Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Oncol ; 15(8): 2894-904, 1997 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9256133

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The HER-2/neu gene codes for a membrane receptor protein that is homologous, but distinct from the epidermal growth factor receptor. This investigation was performed to validate fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as a sensitive and specific method for assessing HER-2/neu gene amplification in archival tissue and to test whether this alteration is associated with poor prognosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HER-2/neu gene amplification was determined by FISH in 140 archival breast cancers, previously characterized for gene amplification by Southern hybridization or dot-blot hybridization, and for gene expression by Northern hybridization, Western immunoblot, or immunohistochemistry. A separate cohort of 324 node-negative breast cancers was assessed for amplification by FISH to determine the utility of HER-2/neu gene amplification. RESULTS: Relative to solid-matrix blotting procedures, FISH analysis of HER-2/neu gene amplification showed a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 100% in 140 breast cancers. Among patients treated by surgery only, the relative risks (relative hazard) of early recurrence (recurrent disease within 24 months of diagnosis), recurrent disease (at any time), and disease-related death were statistically significantly associated with amplification. The prognostic information contributed by HER-2/neu amplification was independent of the other markers studied. CONCLUSION: FISH was an alternative technique for determining gene amplification and had some distinct advantages over Southern hybridization. Our results demonstrate that HER-2/neu gene amplification in the absence of adjuvant therapy is an independent predictor of poor clinical outcome and is a stronger discriminant than tumor size. Women with small tumors that had gene amplification were at increased risk of recurrence and disease-related death.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Gene Amplification , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Aged , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/genetics , Breast Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Humans , Immunoblotting , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Lymphatic Metastasis , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Prognosis , Sensitivity and Specificity , Survival Rate
3.
Am J Med Genet ; 51(4): 474-81, 1994 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7943023

ABSTRACT

We describe a pilot project utilizing saliva to identify the FMR-1 mutation in high-risk special education students from four public school districts in Colorado. The program included presentations to special education teachers regarding fragile X syndrome, parental consent for testing, completion of a behavior checklist by the teachers, identification of special education students at high risk for fragile X syndrome, subsequent brief examination of face and hands, collection of a saliva sample by either Gatorade swish or brushing of the inside of the cheek, and analysis for the FMR-1 mutation by PCR. Equivocal samples were studied by direct DNA testing using Southern blot analysis, and abnormal results were confirmed by a blood analysis for the FMR-1 mutation. Mutant individuals received genetic counseling and medical and educational assessments to optimize treatment and intervention. This pilot project was met with enthusiasm by the schools. Of the first 439 students evaluated, 68% were male with an average age of 7.75 years; 13% were mentally retarded or autistic. Most students referred for the evaluation were learning disabled (51%) and/or had an Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) (35%). The overall prevalence of the FMR-1 mutation was 5 of 439 or 1.1%. This relatively low yield is probably due to the high number of non-retarded but learning disabled students tested. Of the mentally retarded patients tested, 3.5% were positive for the FMR-1 mutation; however, of the non-retarded or learning disabled patients, only 0.79% were FMR-1 positive.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Fragile X Syndrome/diagnosis , Genetic Testing/methods , Mouth Mucosa/chemistry , Saliva/chemistry , Adolescent , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/diagnosis , Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity/genetics , Autistic Disorder/diagnosis , Autistic Disorder/genetics , Blotting, Southern , Child , Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/diagnosis , Child Development Disorders, Pervasive/etiology , Child, Preschool , DNA Mutational Analysis , DNA Probes , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Fragile X Syndrome/genetics , Genetic Carrier Screening , Humans , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Learning Disabilities/diagnosis , Learning Disabilities/genetics , Leukocytes/chemistry , Male , Pilot Projects , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...