Can a flowchart improve the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation?

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of basic life support in the 1950s, on-going efforts have been made to improve the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Even though bystander-CPR can increase the chance of survival almost fourfold, the rates of bystander initiated CPR have remained low and rarely exceed 20%. Lack of confidence and fear of committing mistakes are reasons why helpers refrain from initiating CPR. The authors tested the hypothesis that quality and confidence of bystander-CPR can be increased by supplying lay helpers with a basic life support flowchart when commencing CPR, in a simulated resuscitation model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After giving written informed consent, 83 medically untrained laypersons were randomised to perform basic life support for 300s with or without a supportive flowchart. The primary outcome parameter was hands-off time (HOT). Furthermore, the participants' confidence in their actions on a 10-point Likert-like scale and time-to-chest compressions were assessed. RESULTS: Overall HOT was 147±30 s (flowchart) vs. 169±55 s (non-flowchart), p=0.024. Time to chest compressions was significantly longer in the flowchart group (60±24 s vs. 23±18 s, p<0.0001). Participants in the flowchart group were significantly more confident when performing BLS than the non-flowchart counterparts (7±2 vs. 5±2, p=0.0009). CONCLUSIONS: A chart provided at the beginning of resuscitation attempts improves quality of CPR significantly by decreasing HOT and increasing the participants' confidence when performing CPR. As reducing HOT is associated with improved outcome and positively impacting the helpers' confidence is one of the main obstacles to initiate CPR for lay helpers, charts could be utilised as simple measure to improve outcome in cardiopulmonary arrest.

Reduced hands-off-time and time to first shock in CPR according to the ERC Guidelines 2005.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chest compressions and early defibrillation are crucial in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The Guidelines 2005 brought major changes to the basic life support and automated external defibrillator (BLS-AED) algorithm. We compared the European Resuscitation Council's Guidelines 2000 (group '00) and 2005 (group '05) on hands-off-time (HOT) and time to first shock (TTFS) in an experimental model. METHODS: In a randomised, cross-over design, volunteers were assessed in performing BLS-AED over a period of 5min on a manikin in a simulated ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest situation. Ten minutes of standardised teaching and 10min of training including corrective feedback were allocated for each of the guidelines before evaluation. HOT was chosen as the primary and TTFS as the secondary outcome parameter. RESULTS: Forty participants were enrolled; one participant dropped out after group allocation. During the 5-min evaluation period of adult BLS-AED, HOT was significantly (p<0.001) longer in group '00 [273+/-3s (mean+/-standard error)] than in group '05 (188+/-3s). The TTFS was significantly (p<0.001) longer in group '00 (91+/-3s) than in group '05 (71+/-3s). CONCLUSION: In this manikin setting, HOT and TTFS improved with BLS-AED performed according to Guidelines 2005.

Practical impact of the European Resuscitation Council's BLS algorithm 2005.

BACKGROUND: The European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines 2005 have brought major changes in the BLS algorithm. The aim of our investigation was to look for the practical impact of these modifications. METHODS: In a randomized cross-over design we evaluated how adults would adhere to the BLS algorithm of the ERC guidelines 2000 (group A) compared to the guidelines 2005 (group B). The secondary endpoint was to determine the amount of time that elapsed before the start of the chest compressions in the two different groups. Participants were recruited from the streets and an office building of the Austrian Red Cross and were randomized to commence either with A or B. The volunteers were taught the allocated BLS sequence according to their group placement, and before evaluation each of the two groups was given the opportunity to train until they felt confident in using the algorithm. Performance during evaluation was documented automatically with a recording resuscitation manikin (Resusci-Anne, Skill Reporter). RESULTS: Sixty people were included in the study, one individual dropped out after randomisation. In group A 9/59 (15.25%) participants followed the algorithm correctly versus 24/59 (40.68%) in group B (p=0.006). The time to start of chest compressions was significantly shorter in group B (21.31+/-7.11s), compared to group A (36.68+/-11.75s, p<0.01). CONCLUSION: Compared to the 2000 BLS algorithm, the 2005 BLS sequence seems to be easier to learn and to retain, though nearly 60% of participants did not follow the new algorithm correctly. As expected, there was a significantly shorter time elapsing before the start of chest compressions when applying the 2005 algorithm. These findings should translate to better survival after cardiac arrest.

Death in correctional facilities: opportunities for automated external defibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Death due to cardiovascular disease occurs more frequently in prisons than the national average. Due to close surveillance 24 h/day, the ability to reach the patient within 3 min and time consuming access for the EMS crews, it was hypothesised that the deployment of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) might make improvements regarding Call-to-the-First-AED-Prompt (CTP) interval and formed the aim of this study. METHODS: Our investigation was analysed on an intention to treat basis and conducted in a prospective, open and observational design. As the primary outcome, the CTP-intervals were compared to the arrival intervals of the EMS. As a secondary outcome, an analysis of all deceased inmates was described. RESULTS: The average daily population of inmates in Austrian correctional facilities is 7714. During a period of 13 months, 10 instances in which an AED was activated and electrodes attached to a collapsed inmate, were reported. The CTP-interval (median+/-S.D.) was 2.3+/-1.6 S.D. min. It took the EMS 10.0+/-4.3 S.D. min. to arrive at the patient's side. Four out of 10 cases of cardiac arrest occurred due to myocardial infarction. Of 39 deceased inmates, a post mortem examination was completed in 34 cases. In 13 cases, cardiovascular disease was the cause of death. DISCUSSION: The main finding was a four-fold reduction of the CTP-interval. This fact indicates the potential improvements which could be achieved with the deployment of AEDs. Our secondary objective revealed that death due to cardiovascular disease was found in a high proportion and could be considered to be a strong incentive to initiate programmes to counter cardiovascular death in prison.

Nitrous oxide increases the incidence of bowel distension in patients undergoing elective colon resection.

BACKGROUND: Nitrous oxide rapidly inflates gas-filled spaces such as the intestines; but whether the resulting bowel distension is clinically important remains unclear. We therefore tested the hypothesis that nitrous oxide produces clinically important bowel distension. METHODS: Patients scheduled for colon resection were anesthetized with isoflurane and 35% oxygen and randomly assigned to 65% nitrous oxide (n = 175) or 65% nitrogen in air (n = 169). At the end of surgery, blinded surgeons rated the degree of bowel distension as none, mild, moderate, or severe. Patients reported pain, and nausea and vomiting (PONV) 2 h after surgery. Data are reported as means (SD). P < 0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Morphometric and demographic data were similar in the groups. The duration of surgery was 3.0 (1.2) h in the nitrous oxide group and 3.4 (1.5) h in the air group (P = 0.017). Postoperative self-reported pain scores (visual analog scale, 0-100 mm) were greater in the nitrous oxide group (43 [30] mm) than in the air group (35 [31] mm, P = 0.018). Although the incidence of PONV was similar in the groups, VAS scores for nausea were significantly greater in the nitrous oxide group (P = 0.040). Moderate-to-severe bowel distension was observed in 23% of nitrous oxide patients, but in only 9% of patients in the air group (P < 0.001). The number-needed-to-harm for moderate or severe bowel distension from nitrous oxide was thus seven. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that avoiding nitrous oxide administration during prolonged bowel operations will minimize bowel distension and possibly reduce postoperative pain related to it.

Reduction of motion sickness in prehospital trauma care.

Motion sickness adds to the discomfort of many patients being transported by ambulance. Recent research has demonstrated the effectiveness of oxygen therapy in reducing motion sickness during transport to hospital. However, patients reported negative reactions to wearing a facemask, which produced feelings of claustrophobia and anxiety. We therefore tested the hypothesis that supplemental oxygen inhaled from a new oxygen delivery device OxyArm, which avoids direct contact with the patient's skin, may reduce the incidence of motion sickness and increase patient satisfaction. Forty patients suffering from minor trauma were included in a prospective, randomised trial. Twenty patients received oxygen administered using a conventional Venturi mask (group 1), and 20 patients received oxygen using the new OxyArm device (group 2). Measurements made included oxygen saturation (SaO2), heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressures, and patients' subjective score of satisfaction with smell of the device, claustrophobia, inconvenience produced by the oxygen inhalation device and nausea were scored using a visual analogue scale. All patients were haemodynamically stable and comparable between the two groups. Peripheral SaO2 increased in both groups. The scores of nausea and claustrophobia were significantly lower in the OxyArm group, in addition, satisfaction with the OxyArm device was significantly higher. In conclusion, the use of OxyArm device produced a lower incidence of motion sickness combined with the additional benefit of greater patient satisfaction, when compared with a conventional facemask, during prehospital transfer of trauma patients.