Suggested Guidelines for the Prescription of Orthotic Services, Device Delivery, Education, and Follow-up Care: A Multidisciplinary White Paper.

OBJECTIVES: This article establishes needed guidelines for determining orthotic prescriber authority, documenting medical necessity, and ensuring continuity of care for patients needing orthoses. It also identifies "off-the-shelf" (OTS) devices that can safely and appropriately be delivered to patients without professional adjustment as well as those that cannot. METHODS: A multidisciplinary task force made up of experts in orthopedics and physical medicine physicians, along with therapists and certified orthotists, applied a consensus approach to answer key questions: (i) When can a device be safely, effectively delivered to the patient OTS without professional guidance or education, and which caregivers have a role in that decision? (ii) What documentation is appropriate for physicians and other caregivers to determine medical necessity? (iii) What documentation/communication ensures continuity of care among physicians, therapists, and orthotists? RESULTS: Guidelines developed for consideration of OTS orthoses include accepting documentation from collaborating caregivers, including therapists and orthotists; keeping that documentation as part of the patient's total medical record for clinical, medical necessity determinations and reimbursement purposes; and using the physician's prescription for the device as the key determinant of whether a device is delivered OTS or as a custom-fitted device. CONCLUSION: This review provides expert guidance for patient safety, minimizing wasted expenditures, maximizing clinical outcomes, and providing efficient delivery of care for Medicare and other patients. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services guidelines should be directed toward recognizing the level of expertise of the orthotist, the value of their patient encounters, and their role in facilitating the timely, safe, and effective use of orthotic devices.

Knee resistance during passive stretch in patients with hypertonia.

The aims of the study were to determine by a portable method (1) whether velocity-dependent changes in knee resistance in patients with spastic paresis differ from those in non-disabled subjects, and (2) whether biomechanical measures of resistance can differentiate between neural and other factors that contribute to hypertonia (increased resistance). Biomechanical (hand-hold dynamometer, electrogoniometer) and bioelectrical (EMG) measures of resistance were evaluated under static (slow stretch) and dynamic (fast stretch) conditions in twenty patients with hypertonia and 19 non-disabled subjects. Measures calculated for non-disabled subjects (control limbs) were compared to those calculated for patients (spastic limbs). Biomechanical measures of resistance did not differ strongly between groups of spastic and control limbs and between spastic limbs having different origins of knee hypertonia (neural vs. other), due to substantial variability. In contrary the static and dynamic bioelectrical measures of muscles activation were substantially larger in spastic limbs than in control limbs (p<0.05). The variability of biomechanical measures of resistance was due to varied patterns of muscle activation in response to stretch. We concluded that the biomechanical measures of hypertonia did not discriminate spastic patients from non-disabled subjects. To classify various types of knee hypertonia, the portable method should include not only analysis of biomechanical but also EMG characteristics of hypertonia. It is expected that the functional status of patients would be better predicted using clinical and quantitative measures of impairment if different classes of hypertonia (defined by different patterns of activation) were analyzed separately rather than analyzing the heterogeneous patient population as a whole.

Biomechanic characteristics of patients with spastic and dystonic hypertonia in cerebral palsy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine what biomechanic characteristics of knee joint motion and walking show potential to quantitatively differentiate spasticity and dystonia in cerebral palsy (CP). DESIGN: Descriptive measurement study. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seventeen pediatric and adult patients with CP. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured the resistance of the knee joint at different velocities and positions, maximum muscle activation during external motion, amplitude of knee tendon reflexes, maximum isometric flexion and extension torques, velocity of walking, and knee kinematics during the gait cycle. Patients were classified into 2 groups (dystonia or spasticity) if at least 2 of 3 physicians agreed that a prominent component of dystonia was present. RESULTS: Patients with dystonia had a greater degree of co-contraction and an increased resistance to external motion at slow velocities. The tendon reflexes were almost normal in patients with dystonia, whereas they were increased in patients with spasticity. Muscle strength was more impaired in patients with dystonia, probably as a result of greater muscle co-contraction. They also walked slower, with smaller knee ranges of motion, during the stance phase of walking. CONCLUSIONS: The measurement of resistance and of muscle activation during passive motion and tendon reflexes shows potential to differentiate dystonia from spasticity in CP patients with a mixed form of hypertonia. More studies are needed to confirm these results.