Supportive telephone intervention for patients receiving chemotherapy. A pilot study.

Psychosocial interventions have been shown to improve quality of life (QOL) for many cancer patients. A pilot study was conducted to assess the feasibility of a psychoeducational intervention for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Eight patients receiving chemotherapy for colorectal carcinoma participated. The intervention is based on a modification of Interpersonal Therapy. It consisted of four sessions, administered biweekly, using a manual format, by a psychiatric nurse clinician over the telephone. The participants also completed a set of QOL measures by telephone to assess tolerance of the planned assessment. The patients received assistance with treatment-related side effects, reported improved ability to communicate with their physician, and gained an understanding of the stresses they discussed. The patients felt satisfied with the emotional support and medical information provided. A randomized trial is planned to test the intervention for patients participating in a cooperative trial sponsored by the National Cancer Institute.

Cisplatin, vinblastine, and hydrazine sulfate in advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind phase III study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: To assess the chemotherapy regimen of cisplatin, vinblastine, and hydrazine sulfate administered to patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind phase III study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 25, 1989 and February 1, 1991, 291 patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC and performance status 0 or 1 were randomized to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) every 28 days, vinblastine 5 mg/m2 IV per week times five, then every 2 weeks; and either hydrazine sulfate 60 mg three times per day orally or placebo. The concurrent use of corticosteroids, medroxyprogesterone, or other appetite stimulants was not permitted. Treatment groups were comparable for known prognostic variables. The primary end point of this study was survival; however, the influence of hydrazine sulfate on nutritional status, performance status, and quality of life was also assessed. RESULTS: Analysis of 266 eligible patients showed a median survival duration of 7.78 months for the hydrazine sulfate-treated group compared with 7.70 months for the placebo-treated group (P = .65, log-rank). Objective response rates were similar for the two groups, with 4% complete responses, 20% partial responses, and 2% regressions in those treated with hydrazine sulfate; 3% complete responses, 23% partial responses, and 2% regressions in those who received placebo. The major toxicity was severe or life-threatening neutropenia, which occurred in 65% of hydrazine sulfate patients and 63% of placebo patients. There were no differences noted between the two groups in degree of anorexia, weight gain or loss, or overall nutritional status. Sensory and motor neuropathy occurred significantly more often in patients treated with hydrazine sulfate. Quality of life was significantly worse in patients who received hydrazine sulfate. CONCLUSION: This study suggests no benefit from the addition of hydrazine sulfate to an effective cytotoxic regimen.

Antiemetic-induced akathisia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.

A structured, prospective telephone interview was used to assess the prevalence of akathisia in 24 cancer patients receiving metoclopramide or prochlorperazine during or after chemotherapy. Half of the patients reported subjective motor restlessness, and 75% stated that they would not have informed staff. This report suggests that akathisia is frequently unrecognized in chemotherapy patients receiving metoclopramide and prochlorperazine.

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.

BACKGROUND: In 1986, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) initiated a research program to develop an integrated, modular approach for evaluating the quality of life of patients participating in international clinical trials. PURPOSE: We report here the results of an international field study of the practicality, reliability, and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30, the current core questionnaire. The QLQ-C30 incorporates nine multi-item scales: five functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); three symptom scales (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Several single-item symptom measures are also included. METHODS: The questionnaire was administered before treatment and once during treatment to 305 patients with nonresectable lung cancer from centers in 13 countries. Clinical variables assessed included disease stage, weight loss, performance status, and treatment toxicity. RESULTS: The average time required to complete the questionnaire was approximately 11 minutes, and most patients required no assistance. The data supported the hypothesized scale structure of the questionnaire with the exception of role functioning (work and household activities), which was also the only multi-item scale that failed to meet the minimal standards for reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient > or = .70) either before or during treatment. Validity was shown by three findings. First, while all interscale correlations were statistically significant, the correlation was moderate, indicating that the scales were assessing distinct components of the quality-of-life construct. Second, most of the functional and symptom measures discriminated clearly between patients differing in clinical status as defined by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scale, weight loss, and treatment toxicity. Third, there were statistically significant changes, in the expected direction, in physical and role functioning, global quality of life, fatigue, and nausea and vomiting, for patients whose performance status had improved or worsened during treatment. The reliability and validity of the questionnaire were highly consistent across the three language-cultural groups studied: patients from English-speaking countries, Northern Europe, and Southern Europe. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the EORTC QLQ-C30 as a reliable and valid measure of the quality of life of cancer patients in multicultural clinical research settings. Work is ongoing to examine the performance of the questionnaire among more heterogenous patient samples and in phase II and phase III clinical trials.