Differences of biopsychosocial distress and requests for psychological assistance between Asian American and non-Hispanic White oncology patients.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare Asian American (AA) to non-Hispanic White (NHW) cancer patients regarding biopsychosocial distress and requests for psychological assistance. METHODS: This retrospective study included 5627 eligible patients, newly diagnosed with cancer, who completed the 30-item SupportScreen® survey of biopsychosocial distress. The top 10 sources of high distress were assessed. Distress domains (Emotional, Physical/Functional, and Practical) were examined by race/ethnicity. Requests for psychological assistance were also explored by ethnic groups. RESULTS: Overall, the top 10 sources of high distress were similar between groups and approximately half consisted of concerns regarding physical symptoms. All patients preferred "talking" as their method of receiving assistance for these items. Ratings of emotional, practical, and physical/functional distress were similar between AA and NHW patients. However, AAs (vs. NHWs) requested more assistance regarding physical/functional and practical distress. No difference was observed between these two groups regarding requests for emotional support. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, our study suggests that healthcare providers should be aware of the physical and practical needs of AA cancer patients and provide culturally sensitive care that addresses these needs.

Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology, Version 2.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology focuses on considerations for the comprehensive care of AYA patients with cancer. Compared with older adults with cancer, AYA patients have unique needs regarding treatment, fertility counseling, psychosocial and behavioral issues, and supportive care services. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology addresses additional aspects of caring for AYA patients, including risk factors, screening, diagnosis, and survivorship.

Reduction of Distress and Attrition in a 6-Week Psychoeducational Group: A Pilot Study.

Purpose: The distress and unique needs of AYAs (adolescent/young adults) with an oncology diagnosis have been well explored and documented in the literature. However, effective means of reducing distress and meeting needs has been more elusive. This study explored the impact of a 6-week psychoeducational pilot group on AYA distress. Methods: Patient surveys and literature review were conducted to develop content for a 6-week psychoeducational group to reduce AYA distress through peer support and increased knowledge related to symptom management, physician communication, body image, family relationships, autonomy, sexuality, fertility, and coping skills. Distress was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results: Twenty-one AYAs receiving oncology treatment enrolled in the group. Thirteen completed the program. Reasons for attrition included transportation, severity of symptoms, procedures, disinterest, and death. A correlated t-test demonstrated a significant decrease in HADS total score from pre- to post-test. Conclusion: This pilot study suggests that providing AYAs with information relative to their unique developmental needs and opportunities to process those needs in an environment of peers is challenging but can have benefit. nCT01817335.

Threshold score for the self-report Pediatric Distress Thermometer Rating Scale in childhood cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: Although there is enthusiasm for identifying and treating psychosocial problems in childhood cancer patients, there are few validated instruments to help providers identify at-risk children for further assessment. The study objective was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the self-report pediatric Distress Thermometer Rating Scale (Peds DTRS) in childhood cancer survivors and identify a threshold score to help providers classify pediatric patients. METHODS: We evaluated 54 children 7-17 years old using 178 Peds DTRS longitudinal data points from the cohort that was used for the original pediatric adaptation of the DTRS. We compared Peds DTRS scores against two established standardized measures using a generalized linear mixed model to deal with the dependency in the longitudinal data to estimate ROC curves and related statistics. RESULTS: Results indicate that a score of 3 is a reasonable cutoff to identify distress with children 7-17 years old. This cutoff yielded high sensitivity (87.0%) and specificity (79.7%) using the PedsQL Emotional Domain score as the standard. Similar results were obtained using the CDI as the standard, but we are cautious as very few CDI scores reached the cutoff criterion. Exploratory analysis highlighted clinical factors that correlate with increased distress measured using the Peds DTRS. CONCLUSIONS: The Peds DTRS is a very brief, convenient, and rapid screening tool for global distress in children. Further investigation of the Peds DTRS and other tools can improve the ability of providers to prevent and treat the negative emotional consequences of cancer and improve the quality of survivorship.

Biopsychosocial Distress in Young Adult Oncology Patients: Examining Sex Differences in Sources of High Distress and Requests for Assistance.

PURPOSE: This study examines biopsychosocial problem-related distress and requests for assistance with male and female young adult patients by applying a large-scale analysis among individuals diagnosed with a variety of cancers. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted involving 630 patients of ages 18-39 treated for cancer at City of Hope between 2009 and 2014. Patients were asked to complete a biopsychosocial problem-related distress touch-screen instrument before treatment as part of their routine clinical care. RESULTS: Overall, male patients rated more biopsychosocial problems as highly distressing than female patients. Some problems were consistently endorsed as highly distressing to both male and female patients. In fact, six of the top seven highly distressing problems for each sex were similar: finances, fatigue, sleeping, side effects of treatment, pain, and feeling anxious or fearful. There were differences in the ways male and female patients preferred to ask for assistance from the medical team, as males more often preferred to speak with someone, whereas females more often preferred to receive written information. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that sex may have a significant relationship with biopsychosocial topics of distress, likelihood of reporting distress, and preferred methods of receiving assistance. Tailoring information and resources to specific areas of distress may reduce high distress with common problems (such as finances, treatment side effects, and infertility.).

Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology, Version 2.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology focuses on treatment and management considerations for AYA patients with cancer. Compared with older adults with cancer, AYA patients have unique needs regarding treatment, fertility counseling, psychosocial and behavioral issues, and supportive care services. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for AYA Oncology addresses additional aspects of caring for AYA patients, including risk factors, screening, diagnosis, and survivorship.