3D FEA of high-performance polyethylene fiber reinforced maxillary dentures.

OBJECTIVE: This project studies the effect of high-performance polyethylene (HPPE) fibers on stress distributions in a maxillary denture and the influence of fiber position on improving denture performance. METHODS: A denture was scanned with a 3D Advanced Topometric Sensor digitizing system. The measuring system converted the images into a 3D digital model. A 3D reverse engineering technology then produced a numerical model which was then refined with Rapidform software. The underlying mucosa and bone were constructed using a freeform system integrated with a PHANTOM haptic device. A fiber lamella reinforcement was incorporated into the denture at different positions (fitting side, mid-palatal plane, polished side) with SolidWorks software. Boundary conditions were constrained at the top of the basal bone while bite force of 230 N was applied to the posterior teeth on both sides. The denture models were analyzed with ABAQUS software. RESULTS: Stress concentrations were found at the incisal notch and at the anterior and posterior palatal surfaces of the unreinforced denture. The incorporated reinforcement effectively reduced the stress concentrations at these surfaces. Placement of the fibers at polished side was the best position in reducing stress concentrations. SIGNIFICANCE: 3D FEM usefully provides a non-laboratory means to reveal the weak areas in the maxillary complete denture, and exhibit the effectiveness of HPPE reinforcement together with fiber positions on enhancement of denture strength.

A comparison of 2D and 3D finite element analysis of a restored tooth.

The finite element method is widely used in dental research. The decision to use two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) modelling is dependent on many interrelated factors. The purpose of the present study was to compare and contrast 2D and 3D finite element analysis (FEA) in investigating the mechanical behaviour of a maxillary premolar restored with a full crown under similar conditions of axial and lateral occlusal loading. The 2D analysis required modelling both a buccolingual and mesiodistal section of the restored premolar and for comparison sections of a 3D model were examined. Differences in the results for displacement and maximum principal stress distribution within the component structures and interfaces of the 2D and 3D models were, in general, attributable to differences in geometry represented in the models. Maximum principal stresses tended to be greater under lateral rather than axial occlusal loading. It was concluded that 2D FEA may find application in investigating key aspects of the mechanical behaviour of a dental restoration in a single tooth unit, but that in certain situations combinations of 2D and 3D FEA may offer the best understanding of the biomechanical behaviour of complex dental structures. Sophisticated FE models are required to better understand the mechanical behaviour of restored tooth units.

Finite element analysis of fixed partial denture replacement.

The purpose of this study was to investigate, by means of the finite element method the mechanical behaviour of three designs of fixed partial denture (FPD) for the replacement of the maxillary first premolar in shortened dental arch therapy. Two-dimensional, linear, static finite element analyses were carried out to investigate the biomechanics of the FPDs and their supporting structures under different scenarios of occlusal loading. Displacement and stress distribution for each design of FPD were examined, with particular attention being paid to the stress variations along the retainer-abutment--and the periodontal ligament-bone interfaces. The results indicated that displacement and maximum principal stresses in the fixed-fixed, three-unit FPD were substantially less than those in the two-unit cantilever FPDs. Of the two cantilever FPDs investigated, the distal cantilever design was found to suffer less displacement and stresses than the mesial cantilever design under similar conditions of loading. The highest values for maximum principal stress in the cantilever FPDs were found within the connector between the pontic and the retainer, and within the periodontal ligament and adjacent bone on the aspect of the retainer away from the pontic.

Biomechanics of cantilever fixed partial dentures in shortened dental arch therapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to investigate, by means of 3-dimensional finite element analysis, aspects of the biomechanics of cantilever fixed partial dentures replacing the maxillary canine in shortened dental arch therapy. The null hypothesis was that no differences would be identified by finite element analysis in the mechanical behavior of the 2 designs of cantilever fixed partial denture under different scenarios of occlusal loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single- and double-abutted cantilever fixed partial dentures were modeled and analyzed using the finite element packages PATRAN and ABAQUS. Displacement and maximum principal stresses (magnitude and location) within the fixed partial dentures, supporting structures, and the periodontal ligament/bone and abutment/retainer interfaces were examined under 20 different scenarios of axial and lateral occlusal loading. RESULTS: The results indicate that more displacement occurred in the 2 rather than the 3-unit cantilever fixed partial denture, with the greatest displacement having occurred under lateral loading. The maximum principal stresses observed in the periodontal ligament/bone interfaces were greatest buccocervically, with the highest value being observed in the 2-unit fixed partial denture under lateral loading. The highest maximum principal stresses observed in the retainer/abutment interfaces were located cervically in relation to the distal margin of the retainer of the 2-unit fixed partial denture under axial loading. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that in adopting a cantilever fixed partial denture approach for the replacement of a missing maxillary canine in shortened dental arch therapy, there may be merits, in terms of mechanical behavior, in selecting a double-rather than a single-abutment design. Furthermore, prostheses' displacement and functional stresses may be minimized by reducing lateral loading and avoiding pontic only loading.