Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Unfallchirurg ; 105(3): 188-98, 2002 Mar.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11995213

ABSTRACT

In the view of efficiency and cost effectiveness the increasing incidence of gunshot wounds in Europe demands a modification of treatment protocols. The general basis are debridement of soft tissue injuries, antibiotics and fracture stabilization. The pathology of gunshot wounds and established treatment algorhithms, however have to be adjusted to the ongoing development of gun technology and the thereby caused specific lesions. The treatment of injuries caused by high velocity projectiles necessitates a proactive surgical strategy. Small caliber gunshot wounds can be treated more conservatively. The following review presents an overview on the ballistic and surgical basis for the treatment of gunshot wounds of the musculoskeletal system.


Subject(s)
Arm Injuries/surgery , Leg Injuries/surgery , Wounds, Gunshot/surgery , Arm Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Critical Pathways , Firearms/classification , Humans , Leg Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Radiography , Spinal Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Injuries/surgery , Wounds, Gunshot/diagnostic imaging
2.
J Spinal Disord ; 14(4): 330-5, 2001 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11481555

ABSTRACT

The radiographic interpretation of sacroiliac screws relative to the S1 neuroforamen is difficult for orthopedic surgeons and radiologists. Computed tomography (CT) with axial images alone or combined with multiplanar reconstructions are often used to assess screw position. The reliability, reproducibility, and accuracy of orthopedist and radiologist interpretations of axial CT images with and without multiplanar reconstructions was determined using 24 cadaveric hemipelves with known sacroiliac screw position. Interobserver reliability of determining screw position was fair for orthopedists and slight for radiologists regardless of imaging modality or screw composition. Intraobserver reproducibility was moderate for orthopedists regardless of imaging modality or screw type. Reproducibility among radiologists was moderate using axial images of titanium screws and substantial with addition of multiplanar reconstructions. Overall accuracy was similar for orthopedists and radiologists. CT images with multiplanar reconstructions improve accuracy in determining sacroiliac screw position, but not significantly. Current imaging modalities are limited by large inaccuracies and by interobserver and intraobserver variation.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Sacroiliac Joint/diagnostic imaging , Sacroiliac Joint/surgery , Spinal Cord/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Male , Observer Variation , Orthopedic Procedures/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Technology, Radiologic/standards
4.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 23(5): 585-9, 1998 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9530790

ABSTRACT

STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-four cannulated sacroiliac screws were placed bilaterally into 12 cadaveric pelvi (12 titanium screws and 12 stainless-steel screws) and were imaged using conventional and multiplanar reconstructed computed tomography. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether sacroiliac screw position assessment relative to the neuroforamen is enhanced by: 1) computed tomography using multiplanar reconstructions and 2) the use of titanium screws rather than stainless-steel screws. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To the authors' knowledge, there have been no prior studies demonstrating the accuracy of multiplanar computed tomography compared with that of conventional (axial) tomography in determining the position of sacroiliac screws relative to the neuroforamen. Although titanium screws have been shown to have less scatter than stainless-steel screws, the effect of alloy composition on the radiographic accuracy of interpreting the screw position relative to the sacral neuroforamen is unknown. METHODS: Screws were deliberately placed into: position A, in which the screw did not violate the neuroforamen; position B, in which the threads of the screw came within 3 mm of the neuroforamen; and position C, in which the screw clearly was nearly centered in the neuroforamen. The degrees of accuracy in assessing screw position relative to the neuroforamen using conventional (axial) images and using multiplanar reconstructed images were compared. RESULTS: The axial images were accurate in determining screw position relative to the neuroforamen in 50% of cases in which titanium screws were used and in 42% of cases in which stainless-steel screws were used. The corresponding values for multiplanar reconstructions were 92% for cases in which titanium screws were used and 67% for cases in which stainless-steel screws were used. The accuracy of multiplanar reconstructions was statistically better than that of axial images (P < 0.05). Metallic scatter was increased in stainless-steel screws. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the use of computed tomography with multiplanar reconstruction improves accuracy in determining sacroiliac screw position relative to the neuroforamen. The assessment of screw position may be facilitated using titanium screws.


Subject(s)
Bone Screws , Pelvis/surgery , Sacroiliac Joint/surgery , Stainless Steel , Titanium , Aged , Cadaver , Female , Humans , Male , Materials Testing , Pelvis/diagnostic imaging , Sacroiliac Joint/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...