The Effect of Integrating Primary Care and Mental Health Services on Diabetes and Depression: A Multi-site Impact Evaluation on the US-Mexico Border.

BACKGROUND: Health care delivery systems are increasingly integrating physical and mental health services to address patients' complex needs, contain costs, and improve satisfaction. Therefore, it is critical to understand whether adoption of integrated care models is effective in diverse settings. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of integrated care on physical and mental health outcomes among low-income Latino participants on the US-Mexico border. RESEARCH DESIGN: In this quasi-experimental multisite study, individual-level data were pooled from 8 studies of locally adapted integrated care models. SUBJECTS: Participants were 18 years or older and had 1 or more chronic conditions: diabetes, depression, hypertension, or obesity. The study enrolled 4226 participants with 2254 participants in the intervention group and 1972 in the comparison group. MEASURES: Primary outcomes were depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score and blood glucose measured by hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Blood pressure, body mass index, and quality of life were secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Multivariable linear regression analyses indicated intervention participants had significantly lower Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores (ß=-0.39, P=0.03) and HbA1c (ß=-0.14, P=0.02) at 12 months compared with comparison group participants. Stratified analyses showed improvements in HbA1c were even greater among intervention participants who had diabetes, depression, severe and persistent mental illness, were older or female compared with their counterparts in the comparison group. CONCLUSIONS: Health care is constantly transforming, making it critical to study these changes across populations and settings. Findings from this study indicate that integrated care can significantly improve mental and physical health in an underserved Latino population.

Integrated care improves mental health in a medically underserved U.S.-Mexico border population.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic conditions, particularly diabetes, and related health conditions continue to be a major concern in the United States, especially in Hispanic populations. This study evaluated the effect of an integrated behavioral health care model, including promotoras(es), on a primarily Hispanic population living with diabetes. METHOD: Seven hundred fifty-six participants were enrolled in an intervention (n = 329) or comparison group (n = 427) and followed up for 12 months. We used a quasiexperimental design to compare participants who received coordinated integrated behavioral health care with those who received usual care from a federally qualified health center. The outcomes were HbA1c, blood pressure, body mass index, depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9), and quality of life (QoL). These outcomes were analyzed as continuous variables using linear regression with backward model selection. Longitudinal analyses were conducted using a likelihood-based approach to general linear mixed models. RESULTS: A total 563 intervention (n = 239) and comparison (n = 324) participants completed an end point assessment. After adjusting for important covariates, the intervention had a QoL score 5.36 points higher than the comparison participants on average after 12 months. The trajectories of QoL and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 scores differed over time, with intervention participants experiencing greater improvements. There were no statistically significant differences detected for other outcomes. DISCUSSION: Enabling access to services and providers to enhance participants' ability to manage their chronic disease led to positive impacts on mental health. The connection between QoL and diabetes has been of great interest to researchers, including the effects of relationships with promotoras(es). The impact of integrating care on QoL in this vulnerable population is discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Improved diabetes control among low-income Mexican Americans through community-clinical interventions: results of an RCT.

INTRODUCTION: This randomized controlled trial investigated community-clinical intervention strategies for a Mexican American population who had not demonstrated control of their diabetes. We tested a control program (Salud y Vida 1.0) supporting diabetes management versus an enhanced version (Salud y Vida 2.0) for reductions in HbA1c at 12 months. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Adults with uncontrolled diabetes (n=353) were enrolled if they had an HbA1c≥9.0% during a program or doctor's visit between 6 and 36 months of their receipt of SyV 1.0 services, were patients at one of two clinics in local counties, and had an HbA1c≥8.0% at SyV 2.0 baseline enrollment. The control and intervention arms were coordinated by community health workers and the intervention arm included the control program enhanced with medication therapy management; behavioral health services; peer-led support groups; and additional community-based lifestyle programs also open to the family. RESULTS: At 12 months, both study arms improved HbA1c (mean, (CI), Control (-0.47 (-0.74 to -0.20)) and intervention (-0.48 (-0.76 to -0.19)). The intervention group maintained HbA1c levels after month 6, whereas control group HbA1c levels slightly increased (adjusted mean from 9.83% at month 6%-9.90% at month 12). Also, HbA1c was examined by level of participant engagement. The high engagement group showed a decreasing trend over the study period, while control and lower engagement groups failed to maintain HbA1c levels at month 12. CONCLUSIONS: Improved HbA1c was found among a population that had not demonstrated diabetes management prior; however, mean HbA1c values were above clinical guideline recommendations. The randomized control trial findings provide additional evidence that extended time and intervention supports may be needed for populations experiencing inequities in social determinants of health. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04035395.

A reverse colocated integrated care model intervention among persons with severe persistent mental illness at the U.S.-Mexico border: A randomized controlled trial protocol.

Persons with severe persistent mental illness (SPMI)-which includes individuals with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and mood disorders such as major depression-are at high risk for poor health outcomes and premature death. Persons with SPMI are largely absent from research evaluating innovative health care models due to recruitment and retention barriers. This paper presents the protocol for a randomized control trial testing a reverse colocated integrated care model in an SPMI population receiving care at a mental health clinic at the U.S.-Mexico border. The study employs a randomized control trial design to determine whether reverse colocated integrated care improves physical and mental health of persons with SPMI. Participants will be randomized to receive the integrated primary care intervention or usual care (behavioral health only). All study participants will complete baseline, 6-, and 12-month assessments. Study outcomes included blood pressure, HbA1c, cholesterol, body mass index, depression, and adult functioning. Despite challenges in recruiting and retaining SPMI patients, co-locating primary care services within a local mental health authority has the potential to improve health and reduce health disparities experienced by persons with SPMI. The study will determine the impacts of this colocated integrated care model among SPMI patients in a socio-economically disadvantaged region. Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT03881657.

Physiotherapy in rehabilitation of the burn patient

Discusses some of the methods of physiotherapeutic treatment of the burn patient

Physiotherapy in rehabilitation of the burn patient

Discusses some of the methods of physiotherapeutic treatment of the burn patient