Vasectomía sin bisturí: resultados de una cohorte de 309 pacientes / No-scalpel vasectomy

Introducción: La vasectomía es una técnica segura y efectiva para el control de la fertilidad masculina. A pesar de esto, en el mundo se realizan el doble de esterilizaciones femeninas respecto a vasectomías, lo cual es más acentuado en países en vías de desarrollo. Objetivos: El objetivo de este trabajo es presentar nuestra experiencia y resultados en pacientes sometidos a una vasectomía sin bisturí. Materiales y Métodos: Se incluyó un total de 309 pacientes sometidos a una vasectomía sin bisturí entre junio de 2009 y mayo de 2010. En cada caso se evaluó la edad, tiempo operatorio, espermiograma a los 3 y 6 meses (en caso de ser necesario) y la morbilidad perioperatoria. Resultados: 281 pacientes (91 por ciento) se controlaron con al menos un espermiograma. En 189 pacientes (67 por ciento) se evidenció azoospermia en el espermiograma a los 3 meses. En 81 pacientes (29 por ciento) se evidenció un recuento con < 100.000 espermatozoides 100 por ciento inmóviles. En 9 pacientes (3,2 por ciento) se necesitó un segundo espermiograma para obtener menos de 100.000 espermatozoides 100 por ciento inmóviles. Seis pacientes (2 por ciento) consultaron por complicaciones menores: orquialgia, epididimitos o hematoma del sitio operatorio. A 2 años de seguimiento, no se registraron embarazos. Conclusiones: La vasectomía sin bisturí es un método seguro y reproducible de anticoncepción masculina, presentando tasas de efectividad superiores al resto de los métodos anticonceptivos. Un espermiograma de control debe ser realizado a los 3 meses de realizado el procedimiento. La tasa de falla temprana se estima en 0,3 por ciento de los pacientes.

Introduction: Vasectomy is a safe and effective technique of male fertility control. Despite this, in the world are carried out more than double female sterilization in comparison with vasectomies, that is more pronounced in less developed countries. Aims: To present our experience and results in patients undergoing a no-scalpel vasectomy. Methods and Material: A total of 309 patients undergoing a no-scalpel vasectomy between June 2009 and May 2010 were included. For each case was record age, operative time, sperm count at 3 months post vasectomy and peri-operative morbidity. Results: 309 vasectomies were performed, 281 patients (91%) were controlled with at least one sperm count. Azoospermia was obtained in the first sperm count at 3 months in 189 patients (67%). In 81 patients (29%) were observed ≤ 100,000 sperm 100% immobile. 9 patients (3.2%) needed a second semen analysis and 2 patients a third one for less than 100,000 sperm that were 100% immobile. 6 patients (2%) consulted by minor complications such as postoperative pain, epididymitis or hematoma with spontaneous resolution. Conclusions: Vasectomy is a safe and reproducible method of male contraception, presenting an effectiveness rates higher than others contraceptive methods. There are no absolute contraindications for performing the procedure. A sperm count should be done at 3 months of the procedure. The early failure rate in our study is 0.3%.

Efectividad y satisfacción del tratamiento con dosis diaria de Tadalafilo 5 mg para la disfunción eréctil / Effectiveness and satisfaction of the treatment with daily dose of Tadalafil 5 mg for erectile dysfunction

La base del tratamiento de la disfunción eréctil (DE) son los inhibidores de la fosfodiesterasa 5, disponibles mayoritariamente para dosificación a demanda. En 2008 la FDA aprobó el Tadalafilo 5 mg de uso diario. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la efectividad del Tadalafilo 5 mg de uso diario para el tratamiento de la DE y la satisfacción de los pacientes frente a su uso. PACIENTES Y METODOS: Se reclutaron pacientes con DE entre Junio de 2011 y Mayo de 2012. Se registraron datos sociodemográficos, clínicos y andrológicos. La DE se clasificó según el puntaje del cuestionario IIEF. Todos los pacientes iniciaron tratamiento diario con Tadalafilo 5 mg y fueron reevaluados luego de un mes. La satisfacción y calidad de vida se evaluó con cuestionarios validados (EDITS, SEAR y GAQ). Para el análisis estadístico se consideró significativo un P<0.05.RESULTADOS: Se reclutaron 49 pacientes con edad promedio de 59,9 +/- 8,8 años. Un 14,3 por ciento presentaba DE severa, 36,7 por ciento moderada, 36,7por ciento leve-moderada y 12,2 por ciento leve. Al mes de tratamiento, el puntaje IIEF aumentó significativamente (P<0.0005), encontrándose un 18,4 por ciento sin DE, 53,1 por ciento con DE leve, 28,6 por ciento con DE leve-moderada y ninguno con DE moderada o grave. El 87,7 por ciento de los pacientes refirió mejores erecciones y el 81,6 por ciento una mejor capacidad para mantener la relación sexual. La satisfacción global con el tratamiento fue de 64,1 por ciento. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento diario con Tadalafilo 5 mg es efectivo para el manejo de la DE y se asocia a niveles adecuados de satisfacción y confianza al cabo de un mes de tratamiento.

The base of the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) are the phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, mostly available for “on demand” dosing. In 2008, the FDA approved Tadalafil 5mg for daily use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of Tadalafil 5 mg daily dose for the treatment of ED and the patient’s satisfaction with its use. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ED were enrolled between June 2011 and May 2012. Sociodemographic, clinical and andrologic data was recorded. The severity of ED was classified according to the score of the IIEF questionnaire. All patients started daily treatment with Tadalafil 5 mg and were reevaluated after one month. Satisfaction and quality of life was assessed using validated questionnaires (EDITS, SEAR and GAQ). A P<0.05 was considered significant in all statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 49 patients were enrolled, with mean age of 59.9 +/- 8.8 years. A 14.3 ´percent suffered severe ED, 36.7 percent moderate, 36.7 percent mild-moderate and 12.2 percent mild. After one month, the IIEF score significantly increased (P<0.0005), finding a 18.4 percent of patients without ED, 53.1 percent with mild ED, 28.6 percent with mild-moderate ED and no cases with moderate or severe ED. 87.7 percent of patients reported better erections and 81.6 percent stated a better capacity to maintain erections during. The global satisfaction rate with the treatment was of 64.1 percent. CONCLUSION: The treatment with daily dose of Tadalafil 5 mg is effective for the management of ED and is associated with adequate levels of satisfaction and confidence after one month of use.

Activated ClpP kills persisters and eradicates a chronic biofilm infection.

Chronic infections are difficult to treat with antibiotics but are caused primarily by drug-sensitive pathogens. Dormant persister cells that are tolerant to killing by antibiotics are responsible for this apparent paradox. Persisters are phenotypic variants of normal cells and pathways leading to dormancy are redundant, making it challenging to develop anti-persister compounds. Biofilms shield persisters from the immune system, suggesting that an antibiotic for treating a chronic infection should be able to eradicate the infection on its own. We reasoned that a compound capable of corrupting a target in dormant cells will kill persisters. The acyldepsipeptide antibiotic (ADEP4) has been shown to activate the ClpP protease, resulting in death of growing cells. Here we show that ADEP4-activated ClpP becomes a fairly nonspecific protease and kills persisters by degrading over 400 proteins, forcing cells to self-digest. Null mutants of clpP arise with high probability, but combining ADEP4 with rifampicin produced complete eradication of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms in vitro and in a mouse model of a chronic infection. Our findings indicate a general principle for killing dormant cells-activation and corruption of a target, rather than conventional inhibition. Eradication of a biofilm in an animal model by activating a protease suggests a realistic path towards developing therapies to treat chronic infections.

Tratamiento endoscópico de cálculos ureterales: experiencia en una serie de 102 casos / Endoscopic treatment of ureteral stones: experience in a series of 102 cases

INTRODUCCIÓN: La ureterolitectomía endoscópica (URS) es una técnica validada para el manejo de cálculos ureterales, ya que tiene alto poder resolutivo y es poco invasiva. El desarrollo de instrumentos flexibles ha facilitado el manejo endoscópico de los cálculos en uréter medio y proximal. El objetivo de este trabajo es describir la experiencia de nuestro centro en URS. Material y metodos: Análisis retrospectivo de las URS realizadas en nuestro centro entre Diciembre 2009 y Mayo 2012. Se consignaron las características del cálculo, el método de fragmentación, la efectividad del procedimiento y las complicaciones. Se utilizaron los ureteroscopios semirrígido Wolf (6,0-9,5 Fr) y flexible Karl Storz Flex X2. Resultados: Se revisaron 102 ureteroscopías, 85 con ureteroscopio semirrígido y 17 con flexible. Los cálculos tuvieron un promedio de 5,7 mm y 642 UH. El 89,4 por ciento de los cálculos resueltos mediante URS semirrígida se localizaban en uréter distal y 52,9 por ciento de los resueltos con URS flexible en uréter proximal. Se realizó litotripsia con láser Holmium en un 25,9 por ciento y 70,6 por ciento de los casos con URS semirrígida y flexible, respectivamente. Se utilizó litotripsia pneumática en un 4,7 por ciento de los casos de URS semirrígida. En URS semirrígida y flexible, la tasa de stone-free + fragmentos < 2 mm fue de 89,4 por ciento y 88,2 por ciento, respectivamente. Sólo hubo una complicación en nuestra serie (infección urinaria febril en 1 caso con URS flexible). La mediana de hospitalización fue de 1 día (rango 1-5 días). Conclusion: Nuestros resultados reafirman a la URS como una técnica eficaz, segura y poco invasiva para el tratamiento de los cálculos ureterales.

INTRODUCTION: The endoscopic ureterolithotomy (URS) is a validated technique for the management of ureteral calculi, which is highly resolutive and minimally invasive. The development of flexible instruments has facilitated the endoscopic management of stones in the mid and proximal segments of the ureter. The aim of this paper is to describe the experience of our center in endoscopic ureterolithotomy. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of URS performed at our center between December 2009 and May 2012. We recorded the characteristics of the stones, the fragmentation method, the effectiveness of the procedure and complications. The Wolf semi-rigid (6.0 to 9.5 Fr) and the flexible Karl Storz Flex X2 ureteroscopes were used. RESULTS: We reviewed 102 URS, 85 with semi-rigid and 17 with flexible ureteroscope. The calculi were 5.7 mm and 642 HU in average. 89.4 percent of the stones treated with a semi-rigid URS were localized in the distal ureter and 52.9 percent of the calculi treated with a flexible URS were in the proximal ureter. Holmium laser lithotripsy was performed in 25.9 percent and 70.6 percent of the cases of semi-rigid and flexible URS, respectively. Pneumatic lithotripsy was used in 4.7 percent of the semi-rigid URS. In semi-rigid and flexible URS, the rate of stone-free + fragments < 2 mm was 89.4 percent and 88.2 percent, respectively. There was only one complication in our series (febrile urinary tract infection in 1 case of flexible URS). The median length of stay was 1 day (range 1-5 days). CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that URS is an effective, safe and minimally invasive treatment for ureteral calculi.

[Trends among medical students towards general practice or specialization]. / Tendencia en el estudiante de medicina a ejercer como médico general o especialista.

BACKGROUND: A 60/40 ratio has been estimated as a country's ideal proportion between general practitioners and specialists. In Chile this proportion was 36/ 64 in 2004, exactly the opposite of the ideal. Trends towards specialization or general practice among medical students have not been thoughtfully studied. AIM: To assess trends among medical students towards becoming general practitioners or specialists, exploring associated factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive survey of 822 first to seventh year medical students at the University of Chile, School of Medicine. Desired activity to pursue (general practice or specialization) after graduation and general orientations within clinical practice were explored. RESULTS: Fifty three percent of students desired to enter a specialization program. Only 20% would work as a general practitioner (27% were still indecisive). Furthermore, a trend in early years of medical training towards an integral medicine is gradually reversed within later years. Seventh year students give significantly more importance to specialization than to integral medicine (p <0.01). Ten percent of this opinion change is related to the emphasis given to specialized medicine in the teaching environment. CONCLUSIONS: Most students prefer to enter a specialization program immediately after finishing medical school. Moreover, there is a social trend, at least within the teacher-attending environment, promoting not only the desire to specialize, but a pro-specialist culture.

Tendencia en el estudiante de medicina a ejercer como médico general o especialista / Trends among medical students towards general practice or specialization

Background: A 60/40 ratio has been estimated as a country's ideal proportion between general practitioners and specialists. In Chile this proportion was 36/ 64 in 2004, exactly the opposite of the ideal. Trends towards specialization or general practice among medical students have not been thoughtfully studied. Aim: To assess trends among medical students towards becoming general practitioners or specialists, exploring associated factors. Material and methods: Descriptive survey of 822 first to seventh year medical students at the University of Chile, School of Medicine. Desired activity to pursue (general practice or specialization) after graduation and general orientations within clinical practice were explored. Results: Fifty three percent of students desired to enter a specialization program. Only 20 percent would work as a general practitioner (27 percent were still indecisive). Furthermore, a trend in early years of medical training towards an integral medicine is gradually reversed within later years. Seventh year students give significantly more importance to specialization than to integral medicine (p <0.01). Ten percent of this opinion change is related to the emphasis given to specialized medicine in the teaching environment. Conclusions: Most students prefer to enter a specialization program immediately after finishing medical school. Moreover, there is a social trend, at least within the teacher-attending environment, promoting not only the desire to specialize, but a pro-specialist culture.

Training tomorrow's clinicians today--managed care essentials: a process for curriculum development.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a managed care curriculum for primary care residents. DESIGN: This article outlines a 4-stage curriculum development process focusing on concepts of managed care organization and finance. The stages consist of: (1) identifying the curriculum development work group and framing the scope of the curriculum, (2) identifying stakeholder buy-in and expectations, (3) choosing curricular topics and delivery mechanisms, and (4) outlining the evaluation process. Key elements of building a curriculum development team, content objectives of the curriculum, the rationale for using problem-based learning, and finally, lessons learned from the partnership among the stakeholders are reviewed. RESULTS: The curriculum was delivered to an entering group of postgraduate-year 1 primary care residents. Attitudes among residents toward managed care remained relatively negative and stable over the yearlong curriculum, especially over issues relating to finance, quality of care, control and autonomy of practitioners, time spent with patients, and managed care's impact on the doctor-patient relationship. Residents' baseline knowledge of core concepts about managed care organization and finance improved during the year that the curriculum was delivered. Satisfaction with a problem-based learning approach was high. CONCLUSION: Problem-based learning, using real-life clinical examples, is a successful approach to resident instruction about managed care.

Improving our aim.

Bioethicists appearing in the media have been accused of "shooting from the hip" (Rachels, 1991). The criticism is sometimes justified. We identify some reasons our interactions with the press can have bad results and suggest remedies. In particular we describe a target (fostering better public dialogue), obstacles to hitting the target (such as intrinsic and accidental defects in our knowledge) and suggest some practical ways to surmont those obstacles (including seeking out ways to write or speak at length, rather than in sound bites). We make use of our own research into the way journalists quote bioethicists. We end by suggesting that the profession as a whole look into this question more fully.

The clinical introduction of genetic testing for Alzheimer disease. An ethical perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Primary caregivers should be aware of recent progress in the genetics of Alzheimer disease (AD) and of the clinical and ethical considerations raised regarding the introduction of genetic testing for purposes of disease prediction and susceptibility (risk) analysis in asymptomatic individuals and diagnosis in patients who present clinically with dementia. This statement addresses arguments for and against clinical genetic testing. PARTICIPANTS: The 20 participants were selected by the investigators (S.G.P., T.H.M., A.B.Z., and P.J.W.) to achieve balance in the areas of genetics, counseling, ethics, and public policy, and to include leadership from related consensus projects. The consensus group met twice in closed meetings and carried on extensive correspondence over 2 years (1995-1997). The project was supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health. EVIDENCE: All 4 involved chromosomes were discussed in group meetings against a background of information from several focus group sessions with AD-affected families. The focus groups comprised volunteers identified by the Cleveland Area Chapter of the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association and represented a variety of ethnic populations. CONSENSUS PROCESS: The first draft was written in April 1996 by the principal investigator (S.G.P.) after the consensus group had met twice. The draft was mailed to all consensus group members 3 times over 6 months for extensive response and redrafting by the principal investigator until all members were satisfied. CONCLUSIONS: Except for autosomal dominant early-onset families, genetic testing in asymptomatic individuals is unwarranted. Use of APOE genetic testing as a diagnostic adjunct in patients already presenting with dementia may prove useful but it remains under investigation. The premature introduction of genetic testing and possible adverse consequences are to be avoided.

Just caring: health reform and health care rationing.

Health reform must include health care rationing, both for reasons of fairness and efficiency. Few politicians are willing to accept this claim, including the Clinton Administration. Brown and others have argued that enormous waste and inefficiency must be wrung out of our health care system before morally problematic cost constraining options, such as rationing, can be justifiably adopted. However, I argue that most of the policies and practices that would diminish waste and inefficiency include implicit (and therefore morally problematic) rationing. Critics of rationing see as its most morally and psychologically troubling feature that an identified individual is denied potentially beneficial care. That psychic anguish may not be eliminable, and perhaps ought not be eliminated. But if rationing protocols are fairly adopted through a process of free and informed rational democratic deliberation to which all have access, the moral objections are largely overcome. Such a process is possible only if implicit rationing is recognized and rejected.

Just caring: Oregon, health care rationing, and informed democratic deliberation.

This essay argues that our national efforts at health reform ought to be informed by eleven key lessons from Oregon. Specifically, we must learn that the need for health care rationing is inescapable, that any rationing process must be public and visible, and that fair rationing protocols must be self-imposed through a process of rational democratic deliberation. Part I of this essay notes that rationing is a ubiquitous feature of our health care system at present, but it is mostly hidden rationing, which is presumptively unjust. Part II argues that the need for health care rationing is inescapable. Although Oregon is flawed as a model of health rationing, it gives us worthy moral lessons for health reform at the national level, which I analyze and defend in Part III. The most significant of these lessons is the importance of rational democratic deliberation in articulating fair rationing protocols for a community. In Part IV I sketch the philosophic justification for this approach and respond to some important criticisms from Daniels.

Teaching the process of obtaining informed consent to medical students.

This paper describes a unit on the informed consent process taught to 119 first-year students at the Michigan State University College of Osteopathic Medicine in 1988-89. The unit consisted of a pretest and a posttest, a lecture, readings, small-group discussions, a model videotaped interview, and the students' videotaped interviews with one of two simulated patients. In the interviews, the students were most successful in establishing rapport and engaging the patients in discussions of treatment alternatives, and were less successful in perceiving the patients as unique individuals and in dealing with situations that involved conflict or confrontation. The authors suggest that curricula can be enhanced by focusing on the importance of patients' participation in the informed consent process.

Just health care (II): Is equality too much?

In a previous essay I criticized Engelhardt's libertarian conception of justice, which grounds the view that society's obligation to assure access to adequate health care for all is a matter of beneficence. Beneficence fails to capture the moral stringency associated with many claims for access to health care. In the present paper I argue that these claims are really matters of justice proper, where justice is conceived along moderate egalitarian lines, such as those suggested by Rawls and Daniels, rather than strong egalitarian lines. Further, given the empirical complexity associated with the distribution of contemporary health care, I argue that what we really need to address the relevant policy issues adequately is a theory of health care justice, as opposed to an all-purpose conception of justice. Daniels has made an important start toward that goal, though there are some large policy areas which I discuss that his account of health care justice does not really speak to. Finally, practical matters of health care justice really need to be addressed in a 'non-ideal' mode, a framework in which philosophers have done little.