Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Genes (Basel) ; 11(4)2020 03 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32218170

ABSTRACT

Modulated electromagnetic fields (wEMFs), as generated by modern communication technologies, have raised concerns about adverse health effects. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies them as "possibly carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2B), yet, the underlying molecular mechanisms initiating and promoting tumorigenesis remain elusive. Here, we comprehensively assess the impact of technologically relevant wEMF modulations on the genome integrity of cultured human cells, investigating cell type-specificities as well as time- and dose-dependencies. Classical and advanced methodologies of genetic toxicology and DNA repair were applied, and key experiments were performed in two separate laboratories. Overall, we found no conclusive evidence for an induction of DNA damage nor for alterations of the DNA repair capacity in cells exposed to several wEMF modulations (i.e., GSM, UMTS, WiFi, and RFID). Previously reported observations of increased DNA damage after exposure of cells to GSM-modulated signals could not be reproduced. Experimental variables, presumably underlying the discrepant observations, were investigated and are discussed. On the basis of our data, we conclude that the possible carcinogenicity of wEMF modulations cannot be explained by an effect on genome integrity through direct DNA damage. However, we cannot exclude non-genotoxic, indirect, or secondary effects of wEMF exposure that may promote tumorigenesis in other ways.


Subject(s)
DNA Damage , Electromagnetic Fields/adverse effects , Fibroblasts/pathology , Lung/pathology , Wireless Technology/instrumentation , Cell Phone , Cells, Cultured , DNA Repair , Fibroblasts/radiation effects , Humans , Lung/radiation effects
2.
Mutat Res ; 683(1-2): 74-83, 2010 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19896957

ABSTRACT

Extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-EMFs) were reported to affect DNA integrity in human cells with evidence based on the Comet assay. These findings were heavily debated for two main reasons; the lack of reproducibility, and the absence of a plausible scientific rationale for how EMFs could damage DNA. Starting out from a replication of the relevant experiments, we performed this study to clarify the existence and explore origin and nature of ELF-EMF induced DNA effects. Our data confirm that intermittent (but not continuous) exposure of human primary fibroblasts to a 50 Hz EMF at a flux density of 1 mT induces a slight but significant increase of DNA fragmentation in the Comet assay, and we provide first evidence for this to be caused by the magnetic rather than the electric field. Moreover, we show that EMF-induced responses in the Comet assay are dependent on cell proliferation, suggesting that processes of DNA replication rather than the DNA itself may be affected. Consistently, the Comet effects correlated with a reduction of actively replicating cells and a concomitant increase of apoptotic cells in exposed cultures, whereas a combined Fpg-Comet test failed to produce evidence for a notable contribution of oxidative DNA base damage. Hence, ELF-EMF induced effects in the Comet assay are reproducible under specific conditions and can be explained by minor disturbances in S-phase processes and occasional triggering of apoptosis rather than by the generation of DNA damage.


Subject(s)
Apoptosis/radiation effects , DNA Fragmentation , Electromagnetic Fields , Fibroblasts/radiation effects , S Phase/physiology , Adult , Child , Comet Assay , HeLa Cells , Humans , Male
3.
PLoS Biol ; 7(4): e91, 2009 Apr 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19402749

ABSTRACT

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU), a chemotherapeutic drug commonly used in cancer treatment, imbalances nucleotide pools, thereby favoring misincorporation of uracil and 5-FU into genomic DNA. The processing of these bases by DNA repair activities was proposed to cause DNA-directed cytotoxicity, but the underlying mechanisms have not been resolved. In this study, we investigated a possible role of thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG), one of four mammalian uracil DNA glycosylases (UDGs), in the cellular response to 5-FU. Using genetic and biochemical tools, we found that inactivation of TDG significantly increases resistance of both mouse and human cancer cells towards 5-FU. We show that excision of DNA-incorporated 5-FU by TDG generates persistent DNA strand breaks, delays S-phase progression, and activates DNA damage signaling, and that the repair of 5-FU-induced DNA strand breaks is more efficient in the absence of TDG. Hence, excision of 5-FU by TDG, but not by other UDGs (UNG2 and SMUG1), prevents efficient downstream processing of the repair intermediate, thereby mediating DNA-directed cytotoxicity. The status of TDG expression in a cancer is therefore likely to determine its response to 5-FU-based chemotherapy.


Subject(s)
Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Cell Death/drug effects , DNA Damage , DNA Repair/drug effects , Fluorouracil/pharmacology , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Thymine DNA Glycosylase/metabolism , Animals , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Cell Cycle/genetics , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA Glycosylases/metabolism , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Mice , Neoplasms/genetics , Signal Transduction , Uracil-DNA Glycosidase/metabolism
4.
Nucleic Acids Res ; 35(11): 3859-67, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17526518

ABSTRACT

Human Thymine-DNA Glycosylase (TDG) is a member of the uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) superfamily. It excises uracil, thymine and a number of chemical base lesions when mispaired with guanine in double-stranded DNA. These activities are not unique to TDG; at least three additional proteins with similar enzymatic properties are present in mammalian cells. The successful co-evolution of these enzymes implies the existence of non-redundant biological functions that must be coordinated. Here, we report cell cycle regulation as a mechanism for the functional separation of apparently redundant DNA glycosylases. We show that cells entering S-phase eliminate TDG through the ubiquitin-proteasome system and then maintain a TDG-free condition until G2. Incomplete degradation of ectopically expressed TDG impedes S-phase progression and cell proliferation. The mode of cell cycle regulation of TDG is strictly inverse to that of UNG2, which peaks in and throughout S-phase and then declines to undetectable levels until it appears again just before the next S-phase. Thus, TDG- and UNG2-dependent base excision repair alternates throughout the cell cycle, and the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway constitutes the underlying regulatory system.


Subject(s)
Cell Cycle , DNA Glycosylases/metabolism , DNA Repair , Thymine DNA Glycosylase/metabolism , Uracil-DNA Glycosidase/metabolism , Cell Line , Humans , Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex/metabolism , S Phase , Ubiquitin/metabolism
5.
Mol Cell ; 22(1): 51-62, 2006 Apr 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16600869

ABSTRACT

Alterations in DNA repair lead to genomic instability and higher risk of cancer. DNA base excision repair (BER) corrects damaged bases, apurinic sites, and single-strand DNA breaks. Here, a regulatory mechanism for DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) is described. Pol beta was found to form a complex with the protein arginine methyltransferase 6 (PRMT6) and was specifically methylated in vitro and in vivo. Methylation of Pol beta by PRMT6 strongly stimulated DNA polymerase activity by enhancing DNA binding and processivity, while single nucleotide insertion and dRP-lyase activity were not affected. Two residues, R83 and R152, were identified in Pol beta as the sites of methylation by PRMT6. Genetic complementation of Pol beta knockout cells with R83/152K mutant revealed the importance of these residues for the cellular resistance to DNA alkylating agent. Based on our findings, we propose that PRMT6 plays a role as a regulator of BER.


Subject(s)
Arginine/metabolism , DNA Methylation , DNA Polymerase beta/metabolism , Gene Expression Regulation , Nuclear Proteins/physiology , Protein-Arginine N-Methyltransferases/physiology , Animals , Arginine/chemistry , DNA Damage , DNA Ligases/physiology , DNA Polymerase beta/genetics , Embryo, Mammalian/cytology , Embryo, Mammalian/enzymology , Fibroblasts/cytology , Fibroblasts/enzymology , Genetic Complementation Test , Humans , Mice , Mice, Knockout
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...