Clinical Outcome of Non-Surgical Root Canal Treatment Using a Single-cone Technique with Endosequence Bioceramic Sealer: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: One of the important steps in root canal treatment is to create a well-sealed root canal system. EndoSequence BC Sealer (BC; Brasseler USA, Savannah, GA) has several beneficial properties and thus has been incorporated into the practitioner's armamentarium. No studies to date have evaluated the clinical success of using BC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of nonsurgical root canal treatment using a single-cone and BC technique and to identify factors associated with success or failure. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated in a private practice environment between 2009 and 2015. All cases, including initial and retreatment, were obturated with BC using a single-cone technique with a minimum of a 1-year recall. Patient and treatment factors were analyzed to determine their significance as prognostic factors. Outcome was evaluated based on clinical and radiographic findings at recall. Teeth were classified as healed, healing (success), or not healed (failure). Statistical analysis of potential prognostic factors was performed using the chi-square test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Three hundred seven teeth were included in the analysis, and the average follow-up time was 30.1 months. The overall success rate was 90.9%. Lesions <5 mm in diameter had a significantly higher success rate than lesions >5 mm in diameter. Sealer extrusion was observed in 47.4% of the cases. The presence of sealer extrusion did not have any significant effect on the treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: BC used with a single-cone technique is a viable option for obturation.

Irrigants in non-surgical endodontic treatment.

This paper highlights that one of the main goals of root canal treatment is the elimination of microorganisms from the contaminated root canal system. Instrumentation alone will not allow for adequate debridement and disinfection of the complex and diverse root canal system. Chemomechanical debridement is required. The importance of the use of irrigants during non-surgical root canal treatment has frequently been neglected both during instruction of dental students and later in the clinical practice of endodontics. The article highlights 'shape, clean and fill' vs. 'clean, shape and fill' to enable chemomechanical debridement. Our protocol advises mechanical debridement and copious irrigation for a minimum of twenty minutes with 2.5% to 6% solutions of sodium hypochlorite, followed by a rinse with a 17% solution of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid and a final rinse with 2% chlorhexidine. The canals are dried with high volume aspirators and sterile paper points.

Endodontic diagnosis: clinical aspects.

The objectives of this article are to review classic and current concepts on endodontic diagnosis, to describe the current classification of the pulp and periradicular diseases and to present and discuss the diagnostic tools available for endodontic diagnosis. The "SOAP" approach to endodontic diagnosis is a very efficient and simple method to accomplish accurate diagnosis. SOAP serves as a mnemonic to guide the clinician in data collection and stands for: Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan.

Efficacy of retreatment techniques for a resin-based root canal obturation material.

Resilon/Epiphany obturation system is emerging as an alternative to gutta-percha (GP). The efficacy of retreatment techniques for Resilon removal has not been determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two commonly used retreatment techniques in the removal of Resilon. Sixty single-canal teeth were instrumented and obturated with either Resilon/Epiphany or GP/AH Plus. Each canal was randomly allocated to receive one of the two retreatment techniques-ProFile 0.06 rotary files combined with heat or chloroform. The time required to remove the obturation material was recorded and the cleanliness of canal walls was determined by stereomicroscope and electron microscopy. The results demonstrated that chloroform combined with rotary files was more efficient in material removal compared to heat (p < 0.05). Resilon was faster to remove than GP. Both techniques resulted in cleaner canal walls in the apical third of the teeth obturated with Resilon when compared to GP (p < 0.05).