ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: A decision model was developed in a pilot study comparing a regimen using a skin care product line containing active ingredients and nutrients with a commercially available alternative skin care regimen in an elderly convalescent care hospital-based center. METHODS: Using a decision-tree model, skin treatment with a nutrient-based skin care (NBSC) formulation was compared with products without nutrients. The number of skin-tear-free days was the primary outcome measure. A cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated for each skin treatment as the average cost for reaching a particular outcome. Incidence of skin tear data was collected from residents in a convalescent center from 2004 to 2005. An independent t test was used to compare differences in the number of skin tears between periods when NBSC and other formulations were used. All costs in the decision model were adjusted to 2007 dollars. Sensitivity analysis was used to test uncertain data. RESULTS: The NBSC provided more skin-tear-free days and was less costly than the use of non-NBSC products. The expected skin-tear-free days for a patient in the model treated with NBSC were 179.7 days compared with 154.6 days for non-NBSC products, yielding an incremental effect of 25.1 days. The expected cost of preventing skin tears and treatment via skin treatment per patient in the NBSC group was $281.00 versus $324.10 for periods when other products were used. CONCLUSION: The NBSC had a lower projected cost for prevention of skin tears and more skin-tear-free days when compared with non-NBSC products.
Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements/economics , Hospitals, Convalescent , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/prevention & control , Skin Care/economics , Skin/injuries , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Decision Trees , Humans , Incidence , Phospholipids/economics , Phospholipids/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Surface-Active Agents/economics , Surface-Active Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Air-fluidized support surface therapy has many drawbacks, such as dehydration, in an already difficult recovery for those wound patients who have undergone flap and graft surgery. In addition, patient care and handling are also problematic. Patients complain of discomfort, and the instability of the surface interferes with patient stability in side lying and semi-Fowler's positions. Alternative support surfaces can be considered for postflap or postgraft patients. Such technologies as alternating pressure, low-air-loss, and therapeutic nonpowered, advanced, and lateral rotation surfaces are widely used for pressure management in high-risk patients and those with existing pressure ulcers. These surfaces must be used within a total pressure ulcer management program that includes frequent turning and repositioning, skin and ulcer care according to evidence-based protocols, patient and caregiver instruction, nutrition, and offloading and positioning. The proposed recommendations require more research on the relative effectiveness of less expensive and more user-friendly support surfaces such as low-air-loss and nonpowered advanced support surfaces and is necessary in order to conclusively recommend one type of surface over another. However, at this time the available clinical studies and opinions remain positive.
ABSTRACT
One of the leading questions on clinicians' minds is, What are the implications of the new ruling of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in acute care, and how will it affect the wound care clinician? The CMS recently unveiled its plans for reimbursement and nonpayment for facility-acquired pressure ulcers, among other issues, in acute care. Change is coming, and this time prevention and intervention underlie the CMS payment reform ruling, which includes payment incentive for prevention and quality patient care. Intensive and comprehensive patient screenings at the outset of admission, as well as diligent prevention during patient stay, are the mainstays of this initiative. Anyone who works in a hospital will play a major role.
Subject(s)
Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnosis , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Brachial Artery , Severity of Illness Index , Toes/blood supply , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/classification , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Brachial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Mathematics , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , UltrasonographySubject(s)
Ankle/blood supply , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Brachial Artery/diagnostic imaging , Nursing Assessment/methods , Severity of Illness Index , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/epidemiology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/nursing , Documentation , Humans , Mathematics , Nurse's Role , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Reference Values , Ultrasonography, Doppler/methods , Ultrasonography, Doppler/nursing , United States/epidemiologySubject(s)
Pressure Ulcer , Skin Care/methods , Soft Tissue Injuries , Bandages , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Nursing Assessment , Posture , Pressure , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Pressure Ulcer/etiology , Pressure Ulcer/therapy , Risk Factors , Skin Care/nursing , Soft Tissue Injuries/diagnosis , Soft Tissue Injuries/etiology , Soft Tissue Injuries/therapy , Wound HealingSubject(s)
Lacerations/therapy , Skin Care/methods , Skin/injuries , Acute Disease , Age Distribution , Aged , Aging , Bandages, Hydrocolloid , Humans , Lacerations/classification , Lacerations/epidemiology , Lacerations/etiology , Patient Care Planning , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Skin/anatomy & histology , Skin Care/nursing , Tissue Adhesives/adverse effectsSubject(s)
Nursing Assessment/methods , Physical Examination/methods , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Arterial Occlusive Diseases/diagnosis , Dermatitis/diagnosis , Diabetic Foot/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Observation , Physical Examination/nursing , Pressure Ulcer/diagnosis , Skin/injuries , Tinea Pedis/diagnosis , Varicose Ulcer/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/nursingSubject(s)
Bandages , Nursing Assessment/organization & administration , Skin Care/instrumentation , Wounds and Injuries/nursing , Bandages/classification , Bandages/supply & distribution , Benchmarking , Choice Behavior , Debridement , Humans , Patient Selection , Skin Care/methods , Skin Care/nursingSubject(s)
Odorants , Skin Care/methods , Wound Infection/prevention & control , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Attitude to Health , Bandages , Body Image , Causality , Charcoal , Deodorants , Infection Control/methods , Magnesium Silicates , Shame , Skin Care/nursing , Social Isolation , Suction , Wound Infection/etiology , Wound Infection/psychologySubject(s)
Infection Control/methods , Skin Care/methods , Wound Infection/prevention & control , Acrylic Resins/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/therapeutic use , Bandages , Benchmarking , Biguanides/therapeutic use , Biofilms , Body Burden , Chronic Disease , Colony Count, Microbial , Disinfectants/therapeutic use , Humans , Iodine Compounds/therapeutic use , Iodophors , Patient Selection , Silver Compounds/therapeutic use , Wound Infection/microbiologyABSTRACT
Ichthyoses-- rare, genetic, incurable dermatologic diseases characterized by dry, thickened, scaling skin-- affect more than 1 million Americans and can cause devastating disfigurement with numerous physical, social, and emotional consequences. Topical treatments typically focus on symptom management. A 44-year-old man presented with severe X-linked type ichthyosis. When his condition did not improve with the use of a variety of topical and systemic treatments, a once-a-day, over-the-counter skin care regimen consisting of a surfactant-free cleanser followed by the application of moisturizer containing amino acids, vitamins, antioxidants, and methylsulfonylmethane was prescribed. After 4 weeks of using this management regimen on a test area on his left arm, the skin was clear and discomfort and itching had subsided. Subsequent application of the skin care products on other affected areas also did not cause any adverse reactions and his skin continued to improve. Symptom resolution and patient satisfaction indicate the product line may be a viable consideration for use in patients with similarly compromised skin.