High number of hypoglycaemic episodes identified by CGM among home-dwelling older people with diabetes: an observational study in Norway.

BACKGROUND: A scoping review from 2021 identified a lack of studies on the incidence, prevention and management of hypoglycaemia in home-dwelling older people with diabetes. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency and duration of hypoglycaemic episodes measured by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in older people with diabetes who received home care and who were treated with glucose-lowering medications, and to compare the frequency and duration of hypoglycaemic episodes between subgroups of the study population according to demographic and clinical variables. METHODS: This was an observational study investigating the occurrence of hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes aged ≥ 65 years. Data were collected using blinded continuous glucose monitoring (CGM, iPro2) for 5 consecutive days. Frequency and duration of hypoglycaemic episodes were assessed using a sensor glucose cut-off value of 3.9 mmol/L. A blood sample for measurement of HbA1c and creatinine-based eGFR (CKD-EPI) was obtained during the monitoring period. Demographic and clinical data were collected from electronic patient records. RESULTS: Fifty-six individuals were enrolled (median age 82 years and 52% were men). Of the 36 participants who were treated with insulin, 33% had at least one hypoglycaemic episode during the five-day period. Among 18 participants who neither used insulin nor sulfonylurea, but other glucose-lowering medications, 44% had at least one hypoglycaemicepisode. Of those with hypoglycaemic episodes, 86% lived alone. The median duration of the hypoglycaemia was 1 h and 25 min, ranging from 15 min to 8 h and 50 min. CONCLUSION: This study identified an unacceptably high number of unknown hypoglycaemic episodes among older home-dwelling people with diabetes receiving home care, even among those not using insulin or sulfonylurea. The study provides essential knowledge that can serve as a foundation to improve the treatment and care for this vulnerable patient group. The routines for glucose monitoring and other prevention tasks need to be considered more comprehensively, also, among those treated with glucose-lowering medications other than insulin.

Lasting impact of an implemented self-management programme for people with type 2 diabetes referred from primary care: a one-group, before-after design.

BACKGROUND: Research interventions in uniform clinical settings and in patients fulfilling well-defined inclusion criteria might show a more pronounced effect than implementing the same intervention in existing practice. Diabetes Self-Management Education (DSME) is complex, and should be assessed in existing practice as it is an intervention widely implemented. OBJECTIVES: To examine the impact of an established group-based DSME in unselected people with type 2 diabetes referred from primary care. METHOD: A one-group, before-after design was used for assessments before, immediately after, and 3 months after participation in a group-based DSME programme conducted at two Learning and Mastering Centres in Norway between November 2013 and June 2014. Participants completed a questionnaire before (n = 115), immediately after (n = 95) and 3 months after (n = 42) the DSME programme. Primary outcome measure was diabetes knowledge (Michigan Diabetes Knowledge Test). Also patient activation (Patient Activation Measure [PAM]) and self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy scale [GSE]) were measured. Changes in outcome measures were analysed using paired t-tests for normally distributed data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for skewed data. RESULTS: Mean knowledge improved significantly from baseline (p < 0.001). Changes persisted at the 3-month assessment. Mean PAM scores improved significantly from baseline (p < 0.001), and changes persisted for 3 months. Mean GSE scores improved from baseline (p = 0.022) and persisted for 3 months. However, when results were stratified for participants who responded at all three time points, GSE showed no change during the study period. CONCLUSION: The complexity self-management in the individual is challenging to reflect in DSME. This implemented DSME programme for people with type 2 diabetes improved levels of diabetes knowledge and patient activation, persisting for at least 3 months. Hence, the DSME programme appears to be robust beyond standardised research settings, in educating unselected diabetes patients referred from primary care.