Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Public Health ; 114(7): 685-689, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38635943

ABSTRACT

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) recognized the need for a research program to address the underlying structural factors that impact health. To inform the development of the NIH Common Fund Community Partnerships to Advance Science for Society (ComPASS) Program, NIH obtained input through community listening sessions. Through its design, ComPASS recognizes the essential role of community organizations as the lead in addressing persistent structural and social challenges to accelerate progress toward advancing health equity. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(7):685-689. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307656).


Subject(s)
Health Equity , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , United States , Humans
2.
BMJ Open ; 8(11): e022701, 2018 11 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30413505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The current article seeks to examine the ways in which African-American women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) describe their disease experience and how they cope with their disease. This qualitative study provides deeper insight into whether experiences of African-American women with SLE differ from previous qualitative study findings. METHODS: Qualitative data were gathered using interviews and a focus group, from participants in the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-management (PALS) programme. Data were analysed for themes related to disease experience and how participants cope with their disease. Twenty-seven African-American women with SLE were recruited into the peer mentoring programme, of which 7 served as mentors and 20 served as mentees. A 12-week peer mentoring intervention delivered by phone and based on the Chronic Disease Self-Management and Arthritis Self-Management Programs. RESULTS: Three categories encompassing a total of 10 subcategories emerged from analyses: (A) interpersonal, familialandromantic relationships; (B) individual experiences of living with SLE; and (C) physician-patient relationships. CONCLUSION: We gained insight on several issues related to patient perspectives of African-American women with SLE, and the context surrounding their thoughts and feelings related to lupus, including their providers, families and other social support networks. Additional research efforts could explore and address the thematic domains and respective subthemes identified here. Although limited due to the preliminary nature of the study, this information can be used to create future evidence-based interventions to decrease the impact of SLE on African-American patients.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Black or African American/psychology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/psychology , Adult , Aged , Disease Management , Female , Humans , Mentoring , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life , Self-Management/psychology , Social Support , Young Adult
3.
J Natl Med Assoc ; 110(2): 182-189, 2018 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29580453

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disorder with significant disparate impact on African American women. The current study sought to highlight how the Peer Approaches to Lupus Self-management (PALS) intervention worked bi-directionally wherein both women with SLE leading the disease self-management program (mentors), and those participants who served as mentees, were empowered toward greater disease self-efficacy. METHODS: Data was captured for this study in two formats from the seven mentors participating in the pilot study: 1) mentor logs and 2) mentor interviews with the principle investigator. This information was then analyzed for themes relating to their experience within the study. RESULTS: We found that empowerment was facilitated by mentors taking their mentorship responsibilities seriously and seeking several avenues for collaboratively developing success with their mentees. Mentors reported that although challenges arose, their desire for success resulted in multiple approaches to be flexible and responsive to the needs of their mentees. Additionally, reciprocity was found to be a vital element of the program. CONCLUSIONS: Key thematic areas supported our ability to demonstrate the usefulness of a peer mentoring program for SLE disease self-management on evoking empowerment through reciprocal relationships among mentors and mentees within our study population. Furthermore the feedback from PALS participants yielded very rich and contextual information that can be used as a thematic guide for developing and refining evidence-based interventions that seek to incorporate empowerment into disease self-management efforts for women suffering from SLE.


Subject(s)
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/therapy , Mentors , Patient Participation , Self-Management , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Peer Group , Pilot Projects , Qualitative Research , Self Efficacy
4.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 18(7): 751-60, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26176174

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Explorations of travel impediments among patients suffering from rheumatic diseases have been very limited. Research has consistently indicated a shortage of rheumatologists, resulting in patients potentially having to travel long distances for care. The purpose of our study was to explore how systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients experience travel issues differentially by race and socio-economic status. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews and a brief demographic survey with 10 patients diagnosed with SLE. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using NVivo Analysis Software to facilitate the reporting of recurrent themes and supporting quotations, and an initial codebook was independently developed by two researchers on the study team and then verified together. RESULTS: Patients described three major areas of concern with respect to travel burden in accessing their rheumatologists: reliance on caregivers; meeting financial priorities; and pain and physical limitations. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest general traveling challenges interfering with medical appointment compliance for several participants and the importance of socio-economic issues when considering travel issues. This study highlights an important area with implications for adherence to medical appointments and participation in research among patients with SLE.


Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/therapy , Patient Compliance , Transportation of Patients , Adult , Aged , Caregivers , Cost of Illness , Female , Healthcare Disparities , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/diagnosis , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/ethnology , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Mobility Limitation , Patient Compliance/ethnology , Qualitative Research , Racial Groups , Residence Characteristics , Socioeconomic Factors , South Carolina/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...