Implantation of a left ventricular assist device to provide long-term support for end-stage Duchenne muscular dystrophy-associated cardiomyopathy.

A young man with Duchenne muscular dystrophy presented to the UT Southwestern Neuromuscular Cardiomyopathy Clinic with advanced heart failure. Despite maximal medical therapy, his cardiac function continued to decline requiring initiation of inotrope therapy. Given the patient's clinical deterioration, a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) was implanted as destination therapy after undergoing a multidisciplinary assessment. The patient tolerated the surgical implantation of the LVAD without any significant complications, and he has had a relatively unremarkable course 38 months post-LVAD implantation. A critical factor contributing to the long-term success of this patient was the decision to select an LVAD that would not disrupt the diaphragm and thus preserve the respiratory muscle strength. This case demonstrates that permanent mechanical LVADs should be considered for appropriately selected Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients with medically refractory end-stage cardiomyopathy.

Restoration of Pulsatile Flow Reduces Sympathetic Nerve Activity Among Individuals With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

BACKGROUND: Current-generation left ventricular assist devices provide circulatory support that is minimally or entirely nonpulsatile and are associated with marked increases in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), likely through a baroreceptor-mediated pathway. We sought to determine whether the restoration of pulsatile flow through modulations in pump speed would reduce MSNA through the arterial baroreceptor reflex. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten men and 3 women (54 ± 14 years) with Heartmate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices underwent hemodynamic and sympathetic neural assessment. Beat-to-beat blood pressure, carotid ultrasonography at the level of the arterial baroreceptors, and MSNA via microneurography were continuously recorded to determine steady-state responses to step changes (200-400 revolutions per minute) in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device pump speed from a maximum of 10,480 ± 315 revolutions per minute to a minimum of 8500 ± 380 revolutions per minute. Reductions in pump speed led to increases in pulse pressure (high versus low speed: 17 ± 7 versus 26 ± 12 mm Hg; P<0.01), distension of the carotid artery, and carotid arterial wall tension (P<0.05 for all measures). In addition, MSNA was reduced (high versus low speed: 41 ± 15 versus 33 ± 16 bursts per minute; P<0.01) despite a reduction in mean arterial pressure and was inversely related to pulse pressure (P=0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Among subjects with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices, the restoration of pulsatile flow through modulations in pump speed leads to increased distortion of the arterial baroreceptors with a subsequent decline in MSNA. Additional study is needed to determine whether reduction of MSNA in this setting leads to improved outcomes.

In-hospital cardiopulmonary arrests in patients with left ventricular assist devices.

UNLABELLED: Background: Basic and advanced cardiac life support guidelines do not address resuscitation of patients with continuous-flow (CF) left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). As the population of LVAD patients increases, it becomes important to understand how to provide emergency care to such patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive series of patients with an implanted CF-LVAD who had an in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest at our medical center from January 2011 to October 2013. We compared them with a matched cohort of patients without LVADs who had an inhospital cardiopulmonary arrest during the same time period. Code documentation was used to determine arrest characteristics, perfusion assessment techniques, and time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) initiation. There were 415 in-hospital arrests during the study period, and 4% (n 5 16) occurred in patients with CF-LVADs. Response teams used various approaches to assess arterial perfusion, including palpation or Doppler of the arterial pulse and measurement of blood pressure by Doppler or arterial line. Nine of the 16 patients required CPR, but only 5 (56%) received CPR in !2 minutes. In the control group (n 5 32) of patients without an LVAD, 22 received CPR, which was initiated within 2 minutes in all (100%) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiopulmonary arrests in LVAD patients accounted for 4% of all arrests in our center. We identified important time delays in CPR initiation, highlighting the need to develop resuscitation guidelines for this patient population.

Sensitivity, ventricular assist devices, and the waiting game in heart transplantation: what's new?

Orthotopic heart transplantation became more successful with the introduction of cyclosporine in the late 1970s. Although congestive heart failure has become a significant public health issue and the proportion of patients with advanced heart failure has increased, the number of heart transplants performed has not increased substantially in the past decade. Transplant waiting times have been related to many different factors. Unfortunately, implantation of ventricular assist devices (VADS) may provoke antibody responses. These result in the sensitization of patients and increased waiting time prior to transplantation. The purpose of this article is to explore etiologies of waiting times for pre heart transplant and left ventricular assist device pre heart transplant candidates, explain new theories of sensitization, define current methods to detect sensitization, and discuss nursing care implications.