Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hand Surg Rehabil ; 42(2): 115-120, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36681326

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to define radiological measurements for quantifying the position of a surface replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP) in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, to test the reliability of these measurements, and to explore whether implant position influences patient-reported and clinical outcomes one year after surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We developed 7 radiographic measurements to quantify the position of the proximal and distal implant components. Two independent surgeons analyzed the 1-year postoperative radiographs of 63 fingers documented in our registry. Inter-rater reliability of these measurements was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations between the radiographic measurements and PIP range of motion (ROM), the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), and pain were determined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Radiographic measurements of patients with the worst and best postoperative ROM were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was only good for 1 measurement (ICC = 0.89), but poor to moderate for the other measurements (ICC ranging from 0.34 to 0.69). These measurements neither correlated with ROM, brief MHQ nor pain based on correlation coefficients ranging from 0.00 to 0.31. There were no relevant differences in the radiographic measurements between patients with the worst and best ROM. CONCLUSION: The position of the CapFlex-PIP implant could not be reliably quantified on plain radiographs. The lack of correlations between implant position and postoperative outcomes can be attributed either to the unreliable measurements or the actual lack of influence of the implant position on pain and function.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Finger , Joint Prosthesis , Osteoarthritis , Humans , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Osteoarthritis/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Finger Joint/diagnostic imaging , Finger Joint/surgery
2.
Hand Surg Rehabil ; 41(3): 341-346, 2022 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35189401

ABSTRACT

Recently, biodegradable implants made from magnesium (Mg) alloys have been developed to obviate the need for later implant removal. Mg-based cannulated compression screws (CCS) are ideal for intramedullary screw (IMS) fixation of metacarpal fractures. The present study aimed at investigating the torque acting on Mg-based CCS at failure and at intramedullary metacarpal insertion. The devices were CE certified Magnezix 2.7 and 3.2 mm CCSs (Syntellix®, Hannover, Germany). Torque at failure was measured in a synthetic bone model using a standardized polyurethane foam block. In a second assessment, insertional torque was measured in ten cadaveric metacarpal bones. Mean torque at failure for the 2.7 mm and 3.2 mm CCSs was 42.8 Ncm (±1.9 Ncm) and 63.0 Ncm (±2.2 Ncm), respectively. In the human cadaver model, the torque distribution curve at metacarpal insertion showed three peaks. The highest reached 53.6% of the lowest torque at failure measured in the synthetic bone model for the 3.2 CCS (31.4 vs. 58.6 Ncm). The mean difference between peak torque at metacarpal insertion and torque at failure was 38.3 Ncm (99% CI [33.6, 43.0 Ncm], p < 0.0001). In terms of torque load, Mg-based CCSs are suitable for IMS fixation of metacarpal fractures. Biodegradable implants may represent an important improvement of this treatment method; confirmation by in-vivo studies is needed.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Metacarpal Bones , Biomechanical Phenomena , Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Humans , Magnesium , Metacarpal Bones/surgery , Torque
3.
Hand Surg Rehabil ; 40(5): 622-630, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33933635

ABSTRACT

Intramedullary screw (IMS) fixation is increasingly used as an alternative treatment option in metacarpal and phalangeal fractures of the hand. However, this technique is currently the subject of controversy among hand surgeons. The aim of this systematic review was to gain insight on radiological, functional and patient-rated outcomes reported in literature. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL databases was conducted on March 1st, 2021. All studies reporting on fracture union, complications, and functional and patient-rated outcome in IMS fixation of metacarpal and/or phalangeal fractures were selected. Two prospective and 16 retrospective cohort studies were included, encompassing a total of 837 patients with 958 fractures (693 metacarpal, 222 proximal phalangeal and 43 middle phalangeal). Mean surgery duration was 26.4 min (range 5-60 min). Union was ultimately achieved in all fractures in a mean of 5.7 weeks (range 2-12 weeks). The procedure-related complication rate was 3.2%. The most frequently reported complication was limitation of joint motion, occurring in 2.0% of cases. Incidence of other complications, including loss of reduction, infection and screw protrusion did not exceed 1%. Overall mean total active motion averaged 243° and grip strength reached 97.5% of the contralateral side. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score averaged 3.7 points. Duration of sick leave was 7.3 weeks. According to the findings of this systematic review, IMS fixation is a time-saving and safe minimally invasive solution for both metacarpal and phalangeal fractures, with a low rate of complications and promising functional and patient-rated results.


Subject(s)
Metacarpal Bones , Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Humans , Metacarpal Bones/surgery , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Upper Extremity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...