Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Br J Haematol ; 180(1): 60-70, 2018 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29164606

ABSTRACT

Immunomodulatory drugs including thalidomide, lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM), are effective for treating multiple myeloma (MM). POM has shown enhanced efficacy with dexamethasone (DEX). Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with bortezomib is US Food and Drug Administration-approved for treating MM. PLD with LEN or thalidomide has shown efficacy for MM patients. LEN with DEX, PLD and bortezomib achieves high response rates. We evaluated the combination of POM with DEX 40 mg and PLD 5 mg/m2 with the latter two drugs administered on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 on a 28-day cycle for the treatment of relapsed/refractory MM patients. During Phase 1, the maximum tolerated dose of POM was 4 mg, and was used in Phase 2, which also required patients to be refractory to LEN. However, neutropenia ≥ grade 3 was observed in 10/17 (59%) patients, and the dose was lowered to 3 mg. Median PFS was 5·4 months (range, 0·3-29·0 +  months). Overall response rates for patients in Phase 2 were 39% and 31% among subjects receiving POM at 3 mg and 4 mg, respectively, and clinical benefit rates were 51% and 44%, respectively. POM, PLD and DEX is a treatment option for relapsed/refractory MM patients including those who are refractory to LEN.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Doxorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Recurrence , Retreatment , Survival Analysis , Thalidomide/administration & dosage , Thalidomide/analogs & derivatives , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Clin Oncol ; 28(34): 5061-6, 2010 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20956625

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To determine whether increased duration of radiation therapy (RT) and overall treatment (RX) time has a detrimental effect in anal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 87-04 and RTOG 98-11 trials were combined to form three treatment groups: RT/fluorouracil (FU)/mitomycin (n = 472), RT/FU/cisplatin (n = 320), and RT/FU (n = 145). Cox proportional hazards models were used with the following variables: RT duration, RT intensity, RX duration, treatment group, age, sex, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), T stage, N stage, and RT dose. RESULTS: In the univariate analysis, there was a significant association between RX duration and colostomy failure (CF; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.14; P = .02), local failure (HR = 1.52; 95% CI, 1.14 to 2.03; P = .005), locoregional failure (HR = 1.51; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.98; P = .003), and time to failure (HR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.79; P = .007). The significance of RX duration was maintained after adjusting for treatment group. In multivariate modeling there was a trend toward an association between RX duration and CF (HR = 1.57; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.50; P = .06) and a statistically significant association with local failure (HR = 1.96; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.87; P = .0006). Age, sex, KPS, T stage, N stage, and RT dose, but not RT duration, RT intensity, or RX duration, were found to be statistically significant predictors of OS and colostomy-free survival. CONCLUSION: Total treatment time, but not duration of radiation therapy, seems to have a detrimental effect on local failure and colostomy rate in anal cancer. Induction chemotherapy may contribute to local failure by increasing total treatment time.


Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms/mortality , Anus Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Anus Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cisplatin/administration & dosage , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy , Female , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Mitomycin/administration & dosage , Proportional Hazards Models , Radiotherapy Dosage , Time Factors
3.
Eur J Haematol ; 82(6): 433-9, 2009 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19226361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We conducted a single-arm, multicentre phase 2 study to evaluate bortezomib, ascorbic acid and melphalan (BAM) for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Induction consisted of up to eight 28-d cycles of bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) on days 1, 4, 8 and 11, plus oral ascorbic acid 1 g and oral melphalan 0.1 mg/kg on days 1-4, followed by maintenance bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2) every 2 wk until progression. RESULTS: Among 35 patients enrolled (median age 70 yr), responses occurred in 23/31 evaluable patients (74%) including five (16%) complete, three (10%) very good partial, six (19%) partial and nine (29%) minimal responses. Six patients (19%) had stable disease. Thus, disease control was achieved in 29 (94%) patients. Median times to first and best responses were 2 and 3 months (ranges 1-5 and 1-7), respectively. Median time to progression was 19 months and median overall survival has not been reached (range 2-23+ months). Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 17 and 5 patients, respectively; the most common were neutropenia, neuropathy and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSIONS: BAM is an efficacious, well-tolerated and steroid- and immunomodulatory drug (IMiD)-free frontline treatment regimen for MM patients.


Subject(s)
Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage , Boronic Acids/administration & dosage , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Pyrazines/administration & dosage , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/toxicity , Bortezomib , Humans , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/mortality , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Cancer Res ; 14(19): 6289-95, 2008 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18829511

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) have increased rates of bone resorption, osteopenia, osteoporosis, and risk of fractures. This study was undertaken to determine the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid for patients with MGUS and enhanced bone loss. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: In this phase II open-label study, 54 patients with MGUS and osteopenia or osteoporosis were administered zoledronic acid 4 mg i.v. at 0, 6, and 12 months. The primary efficacy end point was bone mineral density, assessed using a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scan in the lumbar (L)-spine done at screening and at 13 months (1 month after the final zoledronic acid infusion). RESULTS: At study end for all patients (N = 54), L-spine T-scores improved by a median of +0.27 (range, -0.38 to +3.91), corresponding to a median increase in bone mineral density of +15.0% (range, -18.0% to +1,140.0%; P < 0.0001). Hip T-scores improved by a median of +0.10 (range, -2.40 to +2.03), corresponding to a median increase of +6.0% (range, -350.0% to +165.0%). During the study, no new fractures, osteonecrosis of the jaw, or significant renal adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid administered i.v. at a dosage of 4 mg every 6 months for three doses total was well-tolerated and substantially improved bone mineral density for patients with MGUS and bone loss. Zoledronic acid may be effective for the prevention of new fractures in this high-risk population.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents/pharmacology , Bone Density , Bone Diseases/drug therapy , Diphosphonates/pharmacology , Imidazoles/pharmacology , Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Lumbar Vertebrae/drug effects , Male , Middle Aged , Osteonecrosis , Radiography , Time Factors , X-Rays , Zoledronic Acid
5.
Clin Breast Cancer ; 8(5): 432-5, 2008 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18952557

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The combination of cisplatin plus gemcitabine is active in metastatic breast cancer. Carboplatin plus gemcitabine, widely used in ovarian and non-small-cell lung cancers, has also been used in breast cancer. This trial examined the efficacy and toxicity of split-dose carboplatin plus gemcitabine in advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable disease, recurrent after adjuvant and < or = 1 previous treatment for systemic disease, received carboplatin area under the curve = 2.0 (Calvert) plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2, both drugs administered days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Of 15 patients accrued, 13 are fully evaluable. RESULTS: There were 2 complete (13.3%) and 6 partial (40%) responses, for an overall response rate by intention to treat of 53.3% (95% CI, 28%-82%). The median time to progression was 4.5 months (95% CI, 2.03-6.97 months), and median overall survival was 28.8 months (95% CI, 9.4-48.2 months). There were 2 patients with grade 3 (13.3%) anemia, 7 patients with grade 3 (46.6%) and 4 patients (26.6%) with grade 4 neutropenia, 4 patients with grade 3 (26.6%) and 3 patients (20%) with grade 4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: The repeating doublet of split-dose carboplatin plus gemcitabine reveals activity comparable to that of cisplatin plus gemcitabine, is well tolerated, and warrants evaluation in patients with recurrent breast cancer.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Gemcitabine
6.
Dermatol Online J ; 12(6): 9, 2006 Oct 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17083889

ABSTRACT

Metastatic basal cell carcinoma (MBCC) of the skin is rare in occurrence and may initially elude proper diagnosis and management. We describe a case of MBCC to cervical lymph nodes, originally evaluated and treated surgically as metastatic thyroid carcinoma. After definitive diagnosis of MBCC was made, chemotherapy and concomitant radiation treatment were initiated; however, despite these measures, the patient then developed MBCC to the lung. Risk factors and current therapeutic modalities for MBCC are also discussed. In addition to the more commonly metastasizing carcinomas, metastases from a cutaneous basal cell carcinoma primary tumor should be considered when evaluating cervical lymph node metastases of an uncertain head and neck primary.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Basal Cell/secondary , Carcinoma, Papillary/diagnosis , Diagnostic Errors , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/secondary , Lymphatic Metastasis , Thyroid Neoplasms/diagnosis , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Biopsy, Fine-Needle , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/drug therapy , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/radiotherapy , Carcinoma, Basal Cell/surgery , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Docetaxel , Head and Neck Neoplasms/drug therapy , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Neck Dissection , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/diagnosis , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Radiotherapy , Seminoma , Skin Neoplasms/surgery , Taxoids/administration & dosage , Testicular Neoplasms , Thyroidectomy , Unnecessary Procedures , Gemcitabine
7.
Br J Haematol ; 135(2): 174-83, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17010047

ABSTRACT

We assessed the safety and efficacy of melphalan, arsenic trioxide (ATO) and ascorbic acid (AA) (MAC) combination therapy for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who failed more than two different prior regimens. Patients received melphalan (0.1 mg/kg p.o.), ATO (0.25 mg/kg i.v.) and AA (1 g i.v) on days 1-4 of week 1, ATO and AA twice weekly during weeks 2-5 and no treatment during week 6 of cycle 1; during cycles 2-6, the schedule remained the same except ATO and AA were given twice weekly in week 1. Objective responses occurred in 31 of 65 (48%) patients, including two complete, 15 partial and 14 minor responses. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 7 and 19 months respectively. Twenty-two patients had elevated serum creatinine levels (SCr) at baseline, and 18 of 22 (82%) showed decreased SCr levels during treatment. Specific grade 3/4 haematological (3%) or cardiac adverse events occurred infrequently. Frequent grade 3/4 non-haematological adverse events included fever/chills (15%), pain (8%) and fatigue (6%). This steroid-free regimen was effective and well tolerated in this heavily pretreated group. These results indicate that the MAC regimen is a new therapeutic option for patients with relapsed or refractory MM.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Arsenic Trioxide , Arsenicals/administration & dosage , Arsenicals/adverse effects , Ascorbic Acid/administration & dosage , Ascorbic Acid/adverse effects , Creatinine/blood , Female , Humans , Male , Melphalan/administration & dosage , Melphalan/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/blood , Oxides/administration & dosage , Oxides/adverse effects , Prospective Studies , Recurrence , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...