Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mod Pathol ; 25(10): 1384-96, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22699518

ABSTRACT

This study assessed whether analysis of MDM2 copy number by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) would help distinguish lipomas from atypical lipomatous tumors, otherwise referred to as well-differentiated liposarcomas, using a commercially available MDM2 FISH kit. 227 lipomatous and 201 non-lipomatous tumors were analyzed to assess its sensitivity and specificity. Of 178 mature lipomatous tumors, 86 were classified histologically as lipoma and 92 as atypical lipomatous tumor. Two of the lipomas harboring MDM2 amplification were reclassified as atypical lipomatous tumors. Overall, 13 atypical lipomatous tumors did not reveal MDM2 or CDK4 amplification, although this was reduced to 12 following analysis of multiple slides. Three of these cases revealed very occasional tumor cells harboring high-level MDM2 amplification, two had a dedifferentiated component, and MDM2 amplification was detected when one tumor recurred. The remaining six cases exhibited reactive/inflammatory features and were reclassified as lipomas. The findings indicate that MDM2 amplification is 93.5% sensitive for diagnosing atypical lipomatous tumor. A total of 2 of the 20 dedifferentiated liposarcomas failed to reveal MDM2 amplification. All atypical lipomatous tumors measured >10 cm, two dedifferentiated liposarcoma presented de novo at <10 cm, and ~50% of lipomas measured >10 cm. Spindle cell lipomas, lipoblastomas, hibernomas and pleomorphic liposarcomas did not reveal MDM2 amplification. Of 201 non-lipomatous tumors, eight revealed MDM2 amplification or multiple faint alphoid 12 signals and were reclassified as dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Multiple faint alphoid 12 signals were observed in nine tumors from seven patients, an observation not previously reported on paraffin sections: these included four atypical lipomatous tumors, and three dedifferentiated liposarcomas, one previously diagnosed as a myxofibrosarcoma, all of which also revealed amplification of CDK4, although two lacked MDM2 amplification. MDM2 FISH test is a useful adjunct to histology for distinguishing lipoma from atypical lipomatous tumor. The limitations of molecular genetic tests must be known before introducing them into a clinical service.


Subject(s)
DNA, Satellite/genetics , Gene Amplification , Gene Dosage , Lipoma/genetics , Liposarcoma/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2/genetics , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/genetics , Adult , Aged , Centromere/genetics , Female , Genetic Markers/genetics , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence/methods , Lipoma/diagnosis , Lipoma/metabolism , Liposarcoma/diagnosis , Liposarcoma/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mdm2/metabolism , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/metabolism
2.
Skeletal Radiol ; 39(1): 63-8, 2010 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19830424

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To report on the biochemistry and clinical and genetic findings of two siblings, the younger sister presenting with recurrent bone pain of the radius and ulna, and medullary sclerosis, and the older brother with soft tissue calcific deposits (tumoral calcinosis) but who later developed bone pain. Both were found to be hyperphosphaturic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The index family comprised four individuals (father, mother, brother, sister). The affected siblings were the offspring of a non-consanguineous Indian family of Tamil origin. Bidirectional sequencing was performed on the DNA from the index family and on 160 alleles from a population of 80 unrelated unaffected control individuals of Tamil extraction and 72 alleles from individuals of non-Tamil origin. RESULTS: Two symptomatic siblings were found to harbour previously unreported compound heterozygous missense UDP-N-acetyl-D-galactosamine: polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 3 (GalNAc-transferase; GALNT3) mutations in exon 4 c.842A>G and exon 5 c.1097T>G. This sequence variation was not detected in the control DNA. This is the first report of siblings exhibiting stigmata of familial tumoral calcinosis and hyperostosis-hyperphosphataemia syndrome with documented evidence of autosomal recessive missense GALNT3 mutations. CONCLUSION: The findings from this family add further evidence to the literature that familial tumoral calcinosis and hyperostosis-hyperphosphataemia syndrome are manifestations of the same disease and highlight the importance of appropriate metabolic and genetic investigations.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/genetics , Calcinosis/genetics , Hyperphosphatemia/genetics , N-Acetylgalactosaminyltransferases/genetics , Adolescent , Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Humans , Hyperphosphatemia/diagnostic imaging , Male , Mutation, Missense , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Radiography , Polypeptide N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...