Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Trop Med Int Health ; 25(12): 1450-1466, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32985080

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the receipt of a diagnosis, referral and treatment for depression in people receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART), with depressive symptoms and attending primary care clinics in South Africa, and investigate factors associated with receiving these components of care. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial of an intervention intended to improve detection and treatment of depression in primary care patients receiving ART. In this analysis, we combined cross-sectional and longitudinal data from the intervention and control arms. Using regression models and adjusting for intra-cluster correlation of outcomes, we investigated associations between socioeconomic characteristics, depressive symptoms, stress, disability and stigma, and receipt of a diagnosis, referral and treatment for depression. RESULTS: Of 2002 participants enrolled, 18% reported a previous diagnosis of depression by a healthcare worker and 10% reported having received counselling from a specialist mental health worker. Diagnosis, referral and counselling during the follow-up period were appropriately targeted, being independently more frequent in participants with higher enrolment scores for depressive symptoms, stress or disability. Participants with higher stigma scores at enrolment were independently less likely to receive counselling. Severe socio-economic deprivation was common but was not associated with treatment. CONCLUSION: While the receipt of a diagnosis, referral and treatment for depression were uncommon, they seemed to be appropriately targeted. Socio-economic deprivation was not associated with treatment.


OBJECTIF: Décrire la réception d'un diagnostic, de l'orientation et du traitement pour la dépression chez les personnes recevant un traitement antirétroviral (ART), présentant des symptômes dépressifs et fréquentant des cliniques de soins primaires en Afrique du Sud, et étudier les facteurs associés à la réception de ces éléments de soins. MÉTHODES: Il s'agit ici d'une analyse secondaire des données d'un essai contrôlé randomisé d'une intervention destinée à améliorer la détection et le traitement de la dépression chez les patients sous ART dans les soins primaires. Dans cette analyse, nous avons combiné les données transversales et longitudinales des bras d'intervention et témoin. En utilisant des modèles de régression et en ajustant la corrélation intra-grappes des résultats, nous avons étudié les associations entre les caractéristiques sociodémographiques, les symptômes dépressifs, le stress, l'invalidité et la stigmatisation, et la réception d'un diagnostic, d'une orientation et d'un traitement pour la dépression. RÉSULTATS: Sur 2.002 participants inscrits, 18% ont déclaré un diagnostic antérieur de dépression par un agent de santé et 10% ont déclaré avoir reçu des conseils d'un agent spécialisé pour la santé mentale. Le diagnostic, l'orientation et le conseil pendant la période de suivi ont été ciblés de manière appropriée, étant indépendamment plus fréquents chez les participants ayant des scores d'inscription plus élevés pour les symptômes dépressifs, le stress ou l'invalidité. Les participants ayant des scores de stigmatisation plus élevés à l'inscription étaient indépendamment moins susceptibles de recevoir des conseils. La privation socioéconomique sévère était courante mais n'était pas associée au traitement. CONCLUSION: Bien que la réception d'un diagnostic, l'orientation et le traitement de la dépression soient rares, ils semblaient bien ciblés. La privation socioéconomique n'était pas associée au traitement.


Subject(s)
Depression/diagnosis , Depression/therapy , HIV Infections/psychology , Primary Health Care , Referral and Consultation , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Counseling , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Female , HIV Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Poverty , Social Stigma , South Africa/epidemiology
2.
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci ; 28(2): 199-209, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28805174

ABSTRACT

AIMS: There is convincing evidence that lower socioeconomic position is associated with increased risk of mental disorders. However, the mechanisms involved are not well understood. This study aims to elucidate the causal pathways between socioeconomic position and depression symptoms in South African adults. Two possible causal theories are examined: social causation, which suggests that poor socioeconomic conditions cause mental ill health; and social drift, which suggests that those with poor mental health are more likely to drift into poor socioeconomic circumstances. METHODS: The study used longitudinal and cross-sectional observational data on 3904 adults, from a randomised trial carried out in 38 primary health care clinics between 2011 and 2012. Structural equation models and counterfactual mediation analyses were used to examine causal pathways in two directions. First, we examined social causation pathways, with language (a proxy for racial or ethnic category) being treated as an exposure, while education, unemployment, income and depression were treated as sequential mediators and outcomes. Second, social drift was explored with depression treated as a potential influence on health-related quality of life, job loss and, finally, income. RESULTS: The results suggest that the effects of language on depression at baseline, and on changes in depression during follow-up, were mediated through education and income but not through unemployment. Adverse effects of unemployment and job loss on depression appeared to be mostly mediated through income. The effect of depression on decreasing income appeared to be mediated by job loss. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that both social causation and social selection processes operate concurrently. This raises the possibility that people could get trapped in a vicious cycle in which poor socioeconomic conditions lead to depression, which, in turn, can cause further damage to their economic prospects. This study also suggests that modifiable factors such as income, employment and treatable depression are suitable targets for intervention in the short to medium term, while in the longer term reducing inequalities in education will be necessary to address the deeply entrenched inequalities in South Africa.


Subject(s)
Chronic Disease/psychology , Cost of Illness , Depression/epidemiology , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Income/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life/psychology , Socioeconomic Factors , Unemployment/psychology , Adult , Chronic Disease/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , South Africa/epidemiology , Unemployment/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult
3.
S Afr Med J ; 106(12): 1241-1246, 2016 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27917771

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Low socioeconomic status is associated with the risk of hypertension. There are few reports of the effect of socioeconomic and potentially modifiable factors on the control of hypertension in South Africa (SA). OBJECTIVES: To investigate associations between patients' socio-economic status and characteristics of primary healthcare facilities, and control and treatment of blood pressure in hypertensive patients. METHODS: We enrolled hypertensive patients attending 38 public sector primary care clinics in the Western Cape, SA, in 2011, and followed them up 14 months later as part of a randomised controlled trial. Blood pressure was measured and prescriptions for antihypertension medications were recorded at baseline and follow-up. Logistic regression models assessed associations between patients' socioeconomic status, characteristics of primary healthcare facilities, and control and treatment of blood pressure. RESULTS: Blood pressure was uncontrolled in 60% (1 917/3 220) of patients at baseline, which was less likely in patients with a higher level of education (p=0.001) and in English compared with Afrikaans respondents (p=0.033). Treatment was intensified in 48% (892/1 872) of patients with uncontrolled blood pressure at baseline, which was more likely in patients with higher blood pressure at baseline (p<0.001), concurrent diabetes (p=0.013), more education (p=0.020), and those who attended clinics offering off-site drug supply (p=0.009), with a doctor every day (p=0.004), or with more nurses (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Patient and clinic factors influence blood pressure control and treatment in primary care clinics in SA. Potential modifiable factors include ensuring effective communication of health messages, providing convenient access to medications, and addressing staff shortages in primary care clinics.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...