Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
AACE Clin Case Rep ; 2023 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37363439

ABSTRACT

Background/Objective: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) during pregnancy is an obstetric emergency associated with a higher rate of maternofetal morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy itself is a ketosis-prone state and several unique mechanisms predispose to the development of insulin resistance, which can be further exacerbated by acute stressors such as infection. Thus, pregnant patients who additionally contract COVID-19 may be at an even higher risk of development of DKA. Case Report: A 32-year-old patient, with no prior history of impaired glucose tolerance, presented at 27 weeks of gestation with a 3-day history of shortness of breath, congestion, loss of taste and smell, polyuria, and polydipsia. Biochemical evaluation was consistent with DKA. Subsequently, she was diagnosed with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection. Treatment included intravenous hydration, electrolyte replacement, and insulin infusion. Postpartum phenotypic evaluation confirmed autoimmune diabetes (positive GAD-65 and zinc T8 antibodies) with residual ß-cell function. Six months postpartum, glycemic control remains at goal with basal- bolus insulin regimen. Discussion: This case describes the peculiar ability of SARS-CoV-2 infection to potentially rouse autoimmunity and how COVID-19 and DKA in pregnancy can be particularly challenging given the risk of significant maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Conclusion: Prompt diagnosis and evaluation of DKA in pregnancy as well as a higher level of suspicion is needed in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, this case depicts the need for closely monitoring the postpartum period for patients at risk of autoimmune disease, which may have been blunted in pregnancy.

2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 139(5): 821-831, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35576341

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To characterize gynecology clinical trials over time, compare gynecology subspecialties, and analyze factors associated with early discontinuation, results reporting, and publication. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all gynecology trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between 2007 and 2020 and their resulting publications. Trials were analyzed with descriptive, multivariable logistic, and Cox regression analyses. Primary exposure variables were trial funding and subspecialty. The three primary outcomes included early discontinuation, results reporting to ClinicalTrials.gov, and publication in a peer-reviewed journal indexed on PubMed. RESULTS: Of 223,690 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov between October 2007 and March 2020, only 3.7% focused on gynecology (n=8,174, approximately 3,759,086 participants). Subspecialties included reproductive endocrinology and infertility (n=1,428, 17.5%), gynecologic oncology (n=2,063, 25.2%), urogynecology (n=1,118, 13.7%), family planning (n=648, 7.9%), and other benign gynecology (n=2,917, 35.7%). Only 42.0% of completed trials disseminated results through results reporting and publication. Of all funding types, industry-funded trials were the most likely to be discontinued early (P<.001). Academic-funded trials were the least likely to report results (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.38, 95% CI 0.30-0.50) but the most likely to publish (aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.24-2.12). The number of reproductive endocrinology and infertility trials increased the most of any subspecialty between 2007 and 2020 (6.4% growth rate). Reproductive endocrinology and infertility and family planning trials were the most likely to be stopped early (reproductive endocrinology and infertility: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.08, 95% CI 1.59-2.71; family planning: aHR 1.55 95% CI 1.06-2.25). When completed, reproductive endocrinology and infertility trials were the least likely to report results (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88). No significant differences were seen between subspecialties with respect to publication. CONCLUSION: Gynecology trials comprise only 3.7% of all clinical trials. The paucity of gynecology clinical trials aligns with decades of female underrepresentation in research. When completed, gynecology trials have poor dissemination. Our findings raise concern about bias in the performance, reporting, and publication of gynecology clinical trials.


Subject(s)
Gynecology , Infertility , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Odds Ratio , Research Report
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...