Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Grad Med Educ ; 2(4): 541-7, 2010 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22132275

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is widely acknowledged that there is need for redesign of internal medicine training. Duty hour restrictions, an increasing focus on patient safety, the possibility of inadequate training in ambulatory care, and a growing shortage of primary care physicians are some factors that fuel this redesign movement. INTERVENTION: We implemented a 4∶1 scheduling template that alternates traditional 4-week rotations with week-long ambulatory blocks. Annually, this provides 10 blocks of traditional rotations without continuity clinic sessions and 10 weeks of ambulatory experience without inpatient responsibilities. To ensure continuous resident presence in all areas, residents are divided into 5 groups, each staggered by 1 week. EVALUATION: We surveyed residents and faculty before and after the intervention, with questions focused on attitudes toward ambulatory medicine and training. We also conducted focus groups with independent groups of residents and faculty, designed to assess the benefits and drawbacks of the new scheduling template and to identify areas for future improvement. RESULTS: Overall, the scheduling template minimized the conflicts between inpatient and outpatient training, promoted a stronger emphasis on ambulatory education, allowed for focused practice during traditional rotations, and enhanced perceptions of team development. By creating an immersion experience in ambulatory training, the template allowed up to 180 continuity clinic sessions during 3 years of training and provided improved educational continuity and continuity of patient care. CONCLUSION: Separating inpatient and ambulatory education allows for enhanced modeling of the evolving practice of internists and removes some of the conflict inherent in the present system.

2.
Acad Med ; 82(12): 1211-9, 2007 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18046131

ABSTRACT

Because of numerous criticisms of the content and structure of residency training, redesigning graduate medical education (GME) has become a high priority for the internal medicine community. From 2005 to 2007, the leadership of the internal medicine community, working under the auspices of the Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine Education Redesign Task Force, developed six recommendations it will pursue to improve residency education: (1) focus education around a "core" of internal medicine, which provides the framework for both the structure and content of residents' educational experiences, (2) fully adopt competency-based evaluation and advancement, which will enhance training by focusing on individual learners' needs, (3) allow for increased, resident-centered education beyond the internal medicine core, because different types of practice require customized knowledge and skills, (4) improve ambulatory training by providing patient-centered longitudinal care that addresses the conflict between inpatient and outpatient responsibilities, (5) use new faculty models that emphasize the creation of a core faculty, and (6) align institutional and programmatic resources with the goals of redesign, balancing the clinical mission of the institution with the educational goals of residency training. Adoption of these recommendations will require significant efforts, including pilot projects, faculty development, changes in accreditation requirements, and modifications of GME funding systems. Opportunities are ample for individual programs to develop creative approaches based on the framework for educational redesign outlined in this article, and for these educational and clinical redesign initiatives to work hand-in-hand for the benefit of patients, faculty, trainees, and institutions.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Models, Educational , Ambulatory Care , Career Choice , Curriculum , Faculty, Medical/standards , Humans , Inpatients , Quality of Health Care , United States
3.
Am J Med Qual ; 22(2): 85-94, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17395963

ABSTRACT

This research estimates the benefits associated with percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated at hospitals in Pennsylvania. We studied 31 351 patients with AMI in Pennsylvania during the year 2000, including 10 170 who received PCI. Univariate comparisons between groups were made using chi2 tests for categorical outcomes and Student's t tests for continuous outcomes. A logit model for proportions was used to model the relationship between mortality and the proportion of AMI patients who received PCI. The mortality rate for patients undergoing PCI was significantly lower than for those being treated medically (1.4% vs 15.8%, P<.0001). Furthermore, significant survival benefits associated with PCI persisted when patients were stratified by age, sex, type of infarction, and severity at admission. At the hospital level, higher rates of PCI were associated with a significantly lower overall mortality rate among patients with AMI (P<.0001).


Subject(s)
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Demography , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Pennsylvania , Severity of Illness Index , Thrombolytic Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
5.
Ann Intern Med ; 144(12): 920-6, 2006 Jun 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16785480

ABSTRACT

There has been considerable change in the practice of internal medicine in the past quarter century, including the rise of specialization, increasing time pressure, the hospitalist movement, and the rapidly changing responsibilities of internists in inpatient and outpatient settings. Training programs have not adequately responded to these trends, and there is a consensus that the residency education system urgently needs redesign.


Subject(s)
Internal Medicine/education , Internship and Residency , Models, Educational , Ambulatory Care , Curriculum , Education, Medical, Graduate/economics , Faculty, Medical/standards , Financing, Organized , Hospitals, Teaching/economics , Hospitals, Teaching/standards , Humans , Inpatients , Internship and Residency/economics , Internship and Residency/standards , Quality of Health Care , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...