Clinical fellowship for an innovative, integrated BSN-PhD program: An academic and practice partnership.

Opportunities for research-focused doctoral education must be available to nurses early in their careers in order to ensure the further development of nursing science. Early entry into the research doctorate through an integrated BSN-PhD program is one innovative approach. This approach highlights the value of integrating post-licensure clinical training into the doctoral curriculum. To better prepare innovative nurse scientists early in their careers we developed a clinical nurse fellowship within an integrated BSN-PhD program in partnership with an affiliated health system. The aims of this clinical fellowship are to integrate post-licensure clinical experience with academic preparation, cultivate scholarly reflection on the connections between research and practice, educate nurse researchers to work effectively in interdisciplinary teams, and develop nurses' contributions to health care innovation. Major considerations for the development of similar clinical training opportunities include clarifying and articulating the major aims of the fellowship, enlisting the support of executive clinical leadership, and placing fellows on nursing units with experienced and advanced nursing teams and management that supports the fellowship's aims. We emphasize the fully integrated and collaborative activities, decision-making, and commitment required of both academic and health system partners to successfully implement similar clinical training opportunities.

Resident and RN perceptions of the impact of a medical emergency team on education and patient safety in an academic medical center.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceptions of residents and RNs about the effects of a medical emergency team on patient safety and their own educational experiences. DESIGN: Survey-based study. SETTING: A single academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS: In 2007, 1 yr after the introduction of a medical emergency team, a Web-based survey was administered to 141 internal medicine and general surgery residents and 497 RNs in a single academic medical center. Residents' and RNs' beliefs about the effects of the medical emergency team on patient safety and education were measured using 12 Likert scale items. Group differences were assessed using Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 79% (67% for residents and 83% for RNs). Residents and RNs agreed that the medical emergency team improved patient safety, but RNs held this belief more strongly than did residents. Residents neither agreed nor disagreed with the notion that the creation of the medical emergency team decreased their opportunities to obtain critical care skills or education, whereas RNs disagreed with this statement. Relative to surgical residents, medical residents were more involved in activation of the medical emergency team and believed more strongly that the team improved patient safety. Residents and RNs who perceived that they were involved in the call activation had more positive attitudes toward the team. CONCLUSION: Residents and RNs believe that a medical emergency team improves patient safety in the hospital without compromising educational experiences or skills. Frequency of involvement in the events and the decision to activate the team correlated with more positive attitudes.

The use of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in trauma: implications for the trauma team.

Prevention of venothromboembolic complications remains a challenge in trauma care. Guidelines for prophylaxis published by the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma stratify patients by risk and recommend therapies based on scientific evidence. New innovations such as retrievable inferior vena cava filters are being used by trauma surgeons for patients at risk for pulmonary embolism but in whom anticoagulation is contraindicated. Some available devices offer a limited timeframe for retrieval beyond which the device becomes permanent. The increased utilization of this technology presents case management challenges to trauma teams. Patients who are unreliable or may be difficult to track posthospitalization (homeless, migrant workers, prison system, etc.) run the risk of not having their filters removed as initially intended. Nurses can play a critical role in helping to manage and direct the discharge plan and case management of trauma patients with retrievable inferior vena cava filters.

Maintaining patient throughput on an evolving trauma/emergency surgery service.

BACKGROUND: The case-management team (CMT) has been an effective tool to decrease denied days and improve hospital throughput on a trauma service. With the addition of emergency general surgery (EGS) to our practice, we reviewed the ability of the case management team to absorb EGS patients on the inpatient trauma service while maintaining the improvements initially realized. METHODS: An interdisciplinary CMT was implemented in January 1999. CRNPs were added in August 2003 to address the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident work-hour restrictions. "Key communications" for each CMT member are reported three times per week as defined by a hospital-approved policy. Beginning in August 2001, the trauma service was expanded to include EGS patients. Data from the trauma registry, hospital utilization review, and finance office were analyzed before (1998 and 1999) and after (2003 and 2004) the addition of EGS. Tests of proportion were used to evaluate questions of interest. RESULTS: The number of injured patients admitted to the trauma service remained relatively constant during the study periods, ranging from a high of 1,365 in 1999 to a low of 1,116 in 2003. Beginning in 2003, the influx of emergency surgery patients to the service was marked. By 2004, there were 561 emergency surgery admissions, representing more than 30% of the total service admissions. As a result, the total number of service admissions has dramatically increased, reaching 1,833 in CY 2004, a 56% increase from CY 1998 levels. Hospital length of stay data varied from a low of 5.5 days in CY 1999 to a high of 6.9 days in CY 2003. Length of stay appeared to be associated with injury severity (mean Injury Severity Score 11.8 in 1999 and 13.1 in 2003) and case mix, but not associated with denied days. The percent of denied days decreased over the study periods, from 4.6% in 1998 (before the implementation of the CMT) to 0.5% in 2004 (p<0.01). The percent of readmissions also fell significantly over the study periods (4.0% in 1998 to 1.8% in 2004; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The initial improvements in patient throughput noted after the introduction of a CMT in January 1999 have been maintained in recent years despite the addition of an EGS component to the trauma service. Percent denied days and readmissions have continued to decrease. The length of stay for these patients remains, in part, dependent on other factors. The CMT plays an integral role in maintaining the efficiency of a trauma/emergency surgery service.

Experience with the recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava filter.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates clinical experience with the Recovery filter as a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seven Recovery filters were placed in 106 patients with an initial clinical indication for temporary caval filtration. Patients were followed up to assess filter efficacy, complications, eventual need for filter removal, time to retrieval, and ability to remove the filter. RESULTS: The patient cohort consisted of 62 men and 44 women with a mean age of 48 years (range, 18-90 y). Mean implantation time was 165 days. Indications for filter placement in patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) included contraindication to anticoagulation (n = 33), complications of anticoagulation (n = 8), poor cardiopulmonary reserve (n = 6), large clot burden (n = 3), and PE while receiving anticoagulation (n = 1). Indications for filter placement in patients without proven PE or DVT included immobility after trauma (n = 35); recent intracranial hemorrhage, neurosurgery, or brain tumor (n = 18); and other surgical or invasive procedure (n = 3). Three patients (2.8%) had symptomatic PE after placement of the Recovery filter. No caval thromboses were detected. No symptomatic filter migrations occurred. Recovery filter removal was attempted in 15 of 106 patients (14%) at a mean of 150 days after placement. The Recovery filter was successfully retrieved in 14 of 15 patients (93%); one removal was unsuccessful at 210 days after placement. Ninety-two filters (87%) currently remain in place. CONCLUSIONS: Although all the filters were placed with the intention of being removed, a large percentage of filters were not retrieved. The Recovery filter was safe and effective in preventing PE when used as a retrievable IVC filter.