Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
J Surg Res ; 298: 209-213, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626718

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Periprocedural anxiety is common in pediatric patients and is characterized by tension, anxiety, irritability, and autonomic activation. Periprocedural anxiety increases during certain events including admission to the preoperative area, separation from caregivers, induction of anesthesia, and IV placement. A study of children aged 2-12 showed that perioperative anxiety in children may be influenced by high parental anxiety and low sociability of the child. While these are nonmodifiable variables in the perioperative setting, there are numerous ways to ameliorate both parental and patient anxiety including the use of certified child life specialists (CCLSs) to aid in child comfort. In this study, our objective was to evaluate the integration of CCLS in our perioperative setting on the rate of benzodiazepine use. METHODS: We used a prospectively maintained database to identify patients undergoing outpatient elective surgical and radiologic procedures from July 2022 to September 2023 and January 2023 to September 2023 respectively. CCLSs were used to work with appropriately aged children in order to decrease the use of benzodiazepines and reduce possible adverse events associated with their use. RESULTS: A total of 2175 pediatric patients were seen by CCLS in same day surgery from July 2022 to September 2023. During this period, midazolam use decreased by an average of 11.4% (range 6.2%-19.3%). An even greater effect was seen in the radiologic group with 73% reduction. No adverse events were reported during this period. CONCLUSIONS: CCLSs working with age-appropriate patients in the periprocedural setting is a useful adjunct in easing anxiety in pediatric patients, reducing the need for periprocedural benzodiazepine administration and the risk of exposure to unintended side effects.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Benzodiazepines , Humans , Pilot Projects , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Male , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Anxiety/prevention & control , Anxiety/etiology , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Midazolam/adverse effects , Prospective Studies
2.
J Am Acad Audiol ; 18(10): 846-62, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18496994

ABSTRACT

Three hundred twenty zinc-air batteries representing four manufacturers (Energizer, Power One, Duracell, and Ray-O-Vac) and four cell sizes (10, 312, 13, and 675) were exposed in a salt spray fog apparatus for 2.5, 5.5, 24, 48, and 72 hours. At the conclusion of each exposure, the batteries were rated blindly for the presence of rust by four experienced audiologists using a four point rating scale. Results revealed significant differences in the rating of rust across the four manufacturers and duration of exposure. No statistically significant difference was found across cell size. Also, the correlation between raters was exceptionally high indicating that each audiologist rated the presence of rust for each battery in a very similar manner. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) techniques were applied and provided answers for the observed differences in rust between the four manufacturers.


Subject(s)
Electric Power Supplies , Hearing Aids , Corrosion , Environmental Exposure/analysis , Equipment Failure Analysis , Humans , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Salts/chemistry , Spectrometry, X-Ray Emission , Surface Properties , Time Factors
3.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 87(12): 1590-6, 2006 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17141638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between time from injury to rehabilitation admission and outcomes for patients with traumatic brain injuries (TBIs). DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: One hundred-bed inpatient rehabilitation facility with a 20-bed brain injury unit. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TBIs discharged from initial inpatient rehabilitation between 2003 and 2004 (N=158). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes examined were functional independence at discharge (motor, cognitive, total FIM scores), rehabilitation length of stay (LOS), and rehabilitation cost. RESULTS: Significant linear trends were observed for time to admission and motor FIM scores, total FIM scores, rehabilitation LOS, and cost. All linear regression models contained time to admission as a significant predictor of rehabilitation outcomes. Over half of the variability in outcomes was explained by predictors including time to admission and case-mix group or individual FIM scores with the exception of discharge motor FIM score, for which only 45% of the variability was explained. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who progress to rehabilitation earlier do better functionally and have lower costs and shorter LOSs. Furthermore, the time to rehabilitation admission is easily calculated and could be used by rehabilitation providers in adjunct with admission FIM scores to estimate resource utilization.


Subject(s)
Brain Injuries/rehabilitation , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Admission , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Brain Injuries/economics , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Disability Evaluation , Female , Humans , Length of Stay , Linear Models , Male , Middle Aged , Rehabilitation Centers , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors
4.
J Healthc Inf Manag ; 18(4): 56-60, 2004.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15537135

ABSTRACT

With the increased interest in evidence-based medicine, Internet access and the growing emphasis on national standards, there is an increased challenge for teaching institutions and nursing services to teach and implement standards. At the same time, electronic clinical documentation tools have started to become a common format for recording nursing notes. The major aim of this paper is to ascertain and assess the availability of clinical nursing tools based on the NANDA, NOC and NIC standards. Faculty at 20 large nursing schools and directors of nursing at 20 hospitals were interviewed regarding the use of nursing standards in clinical documentation packages, not only for teaching purposes but also for use in hospital-based systems to ensure patient safety. A survey tool was utilized that covered questions regarding what nursing standards are being taught in the nursing schools, what standards are encouraged by the hospitals, and teaching initiatives that include clinical documentation tools. Information was collected on how utilizing these standards in a clinical or hospital setting can improve the overall quality of care. Analysis included univariate and bivariate analysis. The consensus between both groups was that the NANDA, NOC and NIC national standards are the most widely taught and utilized. In addition, a training initiative was identified within a large university where a clinical documentation system based on these standards was developed utilizing handheld devices.


Subject(s)
Nursing Records/standards , Nursing/standards , Interviews as Topic , Nursing Diagnosis , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , United States
5.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 24(6): 409-14, 2003 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12828316

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization among patients presenting for hospital admission and to identify risk factors for MRSA colonization. DESIGN: Surveillance cultures were performed at the time of hospital admission to identify patients colonized with S. aureus. A case-control study was performed to identify risk factors for MRSA colonization. SETTING: A tertiary-care academic medical center. PATIENTS: Adults presenting for hospital admission (N = 974). RESULTS: S. aureus was isolated from 205 (21%) of the patients for whom cultures were performed. Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus was isolated from 179 (18.4%) of the patients, and MRSA was isolated from 26 (2.7%) of the patients. All 26 MRSA-colonized patients had been admitted to a healthcare facility in the preceding year, had at least one chronic illness, or both. In multivariate analyses comparing MRSA-colonized patients with control-patients, admission to a nursing home (odds ratio [OR], 16.5; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 1.4 to 192.1; P = .025) or a hospitalization of 5 days or longer during the preceding year (OR, 3.91; CI95, 1.1 to 13.9; P = .035) were independent predictors of MRSA colonization. CONCLUSIONS: Patients colonized with MRSA admitted to this hospital likely acquired the organism during previous encounters with healthcare facilities. There was no evidence that MRSA colonization occurs commonly among low-risk individuals in this community. These data suggest that evaluation of recent healthcare exposures is essential if true community acquisition of MRSA is to be confirmed.


Subject(s)
Carrier State , Carrier State/epidemiology , Carrier State/microbiology , Methicillin Resistance , Staphylococcal Infections/epidemiology , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , Academic Medical Centers , Carrier State/diagnosis , Case-Control Studies , Georgia/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Humans , Nose/microbiology , Population Surveillance , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...