Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Endod ; 34(3): 251-7, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18291270

ABSTRACT

The choice of one-visit versus two-visit root canal therapy for necrotic teeth with apical periodontitis is a source of current debate. The primary objective of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to compare radiographic evidence of periapical healing after root canal therapy completed in one visit or two visits with an interim calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine paste dressing. Ninety-seven patients met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to either the one-visit or two-visit group, and root canal therapy was performed with a standardized protocol. Patients in the two-visit group received an intracanal dressing of calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine paste. Sixty-three patients, 33 in the one-visit group and 30 in the two-visit group, were evaluated at 12 months. The primary outcome measure was change in apical bone density by using the periapical index (PAI). Secondary outcome measures were proportion of teeth healed or improved in each group. Both groups exhibited equally favorable periapical healing at 12 months, with no statistically significant differences between groups.


Subject(s)
Dental Pulp Necrosis/therapy , Office Visits , Periapical Periodontitis/therapy , Root Canal Therapy/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Alveolar Bone Loss/diagnostic imaging , Anti-Infective Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Regeneration , Calcium Hydroxide , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Dental Restoration, Temporary , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Periodontal Index , Radiography , Root Canal Filling Materials , Treatment Outcome , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...