Alarm Management in Intensive Care: Qualitative Triangulation Study.

BACKGROUND: The high number of unnecessary alarms in intensive care settings leads to alarm fatigue among staff and threatens patient safety. To develop and implement effective and sustainable solutions for alarm management in intensive care units (ICUs), an understanding of staff interactions with the patient monitoring system and alarm management practices is essential. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the interaction of nurses and physicians with the patient monitoring system, their perceptions of alarm management, and smart alarm management solutions. METHODS: This explorative qualitative study with an ethnographic, multimethods approach was conducted in an ICU of a German university hospital. Using triangulation in data collection, 102 hours of field observations, 12 semistructured interviews with ICU staff members, and the results of a participatory task were analyzed. The data analysis followed an inductive, grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Nurses and physicians reported interacting with the continuous vital sign monitoring system for most of their work time and tasks. There were no established standards for alarm management; instead, nurses and physicians stated that alarms were addressed through ad hoc reactions, a practice they viewed as problematic. Staff members' perceptions of intelligent alarm management varied, but they highlighted the importance of understandable and traceable suggestions to increase trust and cognitive ease. CONCLUSIONS: Staff members' interactions with the omnipresent patient monitoring system and its alarms are essential parts of ICU workflows and clinical decision-making. Alarm management standards and workflows have been shown to be deficient. Our observations, as well as staff feedback, suggest that changes are warranted. Solutions for alarm management should be designed and implemented with users, workflows, and real-world data at the core.

ARTEMIS: An alarm threshold and policy mining system for the intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Alarm fatigue is a major technology-induced hazard for patients and staff in intensive care units. Too many - mostly unnecessary - alarms cause desensitisation and lack of response in medical staff. Unsuitable alarm policies are one reason for alarm fatigue. But changing alarm policies is a delicate issue since it concerns patient safety. OBJECTIVE: We present ARTEMIS, a novel, computer-aided clinical decision support system for policy makers that can help to considerably improve alarm policies using data from hospital information systems. METHODS: Policy makers can use different policy components from ARTEMIS' internal library to assemble tailor-made alarm policies for their intensive care units. Alternatively, policy makers can provide even more highly customised policy components as Python functions using data the hospital information systems. This can even include machine learning models - for example for setting alarm thresholds. Finally, policy makers can evaluate their system of policies and compare the resulting alarm loads. RESULTS: ARTEMIS reports and compares numbers of alarms caused by different alarm policies for an easily adaptable target population. ARTEMIS can compare policies side-by-side and provides grid comparisons and heat maps for parameter optimisation. For example, we found that the utility of alarm delays varies based on target population. Furthermore, policy makers can introduce virtual parameters that are not in the original data by providing a formula to compute them. Virtual parameters help measuring and alarming on the right metric, even if the patient monitors do not directly measure this metric. CONCLUSION: ARTEMIS does not release the policy maker from assessing the policy from a medical standpoint. But as a knowledge discovery and clinical decision support system, it provides a strong quantitative foundation for medical decisions. At comparatively low cost of implementation, ARTEMIS can have a substantial impact on patients and staff alike - with organisational, economic, and clinical benefits for the implementing hospital.

A Standardized Clinical Data Harmonization Pipeline for Scalable AI Application Deployment (FHIR-DHP): Validation and Usability Study.

BACKGROUND: Increasing digitalization in the medical domain gives rise to large amounts of health care data, which has the potential to expand clinical knowledge and transform patient care if leveraged through artificial intelligence (AI). Yet, big data and AI oftentimes cannot unlock their full potential at scale, owing to nonstandardized data formats, lack of technical and semantic data interoperability, and limited cooperation between stakeholders in the health care system. Despite the existence of standardized data formats for the medical domain, such as Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR), their prevalence and usability for AI remain limited. OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we developed a data harmonization pipeline (DHP) for clinical data sets relying on the common FHIR data standard. METHODS: We validated the performance and usability of our FHIR-DHP with data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database. RESULTS: We present the FHIR-DHP workflow in respect of the transformation of "raw" hospital records into a harmonized, AI-friendly data representation. The pipeline consists of the following 5 key preprocessing steps: querying of data from hospital database, FHIR mapping, syntactic validation, transfer of harmonized data into the patient-model database, and export of data in an AI-friendly format for further medical applications. A detailed example of FHIR-DHP execution was presented for clinical diagnoses records. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach enables the scalable and needs-driven data modeling of large and heterogenous clinical data sets. The FHIR-DHP is a pivotal step toward increasing cooperation, interoperability, and quality of patient care in the clinical routine and for medical research.

The influence of patient characteristics on the alarm rate in intensive care units: a retrospective cohort study.

Intensive care units (ICU) are often overflooded with alarms from monitoring devices which constitutes a hazard to both staff and patients. To date, the suggested solutions to excessive monitoring alarms have remained on a research level. We aimed to identify patient characteristics that affect the ICU alarm rate with the goal of proposing a straightforward solution that can easily be implemented in ICUs. Alarm logs from eight adult ICUs of a tertiary care university-hospital in Berlin, Germany were retrospectively collected between September 2019 and March 2021. Adult patients admitted to the ICU with at least 24 h of continuous alarm logs were included in the study. The sum of alarms per patient per day was calculated. The median was 119. A total of 26,890 observations from 3205 patients were included. 23 variables were extracted from patients' electronic health records (EHR) and a multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of patient characteristics and alarm rates. Invasive blood pressure monitoring (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.68, 95%CI 4.15-5.29, p < 0.001), invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR 1.24, 95%CI 1.16-1.32, p < 0.001), heart failure (aOR 1.26, 95%CI 1.19-1.35, p < 0.001), chronic renal failure (aOR 1.18, 95%CI 1.10-1.27, p < 0.001), hypertension (aOR 1.19, 95%CI 1.13-1.26, p < 0.001), high RASS (aOR 1.22, 95%CI 1.18-1.25, p < 0.001) and scheduled surgical admission (aOR 1.22, 95%CI 1.13-1.32, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with a high alarm rate. Our study suggests that patient-specific alarm management should be integrated in the clinical routine of ICUs. To reduce the overall alarm load, particular attention regarding alarm management should be paid to patients with invasive blood pressure monitoring, invasive mechanical ventilation, heart failure, chronic renal failure, hypertension, high RASS or scheduled surgical admission since they are more likely to have a high contribution to noise pollution, alarm fatigue and hence compromised patient safety in ICUs.

Utilizing Intensive Care Alarms for Machine Learning.

Alarms help to detect medical conditions in intensive care units and improve patient safety. However, up to 99% of alarms are non-actionable, i.e. alarm that did not trigger a medical intervention in a defined time frame. Reducing their amount through machine learning (ML) is hypothesized to be a promising approach to improve patient monitoring and alarm management. This retrospective study presents the technical and medical pre-processing steps to annotate alarms into actionable and non-actionable, creating a basis for ML applications.