ABSTRACT
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a public health crisis affecting one in three women and one in ten men in their lifetimes. Rehabilitation professionals are highly likely to encounter survivors of IPV in their practice; yet, there exists no formal review assessing the relationship between IPV and rehabilitation. Our objective was to understand the types and contexts of rehabilitation care currently available for survivors of IPV, opportunities identified in the literature for rehabilitation care, and IPV awareness and education among rehabilitation providers. A search strategy related to IPV and four rehabilitation professionals of interest (occupational therapy, physiotherapy, speech-language pathology/therapy, and physiatry) was developed across 10 databases and complemented by a gray literature search. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for inclusion. In all, 44 articles met inclusion criteria, ranging from primary research articles (48%) to clinical newsletters. Included articles predominantly focused on opportunities for rehabilitation care (68%) and occupational therapists as a profession (68%). A minority of studies examined specific interventions for IPV survivors (18%) or assessed for knowledge and attitudes about IPV (16%) among rehabilitation professionals. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review exploring the rehabilitation literature for IPV survivors. These findings show an awareness of IPV among rehabilitation professionals, the importance of identifying IPV in clients, and the ways in which rehabilitation professionals are uniquely situated to support survivors of IPV. There remains an opportunity to explore interventions designed specifically for IPV survivors.
Subject(s)
Intimate Partner Violence , Male , Female , Humans , Survivors , Public HealthABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgical intervention for submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is more common in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q DS) compared to children without 22q DS. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary pediatric hospital and 22q11.2 DS specialty clinic. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-two children seen at the tertiary hospital or clinic during a 20-year period (June 1999-June 2019) with documented SMCP with and without 22q DS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Percentage of children with SMCP with and without 22q DS requiring surgical intervention for velopharyngeal insufficiency. RESULTS: Patients with 22q DS had a significantly higher frequency of SMCP repair than those without 22q DS (89.7% vs 32.0%, P < .001, χ2 = 37.75). The odds of requiring SMCP repair were 18.6 times higher in those with 22q DS compared to those without (odds ratio = 18.6, CI = 6.1-56.6). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new evidence suggesting patients with 22q DS require SMCP surgical repair for velopharyngeal insufficiency at a significantly higher rate than those without 22q DS. As the majority of patients with 22q DS with SMCP require surgical intervention, future prospective studies looking at early versus late repair of SMCP in patients with 22q DS are needed to guide the surgical repair timeline in this population.
