Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Med ; 13(10)2024 May 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38792387

ABSTRACT

Background: Lipedema is a subcutaneous adipose tissue disorder characterized by increased pathological adipocytes mainly in the extremities. Vitamin D is stored in adipocytes, and serum levels inversely correlate with BMI. As adipocytes are removed during liposuction, lipedema patients might be prone to further substantial vitamin D loss while their levels are already decreased. Therefore, we examined the effect of liposuction on perioperative serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Methods: In patients undergoing lipedema liposuction, blood samples were obtained pre- and postoperatively. Statistical analyses were performed to correlate the volume of lipoaspirate, patients' BMI and number of sessions to vitamin D levels. Results: Overall, 213 patients were analyzed. Mean liposuction volume was 6615.33 ± 3884.25 mL, mean BMI was 32.18 ± 7.26 kg/m2. mean preoperative vitamin D levels were 30.1 ± 14.45 ng/mL (borderline deficient according to the endocrine society) and mean postoperative vitamin D levels were 21.91 ± 9.18 ng/mL (deficient). A significant decrease in serum vitamin D was seen in our patients (p < 0.001) of mean 7.83 ng/mL. The amount of vitamin D loss was not associated with BMI or aspiration volume in our patients (p > 0.05). Interestingly, vitamin D dynamics showed a steady drop regardless of volume aspirated or preoperative levels. Conclusions: Many lipedema patients have low vitamin D levels preoperatively. Liposuction significantly reduced these levels additionally, regardless of aspirated volume or BMI. However, vitamin D loss was constant and predictable; thus, patients at risk are easily identified. Overall, lipedema patients undergoing liposuction are prone to vitamin D deficiency, and the long-term effects in this population are currently unknown.

2.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 153(1): 76-89, 2024 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37036325

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-related complications can be reduced by strict antiseptic precautions during insertion, but bacteria can often be found on implant surfaces on the occasion of revision surgery. The authors prospectively analyzed the association of bacteria found on breast implant surfaces with implant-related complications in breast implant revision cases. METHODS: The authors analyzed a total of 100 breast implant revisions in 66 patients between August of 2018 and January of 2021. Capsular swabs and capsular samples were taken intraoperatively. Analyses on the occurrence of bacteria and the occurrence of implant-related complications were performed. In addition, correlations between bacteria-contaminated breast implant surfaces and implant-related complications were performed. RESULTS: Implant-related complications (perforation, rupture, capsular contraction) were observed in 42 implant sites: eight unilateral and 34 bilateral cases. In total, 16 swabs showed positive bacterial growth, 10 of which were associated with a breast implant-related complication (χ 2 = x, y, and z; P = 0.006). The most common implant-based complication at contaminated prosthetics was implant rupture. The association of contaminated breast implants and implant rupture was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The authors identified a correlation between implant complications and Gram-positive bacteria found on breast implant surfaces. The most common implant-based complication seen at simultaneously positive samples was implant rupture in 50% of the authors' cases. No capsular contraction or other complications were seen. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.


Subject(s)
Breast Implantation , Breast Implants , Mammaplasty , Humans , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Gram-Positive Bacteria
3.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 10(2): e4118, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35198349

ABSTRACT

The palmaris longus muscle is one of the most variant muscles in the human body. Its variations such as the palmaris profundus can cause nerve compression symptoms. Here, we present a case of severe nerve affection due to a palmaris profundus muscle. The palmaris profundus tendon was partially resected at intervention. Pain symptoms started immediately after wearing off of the local anesthetic, and revision surgery had to be performed. Severe traction on the median nerve by the palmaris profundus tendon could be observed at revision. The resection of the palmaris profundus tendon instantly eased the patient's severe pain. At preoperative examination and planning of surgery, the palmaris profundus was not detected. As there is no test for the detection of anatomic variations of the palmaris longus muscle at physical examination, discovering such anomalies is not possible without imaging tools. Ultrasonographic examinations aid in preoperative planning of carpal tunnel release, especially at revision surgeries.

4.
J Clin Med ; 11(3)2022 Feb 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35160259

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical breast reconstruction is an integral part of cancer treatment but must not compromise oncological safety. Patient-dependent risk factors (smoking, BMI, etc.) are said to influence perioperative outcomes and have often been investigated. Here, we analyzed independent perioperative risk factors for increased postoperative blood loss or drainage fluid volume loss and their possible impact. METHODS: Patients undergoing breast reconstructions after breast cancer with either tissue expanders, definitive breast implants, or autologous breast reconstruction were analyzed. The collected data on patients' characteristics, blood, and drainage fluid loss were correlated and statistically investigated. RESULTS: Traditional patient-dependent risk factors did not influence blood loss or drainage volumes. On the contrary, patients with preoperative anemia had significantly higher drainage outputs compared to non-anemic patients (U = 2448.5; p = 0.0012). The administration of low molecular weight heparin showed a tendency of increased drainage output. Similar correlations could be seen in prolonged procedure time, all of which contributed to prolonged hospital stay (τb = 0.371; p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anemia is one of the most critical factors influencing postoperative drainage fluid output. Previously assumed patient-dependent risk factors did not affect drainage output. Preoperative anemia must be monitored, and if possible, treated preoperatively to reduce postoperative morbidity.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...