Nursing/midwifery students' perceptions of caring pedagogy and online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIM: This study aimed to gain a better understanding of nursing/midwifery students' perspectives on a pedagogy of caring and online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, it aimed to determine if the COVID-19 pandemic impacted students' perceptions and experience of online learning and students' desire to enter the nursing/midwifery workforce. DESIGN: Mixed methods. METHODS: A multi-centre cross-sectional survey of Australian nursing and midwifery students was undertaken to explore students' experience of learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: There are several key findings from this study that may be relevant for the future delivery of undergraduate health education, students transitioning to practice and healthcare workforce retention. The study found that although students were somewhat satisfied with online learning during COVID-19, students reported significant issues with knowledge/skill acquisition and barriers to the learning process. The students reported feeling less prepared for practice and identified how clinical staff were unable to provide additional guidance and support due to increased workloads and stress. The textual responses of participants highlighted that connection/disconnection, empathy and engagement/disengagement had an impact on learning during COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Connection, engagement and isolation were key factors that impacted nursing students' online learning experiences. In addition, graduates entering the workforce felt less prepared for entry into practice due to changes in education delivery during COVID-19 that they perceived impacted their level of clinical skills, confidence and ability to practice as new graduate nurses/midwives. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Not applicable. IMPACT: Attention must be given to the transition of new graduate nurses and midwives whose education was impacted by pandemic restrictions, to support their professional career development and to ensure retention of future healthcare workforce. Connection, engagement and isolation were key factors that impacted nursing students' online learning experiences. Educators should consider how connection and engagement can be actively embedded in the online learning environment.

Male nurse practice in inpatient rehabilitation. Finding a safe way: a grounded theory.

BACKGROUND: Research interest in nursing's contribution to inpatient rehabilitation is growing. Nurses contribute to rehabilitation specifically by teaching patients how to care for themselves. This contribution is largely reported from a female or genderneutral perspective. Despite the work of male nurses being examined in a range of other specialities, their work within inpatient rehabilitation remains underexplored. OBJECTIVE: To report on a grounded theory study to identify and make visible male nurse practice in inpatient rehabilitation in Australia. DESIGN: Constructivist grounded theory informed by symbolic interactionism. SETTING(S): Stage 1 data were collected in locations of participants choosing throughout Australia. Stage 2 data collection centred on seven data collection sites across two specialist rehabilitation hospitals in two states of Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three male nurses and 15 patients participated in the study. METHODS: Stage 1 (October 2013 to June 2014) consisted of semi-structured interviews with 11 male nurses. Stage 2 (February to April 2015) consisted of semi-structured interviews and 63.5 h of non-participant observation with 12 male nurses. Fifteen interviews with patients as recipients of male nurse care were also conducted. Data analysis included initial coding, focused coding, and theoretical coding using constant comparative methods, memo writing and diagramming. RESULTS: Nurse participants were aware of patient perceptions about nursing being an occupation for women and male nurses being perceived as sexual threats, which led to an everyday concern of potential for misinterpretation. To address this concern, male nurses engaged in a three-phase process known as assessing and managing risk in order to minimise risk and to keep themselves safe in practice. However, two contextual conditions, type of care and urgency of care, influenced engagement in assessing and managing risk. The core category and substantive grounded theory to explain these results is finding a safe way. CONCLUSIONS: Gender stereotypes affected the daily working lives of male nurses in inpatient rehabilitation. To counter the risk of misinterpretation male nurses used a range of strategies to address the barriers encountered daily in their working lives. However, male nurse efforts were often influenced by conditions outside of their control. In inpatient rehabilitation, male nurses practised cautiously to keep themselves safe in order to practise nursing.

Registered nurses' attitudes towards e-learning and technology in healthcare: A cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Online learning, also known as e-learning, has increased considerably during the COVID-19 pandemic and is now an important feature of nursing education globally. An understanding of registered nurses' online self-regulated learning, attitudes to e-learning and the relationship of these to attitudes to Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in healthcare facilitates successful educational outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To explore the association between registered nurses' attitudes to e-learning and self-regulated online learning skills on their attitudes towards the use of ICT in healthcare. DESIGN: A quantitative study employing a cross-sectional survey. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of registered nurses (n = 120) enrolled in a nursing degree conversion program delivered in Singapore. METHODS: Participants (n = 120) completed an online anonymous survey consisting of three validated instruments (Information Technology Attitude Scale for Health (ITASH), Attitudes towards e-learning and, Online Self-regulated Learning Questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Participant's levels of online self-regulated learning were positively correlated with attitudes to e-learning (r = 0.663, p < 0.001). Attitudes to e-learning (70.4, SD 11.5) were also positively predictive of ITASH (R2 = 0.306, p < 0.001), but online self-regulated learning was not contributory to the prediction of attitudes to ICT in healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: It is recommended that educators involved in online learning focus on strategies aimed at promoting positive attitudes to e-learning and ICT prior to employing those aimed at developing online self-regulation skills. Further research exploring online learning and ICT needs in the workplace are required.

The usual bowel care regimes of people living in the community with spinal cord injury and factors important for integrating bowel care into everyday life.

PURPOSE: To describe the usual bowel care regimes of people living in the community with spinal cord injury and factors important for integrating bowel care into everyday life. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Descriptive and interpretive thematic analysis of transcribed semi-structured interviews with 11 men living with spinal cord injury, aged 23-77 years, 8-45 years post injury. RESULTS: Participants had different levels and types of injuries. While there were common aspects of the bowel care routines of study participants, none was exactly the same as any other. Each had developed a routine in accordance with the needs of their own body, preferences, and convenience in relation to availability of carers and work commitments. Personal factors in the person with SCI were important for successful integration of bowel care into their everyday life. CONCLUSION: An appropriate and consistent bowel care routine was found to be significant in enabling people with spinal cord injury to experience wellness and quality in their everyday lives. Characteristics and actions of the person with SCI enabled the person to actively drive the process of integrating bowel care into their everyday life. How best to foster the development of these personal factors warrant further investigation.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONSupport for the ongoing development of self-management of bowel dysfunction expertise by people living with spinal cord injury needs to continue after discharge from hospital.Characteristics of the person with spinal cord injury, such as a state of mind indicating acceptance of their situation, motivation to avoid bowel accidents and constipation, and willingness to take responsibility, are important factors influencing the integration of bowel care into everyday life.Actions undertaken by the person with spinal cord injury, such as discipline to establish, refine and maintain a bowel care regime, and proactive self-management are important factors influencing the integration of bowel care into everyday life.This small study suggests the role of personal factors in the development of self-management expertise, for example the development of a self-management mindset and the acquisition of skills to drive that process, should be considered during rehabilitation.

Potential for misinterpretation: An everyday problem male nurses encounter in inpatient rehabilitation.

AIMS: This study aims to report on the everyday concern of the 'potential for misinterpretation', which was the basic social problem revealed in a grounded theory study exploring male nurse practice in inpatient rehabilitation in Australia. BACKGROUND: Male nurses account for approximately 10% of nursing workforce across western countries and they practice in a range of clinical areas; however, how they practice in inpatient rehabilitation remains unexplored. METHODS: Constructivist grounded theory was used in this study and was conducted in two phases: (i) involved semi-structured interviews with 11 male nurses from October 2013 to June 2014 and (ii) observation of practice of 12 male nurses and semi-structured interviews with male nurses and 15 patients from February to April 2015. RESULTS: Nurse participants encountered the intersection of two pervasive patient ideologies about male nurses. Patients perceived nursing to be women's work and that male nurses are sexual threats. These two intersecting ideologies created a concern for male nurses working in inpatient rehabilitation and that concern was labelled 'potential for misinterpretation'. CONCLUSION: Gender stereotypes impacted on the ability of male nurses to practise nursing in inpatient rehabilitation. Male nurses were mindful on a daily basis that misinterpretation could, and did, happen in inpatient rehabilitation.

Registered nurses understanding of academic honesty and the perceived relationship to professional conduct: Findings from a cross-sectional survey conducted in Southeast Asia.

BACKGROUND: Academic dishonesty is increasing in prevalence in universities globally. Concerns exist that engagement in academic dishonesty by nursing students may transfer to professional misconduct in the clinical setting, thereby jeopardising the quality of patient care. OBJECTIVES: To determine the type and prevalence of academic dishonesty engaged in by post-registration nursing students and their understanding of the relationship between academic honesty and professional conduct. DESIGN: An exploratory quantitative study employing a cross sectional survey. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of undergraduate students enrolled in an Australian post-registration nursing degree program delivered in a Southeast Asian country. METHODS: An online anonymous survey comprising 38 Likert-style items was completed by 179 voluntary participants. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse data pertaining to the frequency and type of academic dishonesty. Chi-square tests were used to identify associations between issues such as frequency of engagement to academically dishonest activities and perceptions of professional misconduct. Responses to open-ended questions was undertaken using descriptive summative content analysis. RESULTS: Almost 96% (n = 153) of participants agreed that academic dishonesty constitutes a breach of professional codes of conduct with 97.5% (n = 156) stating it should be viewed as professional misconduct. Findings revealed 44.1% (n = 79) of participants reported engagement with at least one type of academic dishonesty. Of these, 55 (69%) reported involvement in two or more types. CONCLUSIONS: Academic dishonesty continues to be an issue in nursing education with serious ramifications for professional conduct and patient outcomes. Educators must take a targeted approach to educating students about the importance of academic integrity and its relationship to professional conduct. This includes supporting students to develop academic skills such as referencing. Appropriate penalties and reporting of students who engage in academic dishonest behaviour to academic and professional regulatory authorities are also essential actions required to prevent academic dishonesty.

Problems people with spinal cord injury experience accessing help with bowel care when hospitalised outside a specialist spinal injury service.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine the nature of problems experienced by people with spinal cord injury (SCI) when accessing help to maintain recommended bowel regimes while hospitalised outside a specialist spinal injury service. BACKGROUND: Bowel dysfunction is one particularly undesirable aspect of life with a SCI, with constipation and incontinence common. DESIGN: Descriptive qualitative. METHODS: Accounts of problems encountered in hospitals in New South Wales Australia collected during interviews with 11 people living with SCI and 12 responses provided by spinal clinicians via an online survey were subjected to thematic analysis. The COREQ guidelines were followed for reporting. RESULTS: There were similarities across data collected from both sources. Individuals with SCI described instances where their bowel care needs did not fit with the pace and processes in acute hospitals. The clinician data pointed to a failure of healthcare professionals to assist people with SCI to maintain bowel care regimes recommended by specialist spinal services. Both groups described times when bowel care received was unreliable and fragmented, along with reports of staff who were unwilling and/or unable to provide the assistance required. Many and varied physical and psychosocial repercussions for individuals were associated with these system failures. In some instances, rather than restoring health, being admitted to hospital represented a significant health risk. CONCLUSION: A failure of hospital systems to meet the bowel care needs of people with SCI when hospitalised outside a specialist spinal unit was identified. System and individual factors contributed to these problems, hence addressing them requires both system and individual responses. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: If this problem is left unaddressed, the health and quality of life of people with SCI will continue to be compromised. Nursing scope of practice needs to be clarified and communicated to nurses outside specialist spinal injury units in relation to their role in maintaining bowel care regimes recommended for their patients by spinal specialists, and nurses need to ensure they possess the skills required. To allocate the time needed to provide this care, individual nurses need the support of the whole nursing team, including managers who are prepared to arrange additional staff when needed.

An examination of the nature and characteristics of patients readmitted to acute care from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation.

AIM: To describe the nature of readmission to acute care and identify patient characteristics associated with avoidable readmission to acute care from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort design. METHODS: Data prospectively documented between 1 January 2012 -31 December 2018 in local clinical and administrative database were used. Patient medical records were accessed when missing data were identified. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the nature of readmission episodes and univariate and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify patient characteristics associated with readmission to acute care. RESULTS: Of the 383 patients admitted for rehabilitation, 83 (22%) experienced readmission to acute care for a total of 171 episodes. Thirty-seven percent of readmission episodes were due to hospital acquired complications and therefore potentially avoidable. Infection accounted for 63% of hospital acquired complications. Patients with an avoidable readmission episode (N = 38) were more likely to have a significantly lower Functional Independence Measure score, be incontinent, have a tracheostomy, require a mobility aid, and be prescribed a dysphagia diet on rehabilitation admission. Patients with a tracheostomy on rehabilitation admission had a 56% probability for an avoidable readmission to acute care. CONCLUSION: Brain injury rehabilitation patients with an avoidable readmission to acute care were more likely to have a higher burden of care on rehabilitation admission and infection was the leading cause of avoidable readmission episodes. IMPACT: Research into readmission to acute care in the mixed brain injury inpatient rehabilitation population is limited. In this patient population, readmission to acute care is a contemporary issue that can occur at any time during a patient's rehabilitation admission. This study provides valuable information informing practice change for preventing avoidable readmission episodes. Locally developed policy aimed at preventing readmission episodes should include proactive prevention, early recognition of complications and discrete escalation care pathways.

Chronic Constipation in the Community: A National Survey of Australian Adults.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of chronic constipation and identify factors associated with chronic constipation in community-dwelling adults. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: The target population was community-dwelling Australian adults; 1978 participants completed an online questionnaire exploring symptoms, management, and factors potentially associated with constipation. Chronic constipation was identified using Rome III criteria. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify factors associated with chronic constipation. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic constipation was 23.9%. Factors significantly associated with chronic constipation in the multivariate model were female gender (odds ratio [OR] = 1.42, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12-1.81), current employment (OR = 1.45, 95% CI, 1.11-1.88), regular smoking (OR = 1.60, 95% CI, 1.19-2.14), poor self-rated health (OR = 2.57, 95% CI, 1.28-5.19), thyroid disease (OR = 1.77, 95% CI, 1.21-2.79), depression (OR = 1.49, 95% CI, 1.08-2.06), hemorrhoids (OR = 2.98, 95% CI, 1.84-4.83), irritable bowel syndrome (OR = 2.45, 95% CI, 1.73-3.46), and use of anti-inflammatory/antirheumatic medications (OR = 2.06, 95% CI, 1.15-3.68). In contrast to these factors, use of medications acting on the renin-angiotensin system was associated with a reduced likelihood of chronic constipation (OR = 0.47, 95% CI, 0.24-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic constipation is prevalent among community-dwelling adults. Various factors associated with chronic constipation have been identified, and knowledge of these factors may help health care professionals recognize individuals who are at high risk of chronic constipation.

Use of over-the-counter laxatives by community-dwelling adults to treat and prevent constipation: a national cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Constipation is commonly self-managed with over-the-counter laxatives. The study aim was to explore laxative choice, healthcare professional recommendations in laxative selection, and laxative effectiveness when laxatives are used for treatment and for prevention of constipation by community-dwelling adults. METHODS: A nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults in Australia was surveyed. Participants completed an online questionnaire. Z tests for differences in proportions were used to compare the proportion of laxatives by class when used either for treatment or for prevention of constipation by choice of laxative, healthcare professional recommendation, and perceived effectiveness. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 2024 participants. Laxatives were used by 37% (n = 747) of participants with 31.3% using laxatives for treatment, 19.3% for prevention, and 49.7% using laxatives for both purposes. The most common laxatives used for treatment and prevention were contact laxatives (39.8% and 31.1% respectively) and bulk-forming laxatives (34.3% and 44.6% respectively). Of all laxatives used, 56.4% of laxatives were chosen with healthcare professional recommendation, and 53.5% of laxatives were found effective. CONCLUSION: Laxatives were used both for treatment and for prevention of constipation. However, laxatives are often perceived to be ineffective and healthcare professionals are not always involved in laxative choice. Modified guidelines which address the use of laxatives for both treatment and prevention, and increased healthcare professional involvement in appropriate choice and use of laxatives, may be required to improve constipation management in the community.

A comparison of patients managed in specialist versus non-specialist inpatient rehabilitation units in Australia.

Aim: To compare the rehabilitation of patients with brain and spinal cord injury in specialist rehabilitation units and non-specialist rehabilitation units in Australia over a 10-year period.Method: A retrospective cohort study design was used. Epidemiological descriptive analysis was used to examine inpatient rehabilitation data held in the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Registry Database at four discrete time points: 2007, 2010, 2013 and 2016. Data sets included patient demographics, length of stay and the Functional Independence Measure. Data sets were examined for differences between specialist and non-specialist rehabilitation units.Results: Over the 10-year study period, compared to patients admitted to non-specialist rehabilitation units patients admitted to specialist rehabilitation units: (1) were younger and more likely to be male; (2) had a longer time between onset of illness/injury and rehabilitation admission; (3) had a longer median rehabilitation length of stay; (4) had a higher burden of care on admission to rehabilitation; however (5) had a greater functional gain. Patients in specialist rehabilitation units had a lower relative functional efficiency per day of rehabilitation, but higher percentage of Functional Independence Measure gain. In 2016, 66% of brain injury and 51% of spinal cord injury patients were not rehabilitated in specialist rehabilitation units.Conclusion: There are differences in the characteristics of patients admitted to specialist versus non-specialist rehabilitation units. Patients admitted to specialist rehabilitation units have greater functional gain. A noteworthy proportion of brain and spinal cord injury patients are not being rehabilitated in specialist rehabilitation units, particularly patients with non-traumatic injuries.Implications for rehabilitationPatients with a brain or spinal cord injury rehabilitated in specialist rehabilitation units achieve a greater functional gain than those in non-specialist units.Development of best practice admission guidelines would better enable the right care for the right patient in the right setting at the right time.There is a need for longitudinal examination of patient outcomes to better understand the long-term benefits of being rehabilitated in specialist rehabilitation units compared to non-specialist rehabilitation units.

Examination of the dependency and complexity of patients admitted to in-patient rehabilitation in Australia.

Objective The aim of this study was to determine whether there has been a measurable change in the dependency and complexity of patients admitted to in-patient rehabilitation in Australia between 2007 and 2016. Methods A retrospective cohort study design was used to examine in-patient rehabilitation data held in the Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre Registry Database for the period 2007-16. Epidemiological descriptive analysis was used to examine datasets for difference between four discrete years (2007, 2010, 2013 and 2016). Datasets included patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), comorbidities, complications and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM™). Results Between 2007 and 2016, rehabilitation in-patients as a whole: (1) had a mean decrease in total admission FIM score; (2) became more complex, as evidenced by the increased proportion of particular comorbidities impacting on rehabilitation, namely cardiac and respiratory disease, dementia, diabetes and morbid obesity; and (3) had a mean decrease in total discharge FIM score. However, there was an increase in the proportion of patients discharged home from rehabilitation (from 86.5% to 92%) and decreases in onset and rehabilitation LOS of 2.2 and 2.5 days respectively. Conclusion The dependency and complexity of patients admitted to in-patient rehabilitation in Australia has increased between 2007 and 2016. What is known about the topic? Anecdotal reports suggest that rehabilitation patients in Australia have become more complex, necessitating increased active management of their presenting health condition and comorbid health conditions. However, to date, no systematic investigation has been undertaken to examine trends in rehabilitation in-patient dependency and complexity over time. What does this paper add? This study provides measurable evidence of increased dependency and complexity in patients admitted to rehabilitation in Australia. Further, compared with 2007, rehabilitation in-patients as a whole had an increased burden of care on discharge from rehabilitation in 2016. What are the implications for practitioners? The changes in patient dependency and complexity reported in this study have implications for rehabilitation service delivery. This is because the increased need for illness or injury and comorbidity management may result in increased potential for acute complications and health deterioration, and compensatory care for patients during rehabilitation. Clinicians may need to widen their skill set to include more acute and chronic illness management.

The psychometric properties of a modified client-centred rehabilitation questionnaire in an Australian population.

Purpose: To identify the face validity of the Client-Centred Rehabilitation Questionnaire (CCRQ) and to determine the internal consistency reliability and factorial validity of a modified CCRQ.Materials and methods: This study was conducted in 2 phases. Phase 1 consisted of 5 focus groups to examine the face validity of the CCRQ, resulting in the development of a modified CCRQ. Phase 2 consisted of a multi-site cross sectional survey, involving 408 rehabilitation inpatients, to examine the internal consistency reliability and factorial validity of the modified CCRQ. Chronbach's coefficient alpha, composite reliability coefficients, and single factor congeneric models with maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis were used.Results: Based on feedback from the focus groups the CCRQ was modified with the word 'rehabilitation' replacing 'program' throughout. The three negatively worded items had poor item-to-total correlations of <0.3. Removing these items resulted in subscale alphas of 0.74-0.86 and composite reliability coefficients of 0.66-0.87. Six of the seven sub-scales had good model fit and the other one had moderate fit following removal of the negatively worded item.Conclusions: This study supports the underlying structure and internal consistency of the modified CCRQ.Implications for RehabilitationPerson-centredness is an important characteristic of effective rehabilitation service delivery that warrants measurement.A modified Client-Centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire has been found to have good face validity, internal consistency reliability and construct validity in an Australian sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients.Use of a modified Client-Centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire incorporating the 7 sub-scales in the original Client-Centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire is supported for use in inpatient rehabilitation.Both sub-scale and item level responses to the modified Client-Centered Rehabilitation Questionnaire provide detailed feedback to rehabilitation service providers looking for opportunities to make their services more person-centred.

Predictors of unplanned readmission to acute care from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To identify the predictors of unplanned readmission to acute care (RTAC) from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation and to develop a risk prediction model. BACKGROUND: RTAC from inpatient rehabilitation is not uncommon. Individual rehabilitation patient populations require their own body of evidence regarding predictors of RTAC. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Adult patients with new onset acquired brain injury admitted to a stand-alone rehabilitation facility between 1 January 2012-31 December 2018 were included in the study. The main measures were RTAC, sensitivity, specificity, the C-statistic and Youden's index. This paper is reported using the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. RESULTS: Of 383 patients admitted for rehabilitation, 83 (22%) experienced a RTAC; 69 (18%) patients had at least one unplanned RTAC episode. Patients requiring unplanned RTAC were more likely to have lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) scores on rehabilitation admission, a higher burden of care on rehabilitation discharge and be discharged to a nonhome residence. Rehabilitation admission GCS and motor FIM were identified as the independent RTAC predictors in multivariate regression modelling. The combined C-statistic was 0.86. A GCS cut-off score of ≤14 and motor FIM cut-off score of ≤40 were identified as optimal, yielding a combined Youden's index of 0.56 (sensitivity = 0.72; specificity = 0.83). CONCLUSION: Patients requiring an unplanned RTAC had a lower functional status on rehabilitation admission. A prediction model for unplanned RTAC has been developed using validated and readily available clinical measures. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The developed RTAC risk prediction model is the first step in preventing unplanned RTAC from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation. Future research should focus on discrete interventions for preventing unplanned RTAC from inpatient brain injury rehabilitation.

Appropriate Use of Laxatives in the Older Person.

Constipation is a common condition, affecting up to half of all older adults during their lifetime. Untreated constipation has significant impacts, decreasing quality of life and potentially leading to urinary and/or faecal incontinence, faecal impaction and, in severe cases, hospitalisation. The increased constipation prevalence among older populations is multifactorial, with a number of age-related factors contributing to the rise in prevalence with aging. Laxatives are the mainstay of constipation management and are commonly used among older populations for both treatment and prevention of constipation. A range of laxative types including bulk forming agents, softeners and emollients, osmotic agents, stimulants, and the newer prokinetic and secretory agents are available. Despite laxatives being freely available without prescription in many countries and commonly used by older individuals, evidence regarding the effectiveness or safety of most laxatives in older populations is lacking. Additionally, age-related changes increase the risk of adverse effects associated with laxatives, such as electrolyte disturbances, among older persons. Caution must be taken when extrapolating recommendations for general adult populations to older populations. Laxative choice for older individuals should be tailored after careful assessment and consideration of comorbid conditions, concomitant medications and the potential for adverse effects.

Predictors of Readmission to Acute Care from Inpatient Rehabilitation: An Integrative Review.

Readmission to acute care (RTAC) from inpatient rehabilitation can have negative consequences for individuals and associated financial costs are increasing. Consequently, preventing avoidable RTAC represents a target for improvement in quality of care. The aim of this integrative review was to identify predictors of RTAC from inpatient rehabilitation. A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, ProQuest, and CINAHL databases was used. Thematic analysis was used to examine extracted data. Strong evidence indicating that the principal predictors of RTAC are lower functional status on admission to rehabilitation, a more severe injury and a higher number of comorbidities was identified in this review. This is despite the heterogeneous nature of impairment groups and factors/measures examined. However, the relevance of some predictors of RTAC (such as patient demographics, invasive devices and primary diagnoses) may be dependent on rehabilitation setting, impairment group or time between rehabilitation admission and RTAC (eg, below 3 vs 30 days). Consequently, findings of this integrative review highlight that RTAC is a complex, multifactorial patient issue with a complex interplay between the predictors and reasons for RTAC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Defining constipation to estimate its prevalence in the community: results from a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Different definitions of constipation have been used to estimate its prevalence in the community but this creates difficulties when comparing results from various studies. This study explores the impact of different definitions on prevalence estimates in the same population and compares the performance of simple definitions with the Rome III criteria. METHODS: The prevalence of constipation in a large nationally representative sample of community-dwelling adults was estimated using five simple definitions of constipation and compared with definitions based on the Rome III criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values, were calculated for each definition using the Rome III criteria as the gold standards for chronic and sub-chronic constipation. RESULTS: Prevalence estimates for the five simple definitions ranged from 9.4 to 58.9%, while the prevalence estimates using the Rome III criteria were 24.0% (95%CI: 22.1, 25.9) for chronic constipation and 39.6% (95%CI: 37.5, 41.7) for sub-chronic constipation. None of the simple definitions were adequate compared to the Rome III criteria. Self-reported constipation over the past 12 months had the highest sensitivity (91.1%, 95%CI: 88.8, 93.4) and negative predictive value (94.5%, 95%CI: 93.1, 96.1) compared to the Rome III criteria for chronic constipation but an unacceptably low specificity (51.3%, 95%CI: 48.8, 53.8) and positive predictive value (37.1%, 95%CI: 34.4, 39.9). CONCLUSIONS: The definition used to identify constipation within a population has a considerable impact on the prevalence estimate obtained. Simple definitions, commonly used in research, performed poorly compared with the Rome III criteria. Studies estimating population prevalence of constipation should use definitions based on the Rome criteria where possible.

Development of the Sydney Falls Risk Screening Tool in brain injury rehabilitation: A multisite prospective cohort study.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To develop a falls risk screening tool (FRST) sensitive to the traumatic brain injury rehabilitation population. BACKGROUND: Falls are the most frequently recorded patient safety incident within the hospital context. The inpatient traumatic brain injury rehabilitation population is one particular population that has been identified as at high risk of falls. However, no FRST has been developed for this patient population. Consequently in the traumatic brain injury rehabilitation population, there is the real possibility that nurses are using falls risk screening tools that have a poor clinical utility. DESIGN: Multisite prospective cohort study. METHODS: Univariate and multiple logistic regression modelling techniques (backward elimination, elastic net and hierarchical) were used to examine each variable's association with patients who fell. The resulting FRST's clinical validity was examined. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients in the study, 41 (29%) fell. Through multiple logistic regression modelling, 11 variables were identified as predictors for falls. Using hierarchical logistic regression, five of these were identified for inclusion in the resulting falls risk screening tool: prescribed mobility aid (such as, wheelchair or frame), a fall since admission to hospital, impulsive behaviour, impaired orientation and bladder and/or bowel incontinence. The resulting FRST has good clinical validity (sensitivity = 0.9; specificity = 0.62; area under the curve = 0.87; Youden index = 0.54). The tool was significantly more accurate (p = .037 on DeLong test) in discriminating fallers from nonfallers than the Ontario Modified STRATIFY FRST. CONCLUSION: A FRST has been developed using a comprehensive statistical framework, and evidence has been provided of this tool's clinical validity. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The developed tool, the Sydney Falls Risk Screening Tool, should be considered for use in brain injury rehabilitation populations.

Emotional intelligence increases over time: A longitudinal study of Australian pre-registration nursing students.

BACKGROUND: Emotional intelligence (EI) has been associated with positive outcomes for nursing students. Higher EI is associated with personal wellbeing and stress management, higher academic performance, stronger nursing leadership and practice performance, and greater patient safety. While there is an increasing body of evidence on nursing students' EI, there is minimal evidence on EI over time during pre-registration programs. OBJECTIVES: To measure EI in pre-registration nursing students from program commencement to conclusion to ascertain EI over time and examine the relationship between EI and academic performance. DESIGN AND SETTING: Longitudinal repeated measures study between March 2010-February 2013 at a metropolitan university in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 111 nursing students (74.8% female) contributed data on at least two occasions. Participants were enrolled in a pre-registration Master of Nursing degree. Half the cohort (55.0%) comprised Graduate Entry students who completed the course in two years full time. The other 45% were enrolled in an undergraduate degree in arts, science or health science, combined with the same pre-registration Master of Nursing Degree. These students completed their Combined Degree program in four years full time. Participants had a mean age of 24.7years (SD=7.36). METHODS: EI was measured for commencing students (T1) using the Assessing Emotions Scale (AES), then a further three times: end of first year (T2; 9 months follow up); beginning of second year (12 months follow up; T3) and end of the program (T4; 24/36 months follow up). RESULTS: Students' EI was found to increase across the program; one subscale of EI (managing others' emotions) was related to higher academic performance; and there was a significant increase in the Utilising Emotions subscale scores over time. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-registration nurse education contributes to strengthening students' EI over time. Specific EI education scaffolded throughout programs is recommended in pre-registration curricula.

Final year Australian nursing students' experiences with bioscience: A cross-sectional survey.

Nursing students have reported bioscience to be challenging and difficult to understand. This might have a negative impact upon their ability to understand patients' clinical conditions and nursing practice. We sought information about students' experiences with bioscience. A total of 126 final year nursing students completed a questionnaire. The findings showed that the majority of participants considered bioscience subjects to require more work compared to nursing subjects (65.9%), and that they would like a better understanding of bioscience (73.8%), but understood that bioscience forms the foundation of nursing practice (76.2%). Younger participants without secondary school science rated bioscience harder than nursing subjects and spent more time studying bioscience compared to older participants. Participants without any secondary school science lacked an ability to apply bioscience concepts to patient conditions. These results showed that nursing students, especially those without secondary school science, would benefit from improved bioscience integration with nursing practice. Nursing and bioscience educators should consider greater alignment of bioscience with nursing practice subjects, especially earlier in the curriculum.