ProExC triage of atypical glandular cells on liquid-based cervical cytology specimens.

OBJECTIVE: Morphologic distinction between atypical glandular cells not otherwise specified (AGC-NOS) and AGC-favor neoplasia (AGC-FN) can be difficult. Distinction between these entities is important as the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology 2006 consensus guidelines state that management of AGC-NOS differs from that of AGC-FN. The objective of this study was to determine the potential role of ProExC immunocytochemical triage of AGC-NOS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cytopathology records from a pathology practice were reviewed from January 2006 to December 2009 to identify AGC-NOS liquid-based Pap smears with subsequent biopsy correlation. Archival slides were examined, and ProExC immunocytochemistry was performed. The AGC groups were assessed for nuclear staining, and results were correlated with subsequent biopsy findings. RESULTS: Twenty-eight AGC-NOS cases with biopsy correlation were identified: 13 with subsequent high-grade neoplastic or malignant (positive) diagnoses and 15 with benign diagnoses. Of 13 AGC-NOS cases with positive diagnosis, 10 were ProExC-positive and 3 were ProExC-negative (metastatic tumors from distant sites). Of 15 AGC cases with benign follow-up, 13 were ProExC-negative and 2 were ProExC-positive (sensitivity, 77%; specificity, 87%). For patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or carcinoma originating from the female genital tract, 100% (10/10) were ProExC-positive (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 87%). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that ProExC-positive AGC-NOS may be classified as AGC-FN. Although positive immunocytochemical staining for ProExC requires management similar to AGC-FN, negative staining does not rule out malignancy such as metastatic tumor. Management for ProExC-negative AGC-NOS cases should proceed according to the current guidelines for AGC-NOS.

Oncogenic human papillomavirus testing in an adolescent population with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.

OBJECTIVE: The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology 2006 consensus guidelines state that oncogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing is unacceptable for patients 20 years and younger with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US). The objective of this study is to determine the HPV frequency in ASC-US patients 20 years and younger and to investigate subsequent colposcopic diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cytopathology records at the University of Florida/Shands-UF were reviewed from March 2003 to June 2007 to identify patients 20 years and younger with ASC-US on screening Pap tests. Human papillomavirus test results and subsequent colposcopic diagnoses were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 333 patients were identified. Seventy-five were not HPV tested. Of the remaining 258, 127 (49%) were negative(-) for HPV, whereas 131 (51%) were HPV positive(+).In the HPV(-) population (n=127), 3 (2%) patients were referred for colposcopy and had benign findings. In the HPV(+) population (n=131), 48 (37%) patients were referred for colposcopy. Of these 48, 25 had benign colposcopic findings, 12 had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN 1), and 11 had CIN 2/3. No invasive disease was identified. Nine of the 11 patients with CIN 2/3 were 18 years and older. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution, 51% of ASC-US patients 20 years and younger were HPV(+). Colposcopy with subsequent histological diagnosis, available on 48 patients, demonstrated 11 (23%) of the HPV(+) group to have CIN 2/3. The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines recommend observation (via repeat colposcopy and cytology) for adolescents with CIN 2 and treatment (via excision or ablation) for CIN 3. Human papillomavirus testing ASC-US adolescents in our institution may be "acceptable."