Alteration of topoisomerase II-alpha gene in human breast cancer: association with responsiveness to anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Approximately 35% of HER2-amplified breast cancers have coamplification of the topoisomerase II-alpha (TOP2A) gene encoding an enzyme that is a major target of anthracyclines. This study was designed to evaluate whether TOP2A gene alterations may predict incremental responsiveness to anthracyclines in some breast cancers. METHODS: A total of 4,943 breast cancers were analyzed for alterations in TOP2A and HER2. Primary tumor tissues from patients with metastatic breast cancer treated in a trial of chemotherapy plus/minus trastuzumab were studied for amplification/deletion of TOP2A and HER2 as a test set followed by evaluation of malignancies from two separate, large trials for changes in these same genes as a validation set. Association between these alterations and clinical outcomes was determined. RESULTS: Test set cases containing HER2 amplification treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) plus trastuzumab, demonstrated longer progression-free survival compared to those treated with AC alone (P = .0002). However, patients treated with AC alone whose tumors contain HER2/TOP2A coamplification experienced a similar improvement in survival (P = .004). Conversely, for patients treated with paclitaxel, HER2/TOP2A coamplification was not associated with improved outcomes. These observations were confirmed in a larger validation set, where HER2/TOP2A coamplification was again associated with longer survival when only anthracycline-containing chemotherapy was used for treatment compared with outcome in HER2-positive cancers lacking TOP2A coamplification. CONCLUSION: In a study involving nearly 5,000 breast malignancies, both test set and validation set demonstrate that TOP2A coamplification, not HER2 amplification, is the clinically useful predictive marker of an incremental response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Absence of HER2/TOP2A coamplification may indicate a more restricted efficacy advantage for breast cancers than previously thought.

Clinical evaluation of a multi-target fluorescent in situ hybridization assay for detection of bladder cancer.

PURPOSE: The UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization assay (UroVysion Bladder Cancer Recurrence Kit, Vysis, Inc., Downers Grove, Illinois) is a multi-target assay that detects aneuploidy of chromosomes 3, 7 and 17, and loss of the 9p21 band in exfoliated cells in urine from patients with transitional cell carcinoma. We performed 2 multicenter trials. In 1 trial we compared the sensitivity of the FISH assay to the BTA Stat test (Bion Scientific, Redmond, Washington) and voided cytology in the detection of transitional cell carcinoma. In a separate study of healthy volunteers and patients with other (nontransitional cell carcinoma) conditions we determined the specificity of the FISH assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 176 patients with transitional cell carcinoma in the previous 9 months provided voided urine before cystoscopy. Each specimen was split, preserved and shipped to a central laboratory where all 3 tests were performed. All sites were blinded to results. Sensitivity calculations were based on central pathology review of resected tissue. Specificity was determined by testing 275 volunteers who were healthy and with nontransitional cell carcinoma conditions. RESULTS: The 21 sites enrolled 176 patients with a history of transitional cell carcinoma, with 62 recurrences while undergoing surveillance. Overall sensitivities (with 95% CI) were FISH 71% (95% CI 58 to 82), BTA Stat test 50% (37 to 63) and cytology 26% (16 to 39). FISH was negative in 260 of the 275 healthy volunteers or patients with no history of transitional cell carcinoma (specificity 94.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity of the FISH assay is superior to that of cytology and at least equivalent to the BTA Stat test in detecting recurrent transitional cell carcinoma. Its specificity approaches that of cytology. Further testing of its clinical use is warranted.

Evaluation of HER-2/neu gene amplification and overexpression: comparison of frequently used assay methods in a molecularly characterized cohort of breast cancer specimens.

PURPOSE: To compare and evaluate HER-2/neu clinical assay methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventeen breast cancer specimens with known HER-2/neu amplification and overexpression status were assayed with four different immunohistochemical assays and two different fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays. RESULTS: The accuracy of the FISH assays for HER-2/neu gene amplification was high, 97.4% for the Vysis PathVision assay (Vysis, Inc, Downers Grove, IL) and 95.7% for the the Ventana INFORM assay (Ventana, Medical Systems, Inc, Tucson, AZ). The immunohistochemical assay with the highest accuracy for HER-2/neu overexpression was obtained with R60 polyclonal antibody (96.6%), followed by immunohistochemical assays performed with 10H8 monoclonal antibody (95.7%), the Ventana CB11 monoclonal antibody (89.7%), and the DAKO HercepTest (88.9%; Dako, Corp, Carpinteria, CA). Only the sensitivities, and therefore, overall accuracy, of the DAKO Herceptest and Ventana CB11 immunohistochemical assays were significantly different from the more sensitive FISH assay. CONCLUSION: Based on these findings, the FISH assays were highly accurate, with immunohistochemical assays performed with R60 and 10H8 nearly as accurate. The DAKO HercepTest and the Ventana CB11 immunohistochemical assay were statistically significantly different from the Vysis FISH assay in evaluating these previously molecularly characterized breast cancer specimens.