Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 5(5): 100927, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36921720

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Category II fetal heart tracing noted during continuous external fetal monitoring is a frequent indication for cesarean delivery in the United States despite its somewhat subjective interpretation. Black patients have higher rates of cesarean delivery and higher rates for this indication. Racial bias in clinical decision-making has been demonstrated throughout medicine, including in obstetrics. OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine if racial bias affects providers' decisions about cesarean delivery for an indication of category II fetal heart tracings. STUDY DESIGN: We constructed an online survey study consisting of 2 clinical scenarios of patients in labor with category II tracings. Patient race was randomized to Black and White; the vignettes were otherwise identical. Participants had the option to continue with labor or to proceed with a cesarean delivery at 3 decision points in each scenario. Participants reported their own demographics anonymously. This survey was distributed to obstetrical providers via email, listserv, and social media. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests at each decision point in the overall sample and in subgroup analyses by various participant demographics. RESULTS: A total of 726 participants contributed to the study. We did not find significant racial bias in cesarean delivery decision-making overall. However, in a scenario of a patient with a previous cesarean delivery, Fisher's exact tests showed that providers <40 years old (n=322; P=.01) and those with <10 years of experience (n=239; P=.050) opted for a cesarean delivery for Black patients more frequently than for White patients at the first decision point. As labor progressed in this scenario, the rates of cesarean delivery equalized across patient race. CONCLUSION: Younger providers and those with fewer years of clinical experience demonstrated racial bias in cesarean delivery decision-making at the first decision point early in labor. Providers did not show racial bias as labor progressed, nor in the scenario with a patient without a previous cesarean delivery. This bias may be the consequence of provider training with the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Calculator, developed in 2007, and widely used to estimate the probability of successful vaginal birth after a cesarean delivery. This calculator used race as a predictive factor until it was removed in June 2021. Future studies should investigate if this bias persists following this change, while also focusing on interventions to address these findings.


Subject(s)
Labor, Obstetric , Obstetrics , Racism , Vaginal Birth after Cesarean , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Cesarean Section , United States , Clinical Decision-Making , Black or African American , White
2.
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) ; 1(1): 463-467, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33786512

ABSTRACT

Some women have underlying cardiovascular disease that leads to increased morbidity and mortality with pregnancy. These women may choose to terminate a pregnancy rather than face this increased risk. The optimal approach for pregnancy termination in women with cardiomyopathy is not well defined. We present two women with peripartum cardiomyopathy, both modified World Health Organization (mWHO) class IV and with elevated Cardiac Disease in Pregnancy (CARPREG II) pregnancy risk stratification scores who are at the highest risk for pregnancy continuation. Both underwent induced abortion, although the procedure was performed in very different settings. These cases illustrate factors that influence the mode and setting of pregnancy termination performance.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...