ABSTRACT
Ultrasound has become an essential tool in assisting critically ill patients. His knowledge, use and instruction requires a statement by scientific societies involved in its development and implementation. Our aim are to determine the use of the technique in intensive care medicine, clinical situations where its application is recommended, levels of knowledge, associated responsibility and learning process also implement the ultrasound technique as a common tool in all intensive care units, similar to the rest of european countries. The SEMICYUC's Working Group Cardiac Intensive Care and CPR establishes after literature review and scientific evidence, a consensus document which sets out the requirements for accreditation in ultrasound applied to the critically ill patient and how to acquire the necessary skills. Training and learning requires a structured process within the specialty. The SEMICYUC must agree to disclose this document, build relationships with other scientific societies and give legal cover through accreditation of the training units, training courses and different levels of training.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Critical Care , Health Personnel/education , Ultrasonography , HumansABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary hypertension (PHT) is an independent risk factor for right ventricular failure and death after heart transplant. Nitric oxide (NO) is a powerful and selective vasodilator, indicated in this scenario, but its response is unpredictable. Thus, it should be assessed prior to the intervention. However, preoperative assessment has not been widespread due to its difficulties and risks. OBJECTIVE: We describe herein a pulmonary vasodilatory test with NO administered through a noninvasive ventilation (NIMV) device. We also assessed the effect of NO in patients with severe PHT owing to cardiac disease. Assessment of the utility of the test to select patients for heart transplant. METHODS: We enrolled 19 patients with severe PHT for a preoperative assessment for heart transplant. Thresholds used were as follows: systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (SPAP) > or =65 mm Hg, transpulmonary gradient (TPG) > or =15 mm Hg, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > or =4.5 Wood units (WU). NO was administered through a modified noninvasive ventilation device. Cardiac output and pulmonary pressures were measured simultaneously by right heart catheterization. RESULTS: All patients agreed to be enrolled in the test. No difficulties, interruptions, or severe complications happened in any case. Basal and NO average measured values were SPAP (74.16 and 57.95 mm Hg), PVR (7.5 and 3.7 WU), and TPG (23.25 and 12.58 mm Hg). The differences were significant (P < .05) for all three tests. We consider acceptable for heart transplant a response that reduces PHT to a moderate grade. Using these criteria 14 patients were accepted and 11 underwent heart transplant. Two deaths in the postoperative period were both secondary to mediastinal bleeding and not related to right ventricular failure. CONCLUSIONS: A pulmonary vasodilatory test with NO administered through a NIMV device was feasible and useful to select suitable heart transplant recipients with severe pulmonary hypertension.
Subject(s)
Administration, Inhalation , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Heart Transplantation , Hypertension, Pulmonary/drug therapy , Nitric Oxide/administration & dosage , Patient Selection , Blood Pressure , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/complications , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Nitric Oxide/therapeutic use , Preoperative Care , Pulmonary Artery , Pulmonary Circulation , Vascular Resistance , Vasodilation/drug effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: HAV syndrome, the combination of hypotension, acidosis and vasodilation (HAV), is a serious postoperative complication after heart transplantation (HT). Its etiology and prognosis are poorly understood. AIM: To determine the incidence and prognosis of post-HT HAV syndrome and examine possible risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective examination of the records of 85 consecutive patients who underwent HT between December 1999 and June 2002 sought the HAV criteria: systolic BP <85 mm Hg plus HCO3 <19 mEq/l whole excluding cardiogenic, hypovolemic and septic shock. Donor variables included sex, age, weight, height, cause of death, time in ICU, and ischemic time; while recipient variables, sex, age, weight, height, etiology of cardiopathy, previous cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, preoperative amiodarone, beta-blockers, catecholamines, mechanical ventilation or intra aortic balloon pump (IABP), RVP, time on waiting list, pump time, reoperations, polytransfusion, preoperative creatinine, GOT, GPT and GGT, induction with OKT3 or anti-CD25, bypass-to-HAV time, duration of catecholamine treatment, and 1 month survival after HT. RESULTS: The 11 HAV cases (13%) appeared between 1 and 72 h after HT (75% in the first hour). Catecholamines were used for 1 to 6 days; control was achieved within 48 h in 58% of cases. Two HAV patients (18%) died within the first month versus six non-HAV patients (8.1%) (P=.275). Only polytransfusion showed more than a borderline value to predict HAV syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: HAV syndrome has an incidence of 13% and a mortality of 18% within 1 month post-HT. The only likely risk factor is polytransfusion.
