Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Craniofac Surg ; 19(3): 609-15, 2008 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18520372

ABSTRACT

Procedures to relieve airway obstruction in Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) include glossopexy, mandibular distraction, and tracheostomy. Previously, it has been suggested that the imbalance of the genioglossus insertion on the mandible could be responsible for the micrognathia, tongue elevation, and glossoptosis seen in PRS. We performed a retrospective study to determine the usefulness of subperiosteal release of the floor of the mouth in PRS with airway problems. Between 1991 and 2005, 14 consecutive patients with PRS were treated with subperiosteal release of the floor of the mouth performed at the British Columbia's Children's Hospital. There were 8 boys and 6 girls. Mean age at surgery was 15 weeks (range, 1-68 weeks). Postoperative follow-up ranged from 8 months to 13 years. Seven patients (4 boys and 3 girls) were successfully treated, and a tracheostomy was prevented. Fifty-five percent of the syndromic patients needed a tracheostomy, whereas 1 patient (33%) with isolated PRS needed a tracheostomy. The most common syndrome associated with PRS was Stickler syndrome. Five (72%) of the 7 patients who required a tracheostomy were boys. If conservative measures fail to relieve supraglottic airway obstruction seen in patients with PRS, a subperiosteal release of the floor of the mouth can be an effective intervention in certain patients. It is a simple intervention with few complications and little morbidity. More investigations are mandatory to precisely define patient characteristics ideal for this intervention.


Subject(s)
Airway Obstruction/surgery , Mouth Floor/surgery , Oral Surgical Procedures/methods , Pierre Robin Syndrome/surgery , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Neck Muscles/surgery , Periosteum/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Tongue/surgery , Tracheostomy
2.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 81(1): 74-8, 2005 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15640463

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is widely used in clinics and research to measure body composition. However, the results of BIA validation with reference methods are contradictory, and few data are available on the influence of adiposity on the measurement of body composition by BIA. OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine the effects of sex and adiposity on the difference in percentage body fat (%BF) predicted by BIA compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DESIGN: A total of 591 healthy subjects were recruited in Newfoundland and Labrador. %BF was predicted by using BIA and was compared with that measured by DXA. Methods agreement was assessed by Pearson's correlation and Bland and Altman analysis. Differences in %BF among groups based on sex and adiposity were analyzed by using one-factor analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Correlations between BIA and DXA were 0.88 for the whole population, 0.78 for men, and 0.85 for women. The mean %BF determined by BIA (32.89 +/- 8.00%) was significantly lower than that measured by DXA (34.72 +/- 8.66%). The cutoffs were sex specific. BIA overestimated %BF by 3.03% and 4.40% when %BF was <15% in men and <25% in women, respectively, and underestimated %BF by 4.32% and 2.71% when %BF was >25% in men and >33% in women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BIA is a good alternative for estimating %BF when subjects are within a normal body fat range. BIA tends to overestimate %BF in lean subjects and underestimate %BF in obese subjects.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon , Body Composition , Electric Impedance , Adipose Tissue , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Newfoundland and Labrador , Waist-Hip Ratio
3.
Can J Surg ; 46(3): 223-4, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12812250

ABSTRACT

A potential problem with the standard method of skin closure in pediatric surgery is the development of a skin abscess. To avoid this problem, we introduce a new stitch--the L-stitch. The technique involves passing the suture subcuticularly at the end of the incision and redirecting the needle at a 90 degree angle from the previous suture, before bringing it out to the skin surface. This stitch can be used in place of the initial and finishing knot of a running suture. It takes less time to perform than a square or a surgeon's knot and is less bulky. This technique is straightforward and, when used in conjunction with adhesive skin closure strips, provides strong, reliable skin closure, yielding excellent cosmetic results.


Subject(s)
Abscess/prevention & control , Skin Diseases/prevention & control , Suture Techniques , Child , Humans , Sutures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...