Combination of N,N',N"-triethylenethiophosphoramide and cyclophosphamide in vitro and in vivo.

In vitro and in vivo studies with the drug combination thioTEPA and cyclophosphamide (CPA) were carried out using the MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cell line and the EMT6 mouse mammary carcinoma cell line. In vitro, survival curves were essentially linear. The EMT6 cell line was less sensitive to thioTEPA than the MCF-7 cell line, with concentrations which reduce cell survival to 10% of 440 and 140 microM, respectively. The response of both cell lines to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide was similar. Simultaneous and immediate sequential treatments with these drugs produced supraadditive cell killing of both cell lines, although the magnitude of the supraadditivity was greater in the MCF-7 cell line than in the EMT6 cell line. Both of these drugs appeared to be as effective as thiol-depleting agents as is diethyl maleate. By DNA alkaline elution, there was a pattern of increasing DNA cross-linking similar to the increasing levels of cytotoxicity of this drug combination with increasing thioTEPA concentrations. In the EMT6 tumor in vivo, the maximally tolerated combination therapy (5 mg/kg x 6 thioTEPA and 100 mg/kg x 3 CPA) produced about 25 days of tumor growth delay which was not significantly different than expected for additivity of the individual drugs. The survival of EMT6 tumor cells after treatment of the animals with various single doses of thioTEPA and CPA was assayed. Tumor cell killing by thioTEPA produced a very steep, linear survival curve through 5 logs. The tumor cell survival curve for CPA out to 500 mg/kg gave linear tumor cell kill through almost 4 logs. In all cases, the combination treatment tumor cell survivals fell well within the envelope of additivity. Both of these drugs are somewhat less toxic toward bone marrow cells by the granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit in vitro assay method than to tumor cells. The combination treatments were subadditive or additive in bone marrow granulocyte-macrophage colony-forming unit killing. When bone marrow is the dose-limiting tissue, there is a therapeutic advantage to the use of this drug combination.

Collateral methotrexate resistance in cultured human head and neck carcinoma cells selected for resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II).

A human head and neck squamous cell carcinoma line (SCC25) derived from a patient with no prior history of radiotherapy or chemotherapy was made resistant to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (CDDP) by continuous escalation of weekly 30-min pulses of the CDDP from 0 to 0.2 mM over 20 months and then cloned and pulsed weekly with 0.2 mM CDDP for another 20 months. This afforded a resistant subline, SCC25/CP[1], with an IC50 for CDDP 12-fold higher than that of the parental cells. The SCC25/CP[1] cells unexpectedly proved to be cross-resistant to methotrexate (MTX) (24-fold for 30-min treatment and 8-fold for continuous treatment). Resistance was associated with a modest (about 2-fold) increase in the dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) content according to radioligand-binding assay, and in the rate of cell division. In addition there was a 4-fold decrease in the fraction of long-chain MTX polyglutamates MTX(G4-6) in the cell after 24 h exposure to either 0.2 or 2.0 microM MTX. When the SCC25/CP[1] cells were kept out of CDDP for 8-9 months and 12 months to give the sublines SCC25/CP[2] and SCC25/CP[3], respectively, MTX sensitivity to continuous exposure returned to normal. The SCC25/CP[3] cells still exhibited a slightly elevated DHFR level, but their generation time became shorter than that of the parental SCC25 line. In addition the SCC25/CP[3] cells had an initial uptake velocity (V0) for MTX that was 9-fold greater than the V0 of the SCC25 or SCC25/CP[1] cells, while its ability to form MTX(G4-6) was comparable to that of the SCC25 cells. When SCC25/CP[2] cells were rechallenged with weekly 0.2 mM CDDP pulses for 4-6 months, a MTX-resistant line, SCC25/CP[4], was produced. The SCC25/CP[4] cells retained a slightly elevated DHFR content and a high proliferation rate, but the V0 for MTX influx was intermediate between SCC25 and SCC25/CP[3] cells. The ability to form the longer-chain polyglutamates MTX(G4-6) was again impaired. Thus, MTX cross-resistance can develop in cultured head and neck carcinoma cells when CDDP is used as the selecting agent for primary resistance. MTX resistance is multifactorial, as it is when MTX itself is used as the selecting agent, and appears to involve various combinations of altered growth rate, DHFR content, MTX uptake, and ability to form noneffluxing long-chain MTX polyglutamate species. These results are potentially of clinical relevance, since CDDP and MTX are often used in combination with other drugs or with radiation to treat patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Alkylating agents: in vitro studies of cross-resistance patterns in human cell lines.

The alkylating agents represent one of the most important classes of antitumor agents and play a major role in combination with other agents in the curative chemotherapy of selected human cancers. By repeatedly exposing cells to escalating doses of an alkylating agent, we have developed four human tumor cell lines which are relatively stably resistant to the drug with which the culture was treated. The response of these cell lines to a variety of alkylating agents was compared to the response of the parent cell lines to the same drug. The Raji/HN2 line was 7-fold resistant to nitrogen mustard and about 3-fold resistant to 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphamide, but it was not resistant to N,N'-bis(2-chloroethyl)-N-nitrosourea (BCNU), melphalan (MEL), busulfan, trimethyleneiminethiophosphoramide, 4-hydroperoxyifosfamide, or cisplatin [cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II)] (CDDP). The Raji/BCNU line was 5.3-fold resistant to BCNU and 4-fold resistant to both MEL and CDDP. The Raji/CP line was 7-fold resistant to CDDP and 3-fold resistant to both nitrogen mustard and BCNU, but it was not resistant to busulfan, trimethyleneiminethiophosphoramide, or 4-hydroperoxyifosfamide. The SCC-25/CP line, which was 12-fold resistant to CDDP, was 5-fold resistant to MEL and 3-fold resistant to 4-hydroxyperoxycyclophosphamide. The SCC-25/CP line was almost 24-fold resistant to methotrexate after 30-min treatment and about 7-fold resistant to methotrexate after continuous treatment. None of the other cell lines was resistant to methotrexate. The survival of SCC-25 and SCC-25/CP cells exposed to several antineoplastic agents was examined over several logs of survival. The SCC-25/CP cells are highly resistant to CDDP; the ratio of the slopes of the survival curves (SCC-25/CP to SCC-25) of the two lines was 43. At survivals of 1%, resistance to MEL and BCNU became evident in the SCC-25/CP line. At survivals of 0.1%, resistance to mitomycin C and, to a lesser degree, to Adriamycin and vincristine was evident. It is more difficult to produce resistance to alkylating agents, even with extended selection pressure, than to other antineoplastic drugs such as antimetabolites and natural products. We found no evidence of pleiotropic resistance in any alkylating agent-resistant cell line. Our results suggest that a judicious choice of alkylating agents given in sequential or concurrent combination may be a rational treatment strategy with potential applications in the clinic.