Is blood pressure 120-139/80-89 mmHg before 20 weeks a risk factor for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy? A meta-analysis.

AIM: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy affect approximately 10% of pregnant women worldwide with serious fetal and maternal implications. Chronic hypertension is diagnosed prior to 20 weeks of gestation and affects 1.5% of pregnant women. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists defines hypertension in pregnancy as a systolic blood pressure higher than 140 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure higher than 90 mmHg. In real-world clinical practice, practitioners consider the cut-off of 140/90 mmHg as a marker of true hypertension in pregnancy and consider blood pressures lower than that as normal. METHODS: To assess the association between a lower range of blood pressures and the development of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, we performed a meta-analysis of current published studies comparing the occurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in patients with blood pressures of 120-139/80-89 mmHg before 20 weeks to those with blood pressures<120/80 mmHg. RESULTS: We included 24 studies: 12362/106870 (11.6 %) patients with blood pressures of 120-139/80-89 mmHg, and 26044/463280 (5.6 %) with blood pressures lower than 120/80 mmHg, developed hypertensive disorders of pregnancy [risk ratio 2.85 (C.I. 2.47-3.3)] - test for overall effect: Z = 14.1 (p < 0.00001). CONCLUSIONS: We showed evidence of poor pregnancy outcome in patients with blood pressure lower than the routinely accepted cut-off of 140/90 mmHg. Therefore, interventions to mitigate the risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy in women with blood pressures 120-139/80-89 mmHg should be planned in new clinical trials.

LI-RADS to categorize liver nodules in patients at risk of HCC: tool or a gadget in daily practice?

PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness of liver reporting and data system (LI-RADS) to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and to retrospectively evaluate its impact on the adopted therapeutic strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative imaging of 40 of 350 patients (median age 66, 31 M/9 F) submitted to liver resection for suspected HCC, between January 2008 and August 2019, has been retrospectively analyzed by two radiologists with different expertise, according to CT/MRI LI-RADS® v2018, both blinded to clinical and pathological results and untrained to using aforementioned scoring system. RESULTS: The perfect agreement between the readers was about 62.5% (25/40) (Cohen k: 0.41), better for LR-5 category (16/25) and higher in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) investigations (68%; 13/19), which has been demonstrated the modality of choice for diagnosis of high probable and certain HCC, with arterial phase hyperenhancement as the most sensitive and accurate major feature. Compared to final histology, LR4 and LR5 scores assigned by senior radiologist reached sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, PNV) and diagnostic accuracy of 90,9%, 29,0%, 93,8%, 62,5% and 87,5%, respectively, slightly higher than junior's ones. Misdiagnosis of HCC was done by both radiologists in the same two patients: 1 primary hepatic lymphoma (PHL) and 1 regenerative liver nodule (RLN). If LI-RADS would have been applied at the time of pre-surgical imaging, treatment planning would be modified in 10% of patients (4/40); the patient scheduled as LR-3 and finally resulted a focal nodular hyperplasia would have avoided liver resection. CONCLUSIONS: Application of LI-RADS, especially on MRI, may provide a more accurate evaluation of suspected HCC. PHL and RLN are the Achille's heels according to our experience.