorized as either pathologic complete response (pCR) or invasive cells (pINV). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were estimated through 5 years and compared between treatment groups. In the preoperative arm, proportional-hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between outcome and tumor response. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DFS, DDFS, or survival (P = .99, .70, and .83, respectively) among patients in either group. More patients treated preoperatively than postoperatively underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy (67.8% v 59.8%, respectively). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy were similar in both groups (7.9% and 5.8%, respectively; P = .23). Outcome was better in women whose tumors showed a pCR than in those with a pINV, cPR, or cNR (relapse-free survival [RFS] rates, 85.7%, 76.9%, 68.1%, and 63.9%, respectively; P < .0001), even when baseline prognostic variables were controlled. When prognostic models were compared for each treatment group, the preoperative model, which included breast tumor response as a variable, discriminated outcome among patients to about the same degree as the postoperative model. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, permits more lumpectomies, is appropriate for the treatment of certain patients with stages I and II disease, and can be used to study breast cancer biology. Tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases; however, knowledge of such a response provided little prognostic information beyond that which resulted from postoperative therapy.

2.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 6(15): 12307-20, 2014 Aug 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25026120

ABSTRACT

Herein, we describe the surface modification of an S-nitrosated polymer derivative via H2O plasma treatment, resulting in polymer coatings that maintained their nitric oxide (NO) releasing capabilities, but exhibited dramatic changes in surface wettability. The poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based hydrophobic polymer was nitrosated to achieve a material capable of releasing the therapeutic agent NO. The NO-loaded films were subjected to low-temperature H2O plasma treatments, where the treatment power (20-50 W) and time (1-5 min) were varied. The plasma treated polymer films were superhydrophilic (water droplet spread completely in <100 ms), yet retained 90% of their initial S-nitrosothiol content. Under thermal conditions, NO release profiles were identical to controls. Under buffer soak conditions, the NO release profile was slightly lowered for the plasma-treated materials; however, they still result in physiologically relevant NO fluxes. XPS, SEM-EDS, and ATR-IR characterization suggests the plasma treatment resulted in polymer rearrangement and implantation of hydroxyl and carbonyl functional groups. Plasma treated samples maintained both hydrophilic surface properties and NO release profiles after storage at -18 °C for at least 10 days, demonstrating the surface modification and NO release capabilities are stable over time. The ability to tune polymer surface properties while maintaining bulk properties and NO release properties, and the stability of those properties under refrigerated conditions, represents a unique approach toward creating enhanced therapeutic biopolymers.


Subject(s)
Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions , Lactic Acid/chemistry , Nitric Oxide/chemistry , Plasma Gases/chemistry , Polyglycolic Acid/chemistry , Catalysis , Cysteine/chemistry , Hydrolysis , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Nitrosation , Photoelectron Spectroscopy , Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer , S-Nitrosothiols , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission , Spectrophotometry, Infrared , Spectrophotometry, Ultraviolet , Water/chemistry , Wettability
3.
Account Res ; 21(6): 353-65, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24785995

ABSTRACT

Although it might seem to be a simple task for scientists to avoid plagiarism and thereby an allegation of research misconduct, assessment of trainees in the Responsible Conduct of Research and recent findings from the National Science Foundation Office of Inspector General regarding plagiarism suggests otherwise. Our experiences at a land-grant academic institution in assisting researchers in avoiding plagiarism are described. We provide evidence from a university-wide multi-disciplinary course that understanding how to avoid plagiarism in scientific writing is more difficult than it might appear, and that a failure to learn the rules of appropriate citation may cause dire consequences. We suggest that new strategies to provide training in avoiding plagiarism are required.


Subject(s)
Ethics, Research , Plagiarism , Research Personnel/ethics , Scientific Misconduct , Biomedical Research/ethics , Ethics, Research/education , Humans , Research Personnel/education , United States
4.
Semin Oncol ; 28(4): 400-18, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11498833

ABSTRACT

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) conducted two sequential randomized clinical trials to aid in resolving uncertainty about the treatment of women with small, localized, mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). After removal of the tumor and normal breast tissue so that specimen margins were histologically tumor-free (lumpectomy), 818 patients in the B-17 trial were randomly assigned to receive either radiation therapy to the ipsilateral breast or no radiation therapy. B-24, the second study, which involved 1,804 women, tested the hypothesis that, in DCIS patients with or without positive tumor specimen margins, lumpectomy, radiation, and tamoxifen (TAM) would be more effective than lumpectomy, radiation, and placebo in preventing invasive and noninvasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTRs), contralateral breast tumors (CBTs), and tumors at metastatic sites. The findings in this report continue to demonstrate through 12 years of follow-up that radiation after lumpectomy reduces the incidence rate of all IBTRs by 58%. They also demonstrate that the administration of TAM after lumpectomy and radiation therapy results in a significant decrease in the rate of all breast cancer events, particularly in invasive cancer. The findings from the B-17 and B-24 studies are related to those from the NSABP prevention (P-1) trial, which demonstrated a 50% reduction in the risk of invasive cancer in women with a history of atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and a reduction in the incidence of both DCIS and LCIS in women without a history of those tumors. The B-17 findings demonstrated that patients treated with lumpectomy alone were at greater risk for invasive cancer than were women in P-1 who had a history of ADH or LCIS and who received no radiation therapy or TAM. Although women who received radiation benefited from that therapy, they remained at higher risk for invasive cancer than women in P-1 who had a history of LCIS and who received placebo or TAM. Thus, if it is accepted from the P-1 findings that women at increased risk for invasive cancer are candidates for an intervention such as TAM, then it would seem that women with a history of DCIS should also be considered for such therapy in addition to radiation therapy. That statement does not imply that, as a result of the findings presented here, all DCIS patients should receive radiation and TAM. It does suggest, however, that, in the treatment of DCIS, the appropriate use of current and better therapeutic agents that become available could diminish the significance of breast cancer as a public health problem.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Radiotherapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Survival Analysis , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use
5.
Cancer ; 91(8 Suppl): 1679-87, 2001 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11309768

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This report updated previous findings, at the 15-year mark, of the National Surgical Breast and Bowel Project (NSAPB) Protocol B-06 with respect to the treatment of invasive breast carcinoma and the effects of pathologic features and the effects of some clinical features on its natural history. METHODS: Thirty-one pathologic and 6 clinical features that were observed in a pathologic subset of 1039 evaluable patients were assessed as to their value in predicting survival, in predicting ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), and in predicting the necessity for local breast irradiation after lumpectomy. The patients had been randomly assigned to treatment by lumpectomy without local irradiation or to treatment by lumpectomy with local irradiation of the breast. A traditional and another statistical method were used for this purpose. RESULTS: Multivariate analyses revealed that the presence of IBTR, race, histologic tumor type, nodal status, nuclear grade, and blood vessel invasion affected survival independently. Treatment, patient age, nuclear grade, presence of intraductal carcinoma, and a lymphocytic tumor infiltrate were features that predicted IBTR by multivariate analyses. Irradiation reduced IBTR from 36% to 12% in the analyzed cohort. A test of interaction failed to reveal any pathologic or clinical feature that might have allowed for the omission of local irradiation of the breast after lumpectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the influence of pathologic and clinical features on patient survival and IBTR, the site, histopathologic features, and time of occurrence of the latter allowed for insights into some important biologic considerations concerning invasive breast carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Life Tables , Mastectomy, Segmental , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Survival Analysis
6.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 93(2): 112-20, 2001 Jan 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11208880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty about prognosis and treatment of axillary lymph node-negative patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or ER-positive invasive breast tumors of 1 cm or less prompted the analysis of data from five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized clinical trials. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-five patients with ER-negative tumors and 1024 patients with ER-positive tumors were identified in these trials. Patients with ER-negative tumors received surgery alone or surgery and chemotherapy. Patients with ER-positive tumors received surgery alone; surgery and tamoxifen; or surgery, tamoxifen, and chemotherapy. End points were relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival, and overall survival. A result was considered to be statistically significant with a P value of.05 or less; all statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The 8-year RFS of women with ER-negative tumors who received surgery alone or with chemotherapy was 81% and 90%, respectively (P = .06). Survival was similar in both groups (93% and 91%; P = .65). The 8-year RFS of women with ER-positive tumors was 86% after surgery alone, 93% when tamoxifen was added (P = .01), and 95% after the addition of tamoxifen and chemotherapy (P = .07 compared with tamoxifen). Survival in the three groups was 90%, 92% (P = .41), and 97%, respectively. The difference between the latter two groups was significant (P = .01). Regardless of ER status or treatment, overall mortality was 8%; one half of the deaths were related to breast cancer. Several covariates affected the risk of recurrence in ER-negative and ER-positive patients. Risk was greater in women with tumors of 1 cm than in those with tumors of less than 1 cm, in women aged 49 years or younger than in those aged 50 years or older, and in women with infiltrating ductal or lobular carcinoma than in those with other histologic tumor types. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy and/or tamoxifen should be considered for the treatment of women with ER-negative or ER-positive tumors of 1 cm or less and negative axillary lymph nodes.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Canada , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Disease-Free Survival , Estrogen Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mastectomy/methods , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Prognosis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Receptors, Estrogen/analysis , Receptors, Progesterone/analysis , Risk Factors , Survival Analysis , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , United States
7.
J Clin Oncol ; 19(4): 931-42, 2001 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11181655

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Uncertainty about the relative worth of doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) and cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF), as well as doubt about the propriety of giving tamoxifen (TAM) with chemotherapy to patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors and negative axillary nodes, prompted the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project to initiate the B-23 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 2,008) were randomly assigned to CMF plus placebo, CMF plus TAM, AC plus placebo, or AC plus TAM. Six cycles of CMF were given for 6 months; four cycles of AC were administered for 63 days. TAM was given daily for 5 years. Relapse-free survival (RFS), event-free survival (EFS), and survival (S) were determined by using life-table estimates. Tests for heterogeneity of outcome used log-rank statistics and Cox proportional hazards models to detect differences across all groups and according to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy status. RESULTS: No significant difference in RFS, EFS, or S was observed among the four groups through 5 years (P =.96,.8, and.8, respectively), for those aged < or = 49 years (P =.97,.5, and.9, respectively), or for those aged > or = 50 years (P =.7,.6, and.6, respectively). A comparison between all CMF- and all AC-treated patients demonstrated no significant differences in RFS (87% at 5 years in both groups, P =.9), EFS (83% and 82%, P =.6), or S (89% and 90%, P =.4). There were no significant differences in RFS, EFS, or S between CMF and AC in patients aged < or = 49 or > or = 50 years. No significant difference in any outcome was observed when chemotherapy-treated patients who received placebo were compared with those given TAM. RFS in both groups was 87% (P =.6), 87% in patients aged < or = 49 (P =.9), and 88% and 87%, respectively (P =.4), in those aged > or = 50 years. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the outcome of patients who received AC or CMF. TAM with either regimen resulted in no significant advantage over that achieved from chemotherapy alone.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/metabolism , Receptors, Estrogen/metabolism , Tamoxifen/administration & dosage , Age Factors , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Axilla , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Cisplatin , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Fluorouracil , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Methotrexate , Middle Aged , Patient Compliance , Placebos , Survival Analysis
8.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 92(5): 388-96, 2000 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10699069

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The conviction that postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy represent an acceptable standard of care for patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the rectum evolved in the absence of data from clinical trials designed to determine whether the addition of radiotherapy results in improved disease-free survival and overall survival. This study was carried out to address this issue. An additional aim was to determine whether leucovorin (LV)-modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is superior to the combination of 5-FU, semustine, and vincristine (MOF) in men. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients (n = 694) with Dukes' B or C carcinoma of the rectum were enrolled in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Protocol R-02 from September 1987 through December 1992 and were followed. They were randomly assigned to receive either postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy alone (n = 348) or chemotherapy with postoperative radiotherapy (n = 346). All female patients (n = 287) received 5-FU plus LV chemotherapy; male patients received either MOF (n = 207) or 5-FU plus LV (n = 200). Primary analyses were carried out by use of a stratified log-rank statistic; P values are two-sided. RESULTS: The average time on study for surviving patients is 93 months as of September 30, 1998. Postoperative radiotherapy resulted in no beneficial effect on disease-free survival (P =.90) or overall survival (P =.89), regardless of which chemotherapy was utilized, although it reduced the cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse from 13% to 8% at 5-year follow-up (P =.02). Male patients who received 5-FU plus LV demonstrated a statistically significant benefit in disease-free survival at 5 years compared with those who received MOF (55% versus 47%; P =.009) but not in 5-year overall survival (65% versus 62%; P =.17). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of postoperative radiation therapy to chemotherapy in Dukes' B and C rectal cancer did not alter the subsequent incidence of distant disease, although there was a reduction in locoregional relapse when compared with chemotherapy alone.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Rectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Rectal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Leucovorin/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Semustine/administration & dosage , Sex Factors , Survival Analysis , Time Factors , Vincristine/administration & dosage
10.
J Clin Oncol ; 17(11): 3553-9, 1999 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10550154

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated fluorouracil (FU+LV) with that of fluorouracil and levamisole (FU+LEV) or with the combination of FU+LV and levamisole (FU+LV+LEV). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and December 1990, 2,151 patients with Dukes' B (stage II) and Dukes' C (stage III) carcinoma of the colon were entered onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowl Project protocol C-04. Patients were randomly assigned to receive FU+LV (weekly regimen), FU + LEV, or the combination of FU+LV+LEV. The average time on study was 86 months. RESULTS: A pairwise comparison between patients treated with FU+LV or FU+LEV disclosed a prolongation in disease-free survival (DFS) in favor of the FU+LV group (65% v 60%; P =.04); there was a small prolongation in overall survival that was of borderline significance (74% v 70%; P =.07). There was no difference in the pairwise comparison between patients who received FU+LV or FU+LV+LEV for either DFS (65% v 64%; P =.67) or overall survival (74% v 73%; P =.99). There was no interaction between Dukes' stage and the effect of treatment. CONCLUSION: In patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon, treatment with FU+LV seems to confer a small DFS advantage and a borderline prolongation in overall survival when compared with treatment with FU+LEV. The addition of LEV to FU+LV does not provide any additional benefit over and above that achieved with FU+LV. These findings support the use of adjuvant FU+LV as an acceptable therapeutic standard in patients with Dukes' B and C carcinoma of the colon.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma/drug therapy , Colonic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Aged , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Carcinoma/mortality , Carcinoma/pathology , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Fluorouracil/administration & dosage , Humans , Leucovorin/administration & dosage , Levamisole/administration & dosage , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
11.
Cancer ; 86(3): 429-38, 1999 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10430251

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This report is an 8-year update of the authors' previous findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) Protocol B-17, which relates to the influence of pathologic characteristics on the natural history and treatment of intraductal carcinoma (DCIS). METHODS: Nine pathologic features observed in a pathologic subset of 623 of 814 evaluable women enrolled in this randomized clinical trial were assessed for their role in the prediction of second ipsilateral breast tumors (IBT), other events, and selection of breast irradiation (XRT) following lumpectomy. RESULTS: The frequency of subsequent IBT was reduced from 31% to 13% (P = 0.0001) by XRT. The average annual hazard rates for IBT were reduced by XRT for all pathologic features examined. Four characteristics were individually noted to be significantly related to IBT, but only moderate-to-marked and absent-to-slight comedo necrosis were found to be independent high and low risk predictors, respectively, for such an event in patients of both treatment groups. XRT effected a 7% absolute reduction at 8 years in the low risk group. Despite a relatively high incidence (approximately 40%) of IBT consisting of invasive cancer, mortality due to breast carcinoma after DCIS for the entire cohort was found to be only 1.6% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: The degree of comedo necrosis in patients with DCIS appears to be sufficient for discriminating between high and low risks for IBT following lumpectomy for DCIS. Although margin status, unlike in our previous report, was found to have only a slight or borderline influence on the frequency of IBT at 8 years, excision of DCIS with free margins is advised. The low risk group exhibits a statistically significant reduction of IBT from XRT. The decision to forgo XRT in the treatment of this singular subset of patients would appear to depend on clinical considerations and the input of informed patients rather than being standard practice. [See editorial on pages 375-7, this issue.]


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Necrosis , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Neoplasm, Residual , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/prevention & control , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies
12.
Lancet ; 353(9169): 1993-2000, 1999 Jun 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10376613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We have shown previously that lumpectomy with radiation therapy was more effective than lumpectomy alone for the treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We did a double-blind randomised controlled trial to find out whether lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and tamoxifen was of more benefit than lumpectomy and radiation therapy alone for DCIS. METHODS: 1804 women with DCIS, including those whose resected sample margins were involved with tumour, were randomly assigned lumpectomy, radiation therapy (50 Gy), and placebo (n=902), or lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and tamoxifen (20 mg daily for 5 years, n=902). Median follow-up was 74 months (range 57-93). We compared annual event rates and cumulative probability of invasive or non-invasive ipsilateral and contralateral tumours over 5 years. FINDINGS: Women in the tamoxifen group had fewer breast-cancer events at 5 years than did those on placebo (8.2 vs 13.4%, p=0.0009). The cumulative incidence of all invasive breast-cancer events in the tamoxifen group was 4.1% at 5 years: 2.1% in the ipsilateral breast, 1.8% in the contralateral breast, and 0.2% at regional or distant sites. The risk of ipsilateral-breast cancer was lower in the tamoxifen group even when sample margins contained tumour and when DCIS was associated with comedonecrosis. INTERPRETATION: The combination of lumpectomy, radiation therapy, and tamoxifen was effective in the prevention of invasive cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/drug therapy , Tamoxifen/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma in Situ/drug therapy , Carcinoma in Situ/therapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/mortality , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/secondary , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Middle Aged , Survival Rate , Tamoxifen/adverse effects
13.
Anal Chem ; 71(15): 3187-91, 1999 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21662909

ABSTRACT

A new type of electrochemically driven actuator is described. This actuator uses graphitic carbon as the electroactive material (as opposed to the polymeric films used in previous devices of this type), and it is the first example of an actuator based on a nanostructured material. The actuator consists of branched carbon nanotubules embedded within the pores of a microporous alumina template membrane. Electrochemical Li(+) intercalation causes this nanotubule-containing membrane to flex, and electrochemical deintercalation causes the membrane to relax to its original position. The characteristics of this new actuator are described here.

14.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 171(4): 1103-10, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9763005

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the benefit of combined CT and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in diagnosing malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of 26 patients with intraabdominal and intrathoracic neoplasms who underwent CT and FDG PET between January 1995 and September 1996 were retrospectively reviewed. Most of these patients had inconclusive findings on prior CT for the diagnosis of malignancy. Only sites of potential malignant disease were included in the data analysis. Presence or absence of malignancy was confirmed by histopathology or follow-up CT. Three observers experienced in abdominal imaging used CT findings alone to estimate level of suspicion (1 = definitely not malignant to 5 = definitely malignant) for primary or recurrent neoplasms (n = 21), distant metastases (n = 25), and neoplastic nodal involvement (n = 18). Six weeks later the three observers reviewed the same CT examinations supplemented with FDG PET and reestimated suspicion of malignancy. Receiver operating characteristic methodology was used to analyze the results. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy in diagnosis of malignant disease were calculated using level 4 (probable malignancy) as the cutoff for the presence of disease. RESULTS: The mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, indicating successful diagnosis of malignancy, was .82 for CT alone and .92 for CT with FDG PET (p < .05). The accuracies for diagnosis of primary or recurrent neoplasms, distant metastases, and neoplastic nodal involvement were 62%, 68%, and 83%, respectively, for CT alone and 81% (p = .06), 88% (p = .03), and 89% (p > .25), respectively, for CT with FDG PET. Also, supplemental FDG PET imaging improved observer confidence and accuracy in diagnosing recurrent neoplasm in four (36%) of 11 patients who had undergone surgery or chemoradiation and in diagnosing four (29%) of 14 extrahepatic sites that had potential metastases. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis of malignancy in oncologic patients is significantly improved when CT is supplemented with FDG PET. Combined imaging is particularly helpful in the evaluation of potential recurrence in previously treated patients and for diagnosing extrahepatic lesions that may be distant metastases.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Fluorodeoxyglucose F18 , Radiopharmaceuticals , Thoracic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, Emission-Computed , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Abdominal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Female , Fluorine Radioisotopes , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Thoracic Neoplasms/epidemiology
15.
J Natl Cancer Inst ; 90(18): 1361-70, 1998 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9747867

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Overexpression of the erbB-2 protein by breast cancer cells has been suggested to be a predictor of response to doxorubicin. A retrospective study was designed to test this hypothesis. METHODS: In National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-11, patients with axillary lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either L-phenylalanine mustard plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) or a combination of L-phenylalanine mustard, 5-fluorouracil, and doxorubicin (PAF). Tumor cell expression of erbB-2 was determined by immunohistochemistry for 638 of 682 eligible patients. Statistical analyses were performed to test for interaction between treatment and erbB-2 status (positive versus negative) with respect to disease-free survival (DFS), survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Overexpression of erbB-2 (i.e., positive immunohistochemical staining) was observed in 239 (37.5%) of the 638 tumors studied. Overexpression was associated with tumor size (P=.02), lack of estrogen receptors (P=.008), and the number of positive lymph nodes (P=.0001). After a mean time on study of 13.5 years, the clinical benefit from doxorubicin (PAF versus PF) was statistically significant for patients with erbB-2-positive tumors--DFS: relative risk of failure (RR)=0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]=0.44-0.83), P=.001; survival: RR=0.66 (95% CI=0.47-0.92), P =.01; RFS: RR=0.58 (95% CI=0.42-0.82), P=.002; DDFS: RR=0.61 (95% CI=0.44-0.85), P=.003. However, it was not significant for patients with erbB-2-negative tumors-DFS: RR=0.96 (95% CI=0.75-1.23), P=.74; survival: RR =0.90 (95% CI=0.69-1.19), P=.47; RFS: RR=0.88 (95% CI=0.67-1.16), P=.37; DDFS: RR=1.03 (95% CI=0.79-1.35), P=.84. Interaction between doxorubicin treatment and erbB-2 overexpression was statistically significant for DFS (P=.02) and DDFS (P=.02) but not for survival (P= .15) or RFS (P=.06). CONCLUSIONS: These data support the hypothesis of a preferential benefit from doxorubicin in patients with erbB-2-positive breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Breast Neoplasms/chemistry , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Doxorubicin/therapeutic use , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/drug effects , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/chemistry , Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent/drug therapy , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Adult , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Up-Regulation/drug effects
16.
J Clin Oncol ; 16(8): 2672-85, 1998 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9704717

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine, in women with primary operable breast cancer, if preoperative doxorubicin (Adriamycin) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan; AC) therapy yields a better outcome than postoperative AC therapy, if a relationship exists between outcome and tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy, and if such therapy results in the performance of more lumpectomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (1,523) enrolled onto National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18 were randomly assigned to preoperative or postoperative AC therapy. Clinical tumor response to preoperative therapy was graded as complete (cCR), partial (cPR), or no response (cNR). Tumors with a cCR were further categorized as either pathologic complete response (pCR) or invasive cells (pINV). Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were estimated through 5 years and compared between treatment groups. In the preoperative arm, proportional-hazards models were used to investigate the relationship between outcome and tumor response. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DFS, DDFS, or survival (P = .99, .70, and .83, respectively) among patients in either group. More patients treated preoperatively than postoperatively underwent lumpectomy and radiation therapy (67.8% v 59.8%, respectively). Rates of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) after lumpectomy were similar in both groups (7.9% and 5.8%, respectively; P = .23). Outcome was better in women whose tumors showed a pCR than in those with a pINV, cPR, or cNR (relapse-free survival [RFS] rates, 85.7%, 76.9%, 68.1%, and 63.9%, respectively; P < .0001), even when baseline prognostic variables were controlled. When prognostic models were compared for each treatment group, the preoperative model, which included breast tumor response as a variable, discriminated outcome among patients to about the same degree as the postoperative model. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemotherapy is as effective as postoperative chemotherapy, permits more lumpectomies, is appropriate for the treatment of certain patients with stages I and II disease, and can be used to study breast cancer biology. Tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy correlates with outcome and could be a surrogate for evaluating the effect of chemotherapy on micrometastases; however, knowledge of such a response provided little prognostic information beyond that which resulted from postoperative therapy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Combined Modality Therapy/adverse effects , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Survival Rate
17.
J Clin Oncol ; 16(2): 441-52, 1998 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9469327

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: In 1993, findings from a National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) trial to evaluate the worth of radiation therapy after lumpectomy concluded that the combination was more beneficial than lumpectomy alone for localized intraductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS). This report extends those findings. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (N = 818) with localized DCIS were randomly assigned to lumpectomy or lumpectomy plus radiation (50 Gy). Tissue was removed so that resected specimen margins were histologically tumor-free. Mean follow-up time was 90 months (range, 67 to 130). Size and method of tumor detection were determined by central clinical, mammographic, and pathologic assessment. Life-table estimates of event-free survival and survival, average annual rates of occurrence for specific events, relative risks for event-specific end points, and cumulative probability of specific events comprising event-free survival are presented. RESULTS: The benefit of lumpectomy plus radiation was virtually unchanged between 5 and 8 years of follow-up and was due to a reduction in invasive and noninvasive ipsilateral breast tumors (IBTs). Incidence of locoregional and distant events remained similar in both treatment groups; deaths were only infrequently related to breast cancer. Incidence of noninvasive IBT was reduced from 13.4% to 8.2% (P = .007), and of invasive IBT, from 13.4% to 3.9% (P < .0001). All cohorts benefited from radiation regardless of clinical or mammographic tumor characteristics. CONCLUSION: Through 8 years of follow-up, our findings continue to indicate that lumpectomy plus radiation is more beneficial than lumpectomy alone for women with localized, mammographically detected DCIS. When evaluated according to the mammographic characteristics of their DCIS, all groups benefited from radiation.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Carcinoma in Situ/therapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy , Mastectomy, Segmental , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Carcinoma in Situ/mortality , Carcinoma in Situ/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Combined Modality Therapy , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Survival Rate
18.
J Clin Oncol ; 15(7): 2483-93, 1997 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9215816

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) permits more lumpectomies to be performed and decreases the incidence of positive nodes in women with primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (n = 1,523) were randomized to National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18; 759 eligible patients received postoperative AC and 747, preoperative AC. The clinical size of breast and axillary tumors was determined before each of four cycles of AC and before surgery. Tumor response to preoperative therapy was clinically complete (cCR), partial (cPR), stable (cSD), or progressive disease (cPD). Tissue from patients with a cCR was evaluated for a pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS: Breast tumor size was reduced in 80% of patients after preoperative therapy; 36% had a cCR. Tumor size and clinical nodal status were independent predictors of cCR. Twenty-six percent of women with a cCR had a pCR. Clinical nodal response occurred in 89% of node-positive patients: 73% had a cCR and 44% of those had a pCR. There was a 37% increase in the incidence of pathologically negative nodes. Before randomization, lumpectomy was proposed for 86% of women with tumors < or = 2 cm, 70% with tumors 2.1 to 5.0 cm, and 3% with tumors > or = 5.1 cm. Clinical tumor size and nodal status influenced the physician's decision. Overall, 12% more lumpectomies were performed in the preoperative group; in women with tumors > or = 5.1 cm, there was a 175% increase. CONCLUSION: Preoperative therapy reduced the size of most breast tumors and decreased the incidence of positive nodes. The greatest increase in lumpectomy after preoperative therapy occurred in women with tumors > or = 5 cm, since women with tumors less than 5 cm were already lumpectomy candidates. Preoperative therapy should be considered for the initial management of breast tumors judged too large for lumpectomy.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Mastectomy, Segmental , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/administration & dosage , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Cyclophosphamide/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Preoperative Care , Treatment Outcome
20.
CA Cancer J Clin ; 47(1): 52-64, 1997.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8996078

ABSTRACT

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ has become one of the most controversial topics in breast disease. While mastectomy has been the traditional treatment, many now feel it is excessive in most cases. As a result, a great effort has been made to identify pathobiological characteristics of DCIS that can be used to stratify appropriate treatment decisions. This article reviews efforts to relate pathobiological characteristics to disease management and provides treatment recommendations based on the latest evidence.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Carcinoma in Situ/radiotherapy , Carcinoma in Situ/surgery , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/surgery , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Intraductal, Noninfiltrating/surgery , Female , Humans , Mastectomy, Segmental , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Prognosis , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...