Social support in the post-abortion recovery room: evidence from patients, support persons and nurses in a Vancouver clinic.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of social support in post-surgical recovery are well documented; social support decreases preoperative stress and postoperative recovery time. However, a paucity of studies have examined the effect of social support in the context of pregnancy termination. This study is the first to examine the effect of postoperative accompaniment from the patient, support person and nurses' perspective. STUDY DESIGN: This study was carried out in two phases. In Phase I, no accompaniment was allowed in the post-anesthesia recovery room (PAR); in Phase II, accompaniment was permitted. All participants completed pre- and postoperative questionnaires. RESULTS: The perception of accompaniment was overwhelmingly positive in patients and support people. Patients in Phase II demonstrated a high (over 95%) acceptance of accompaniment in the recovery room. It was found that 96.8% reported they would choose to be accompanied in the recovery room again if they had to have another abortion. Support persons felt very strongly that their presence was helpful to the patient. The decrease in pre- to postoperative anxiety levels was significantly greater in those women who were accompanied. However, overall, nurses demonstrated a negative attitude towards accompaniment in the recovery room. CONCLUSION: In summary, the presence of a support person in the PAR was perceived in a positive manner by patients and support people. However, the reasoning behind the negative opinion of nurses requires further study before PAR accompaniment can be considered a possibility in the context of pregnancy termination.

A review of physician anaesthesia prescribing practices in an abortion clinic in British Columbia.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to review the standard prescribing practices of physicians providing local anaesthesia in a major abortion clinic in British Columbia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent a first trimester surgical abortion at the Comprehensive Abortion and Reproductive Education (CARE) Program at BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre during 2004 (n = 1546). Patients' demographics and reproductive history including age, weight, gestational age, and gravidity were recorded. Main outcomes recorded were dosage of lidocaine administered and amount of conscious sedation (midazolam and fentanyl) administered for pain management. Incidence of toxicity was also recorded. RESULTS: Almost one half (49.9%) of the patients received 20 mL of 0.5% lidocaine, and the remainder received 20 mL of 1.0% lidocaine. The volume of conscious sedation did not differ between groups. There was a positive correlation computed between midazolam and fentanyl dosages (r = 0.583, P < 0.01). Neither was significantly associated with gravidity. Gestational age was associated with both midazolam and fentanyl dose (r = 0.05, P = 0.047; r = 0.06, P = 0.024). There was no reported incidence of toxicity. CONCLUSION: Similar doses of midazolam and fentanyl were administered to patients regardless of the amount of lidocaine given (20 mL of either 0.5% or 1.0%). Further investigation is required to assess whether fentanyl and midazolam doses used during procedures can be used as surrogate measurements of pain. Our findings suggest it would be reasonable to consider using a lower dose of local anaesthetic for first trimester abortions to further reduce the risk of toxicity.