Dermoid cyst management and outcomes: a review of over 1000 cases at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Mature cystic teratomas represent nearly 60% of benign ovarian neoplasms across all age groups. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to update existing descriptive studies of ovarian teratomas, including the epidemiology, rate of torsion or malignancy, and treatment modalities in a large modern cohort of patients. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of all pathology-confirmed cases of ovarian teratoma that underwent surgery at 1 tertiary care institution from 2004 to 2015. Patient demographics, ovarian cyst characteristics, surgical approach and timing, rate of spillage, and surgical complications were examined. RESULTS: A total of 1054 cases of ovarian teratoma were identified during the study period. There were 113 cases (10.7%) of bilateral teratoma. The mean age at diagnosis was 38 years. The average cyst size was 6.26 cm. The overall rate of torsion was 5.6%, with a higher rate of torsion with increasing cyst size. More than 70% of cases were treated with minimally invasive surgery, which was associated with decreased perioperative complications but an increased risk of cyst spillage. Among 394 patients with cyst spillage, only 1 patient developed chemical peritonitis. The malignant transformation rate of mature cystic teratoma in this cohort was 1.1%. This cohort included 100 pregnant women with mature teratoma. Pregnant patients were more likely to have minimally invasive surgery in the first trimester of pregnancy and more likely to undergo laparotomy in the second or third trimester of pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Similar rates of bilaterality, torsion, malignant transformation, and struma ovarii in ovarian teratomas were found in this large modern cohort compared with previous literature. Most cases of ovarian teratoma can be managed laparoscopically, which is associated with a lower surgical complication rate. Despite the increased risk of cyst spillage with a minimally invasive approach, chemical peritonitis is a rare complication.

The activity advantage: Objective measurement of preoperative activity is associated with postoperative recovery and outcomes in patients undergoing surgery with gynecologic oncologists.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between objectively-measured preoperative physical activity with postoperative outcomes and recovery milestones in patients undergoing gynecologic oncology surgeries. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of patients undergoing surgery with gynecologic oncologists who wore wearable actigraphy rings before and after surgery from 03/2021-11/2023. Exposures encompassed preoperative activity intensity (moderate- and vigorous-intensity metabolic equivalent of task-minutes [MAVI MET-mins] over seven days) and level (average daily steps over seven days). Intensity was categorized as <500, 500-1000, and >1000 MAVI MET-mins; level categorized as <8000 and ≥8000 steps/day. Primary outcome was 30-day complications. Secondary outcomes included reaching postoperative goal (≥70% of recommended preoperative intensity and level thresholds) and return to baseline (≥70% of individual preoperative intensity and level). RESULTS: Among 96 enrolled, 87 met inclusion criteria, which constituted 39% (n = 34) with <500 MET-mins and 56.3% (n = 49) with <8000 steps preoperatively. Those with <500 MET-mins and <8000 steps had higher ECOG scores (p = 0.042 & 0.037) and BMI (p = 0.049 & 0.002) vs those with higher activity; all other perioperative characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 29.9% experienced a 30-day complication, 29.9% reached postoperative goal, and 64.4% returned to baseline. On multivariable models, higher activity was associated with lower odds of complications: 500-1000 MET-mins (OR = 0.26,95%CI = 0.07-0.92) and >1000 MET-mins (OR = 0.25,95%CI = 0.07-0.94) vs <500 MET-mins; ≥8000 steps (OR = 0.25,95%CI = 0.08-0.73) vs <8000 steps. Higher preoperative activity was associated fewer days to reach postoperative goal. CONCLUSION: Patients with high preoperative activity are associated with fewer postoperative complications and faster attainment of recovery milestones. Physical activity may be considered a modifiable risk factor for adverse postoperative outcomes.

Low serum creatinine levels are associated with major post-operative complications in patients undergoing surgery with gynecologic oncologists.

OBJECTIVE: Serum creatinine is a byproduct of muscle metabolism, and low creatinine is postulated to be associated with diminished muscle mass. This study examined the association between low pre-operative serum creatinine and post-operative outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the 2014-2021 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to identify patients undergoing surgery with gynecologic oncologists. Patients with missing pre-operative creatinine, end-stage renal disease, sepsis, septic shock, dialysis, or pregnancy were excluded. Pre-operative creatinine was categorized into markedly low (≤0.44 mg/dL), mildly low (0.45-0.64 mg/dL), normal (0.65-0.84 mg/dL), and four categories of elevated levels (0.85-1.04, 1.05-1.24, 1.25-1.44, and ≥1.45 mg/dL). Outcomes included major (≥Grade 3) 30-day complications, categorized into any complications, wound, cardiovascular and pulmonary, renal, infectious, and thromboembolic complications. Also examined were 30-day readmissions, reoperations, and mortality. Logistic regressions assessed the association between creatinine and complications, with stratification by albumin and sensitivity analysis with propensity score matching. RESULTS: Among 84 786 patients, 0.8% had markedly low, 19.6% mildly low, and 50.2% normal creatinine; the remainder had elevated creatinine. As creatinine decreased, the risks of major complications increased in a dose-dependent manner on univariable and multivariable analyses. A total of 9.6% (n=63) markedly low patients experienced major complications, second to creatinine ≥1.45 mg/dL (9.9%, n=141). On multivariable models, both markedly and mildly low creatinine were associated with higher odds of major complications (OR 1.715, 95% CI 1.299 to 2.264 and OR 1.093, 95% CI 1.001 to 1.193) and infections (OR 1.575, 95% CI 1.118 to 2.218 and OR 1.165, 95% CI 1.048 to 1.296) versus normal. Markedly low creatinine had similar ORs to creatinine ≥1.45 mg/dL and was further associated with higher odds of cardiovascular and pulmonary complications (OR 2.301, 95% CI 1.300 to 4.071), readmissions (OR 1.403, 95% CI 1.045 to 1.884), and mortality (OR 2.718, 95% CI 1.050 to 7.031). After albumin stratification, associations persisted for markedly low creatinine. Propensity-weighted analyses demonstrated congruent findings. CONCLUSIONS: Low creatinine levels are associated with major post-operative complications in gynecologic oncology in a dose-dependent manner. Low creatinine can offer useful information for pre-operative risk stratification, surgical counseling, and peri-operative management.

Shifting trends and sicker patients: Reassessing hysterectomy performed for benign indications by gynecologic oncologists.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends and differences in patient characteristics, complications, and distributions of hysterectomy for benign indications by benign gynecologists (BG) and gynecologic oncologists (GO). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data from 2014 to 2021. Exclusions were made for gynecologic or disseminated cancers, ascites, non-gynecologic surgeons, and cesarean hysterectomies. Primary outcome was major (≥Grade 3) 30-day complications, categorized into any complications, wound, cardiovascular and pulmonary, renal, infectious, andthromboembolic complications. Thirty-day readmissions, reoperations, and mortality were also analyzed. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 match of GO to BG patients and was compared. Linear regressions assessed trends. RESULTS: Among 198,767 patients, 18% (n = 37,707) underwent hysterectomy for benign indications with GO. GO patients exhibited more risk factors for complications and differed significantly from BG patients in comorbidities and perioperative characteristics. Overall, GO patients had higher major complication rates (3.1% vs 2.2%, p < 0.001) and for several other composite complications. After matching, compared to BG, GO-performed hysterectomies had similar rates of major complications (3.0% vs 3.0%, p = 0.55) and no differences in other composite complications, except fewer reoperations (1.2 % vs 1.5%, p < 0.01) and wound complications (0.4% vs 0.5%, p = 0.02) in GO patients. Over the eight years, the percentage of GO-performed hysterectomy (ß = 0.41, R2 = 0.71,p < 0.01) increased significantly whereas BG-performed surgeries decreased by the same magnitude. BG had a significant decrease in frail patients (ß = -0.47, R2 = 0.90, p < 0.01), but GO did not (ß = -0.36, R2 = 0.38, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: GO are performing more hysterectomies for benign indications on higher-risk patients. However, on a matched cohort, risks of major complications were similar between GO and BG.

Transcending Language Barriers in Obstetrics and Gynecology: A Critical Dimension for Health Equity.

There is growing evidence that language discordance between patients and their health care teams negatively affects quality of care, experience of care, and health outcomes, yet there is limited guidance on best practices for advancing equitable care for patients who have language barriers within obstetrics and gynecology. In this commentary, we present two cases of language-discordant care and a framework for addressing language as a critical lens for health inequities in obstetrics and gynecology, which includes a variety of clinical settings such as labor and delivery, perioperative care, outpatient clinics, and inpatient services, as well as sensitivity around reproductive health topics. The proposed framework explores drivers of language-related inequities at the clinician, health system, and societal level. We end with actionable recommendations for enhancing equitable care for patients experiencing language barriers. Because language and communication barriers undergird other structural drivers of inequities in reproductive health outcomes, we urge obstetrician-gynecologists to prioritize improving care for patients experiencing language barriers.

Characterization of pre-operative anemia in patients undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist and association with post-operative complications.

OBJECTIVE: Anemia is prevalent in patients with gynecologic cancers and is associated with increased peri-operative morbidity. We aimed to characterize risk factors for pre-operative anemia and describe outcomes among patients undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist to identify potential areas for impactful intervention. METHODS: We analyzed major surgical cases performed by a gynecologic oncologist in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database from 2014 to 2019. Anemia was defined as hematocrit <36%. Demographic characteristics and peri-operative variables for patients with and without anemia were compared using bivariable tests. Odds of peri-operative complications in patients stratified by pre-operative anemia were calculated using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among 60 017 patients undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist, 23.1% had pre-operative anemia. Women with ovarian cancer had the highest rate of pre-operative anemia at 39.7%. Patients with advanced-stage cancer had a higher risk of anemia than early-stage disease (42.0% vs 16.3%, p≤0.001). In a logistic regression model adjusting for potential demographic, cancer-related, and surgical confounders, patients with pre-operative anemia had increased odds of infectious complications (odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.26), thromboembolic complications (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.68), and blood transfusion (OR 5.78, 95% CI 5.34 to 6.26). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of anemia in patients undergoing surgery by a gynecologic oncologist, particularly those with ovarian cancer and/or advanced malignancy. Pre-operative anemia is associated with increased odds of peri-operative complications. Interventions designed to screen for and treat anemia in this population have the potential for significant impact on surgical outcomes.

Potential impact of hospital at home on postoperative readmissions.

OBJECTIVES: Hospital at home (HAH) is a health care delivery model that substitutes hospital-level services in the home for inpatient hospitalizations. HAH has been shown to be safe and effective for medical patients but has not been investigated in surgical readmissions. We estimated the potential impact of an HAH program for patients readmitted within 60 days postoperatively and described the characteristics of eligible patients to aid in the design of future programs. STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study of 60-day postoperative readmissions at a tertiary care center in 2018. METHODS: We identified the number of readmissions that may have been eligible for HAH, collected descriptive information, and estimated the financial margin that could have been generated had eligible readmissions been diverted to HAH. RESULTS: There were 2366 readmissions within 60 days of surgery in 2018. A total of 731 readmissions met inclusion criteria for HAH (30.1%), accounting for 4152 bed days. Of these readmissions, the most common diagnoses were infection, gastrointestinal complications, and cardiac complications. Patients' home addresses were within 16 miles of the hospital in 447 cases (61.1%). Avoidance of these readmissions and use of the beds for new admissions represented a potential backfill margin of $8.8 million, not incorporating the cost of HAH. CONCLUSIONS: Many 60-day postoperative readmissions may be amenable to HAH enrollment, representing a significant opportunity to improve patient experience and generate hospital revenue. This is of particular interest in the post-COVID-19 era. To maximize their impact, HAH programs should tailor clinical and operational services to this population.

Next-Generation Sequencing in the Diagnosis of Metastatic Lesions: Reclassification of a Glioblastoma as an Endometrial Cancer Metastasis to the Brain.

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in the U.S., but metastasis to the brain is rare, and diagnosis can be challenging. Traditional tools for determining if a tumor is a primary or metastatic lesion include pan-imaging, histopathologic studies, and immunohistochemistry. Molecular testing with next-generation sequencing has been increasingly used to augment these tests. We present a case of a patient who initially presented with a brain lesion diagnosed as glioblastoma on histology and immunohistochemistry, but whose diagnosis was later changed to metastasis from an endometrial primary based on molecular findings. The two tumors shared a common microsatellite instability signature and 51 DNA variants, including oncogenic driver mutations KRAS p.G13D, PIK3CA p.E545A, and PTEN p.I135V and p.K267Rfs*9. This highlights the power of molecular analysis in making the diagnosis in cases of rare metastases. KEY POINTS: Brain metastasis from endometrial primary is rare, and histopathological features may be augmented with molecular analysis to aid in diagnosis. Comparison of the molecular makeup of the primary endometrial lesion with the metastatic lesion may reveal high-risk molecular features that may be indicative of metastatic potential.

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols improve time to return to intended oncology treatment following interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced gynecologic cancers.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is associated with earlier return to intended oncology treatment following interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced gynecologic cancers. METHODS: Participants comprised consecutive patients (n=278) with a preoperative diagnosis of stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer, divided into those that received treatment before versus after implementation of an ERAS protocol at our institution. All patients received at least three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a platinum based regimen and underwent interval cytoreduction via laparotomy with the intent to deliver additional cycles of chemotherapy postoperatively. The primary outcome was defined as the timely return to intended oncologic treatment, defined as the percentage of patients initiating adjuvant chemotherapy within 28 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The study cohorts included 150 pre-ERAS patients and 128 post-ERAS patients. Median age was 65 years (range 58-71). Most patients (211; 75.9%) had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3, and the median operative time was 174 min (range 137-219). Median length of stay was 4 days (range 3-5 days) in the pre-ERAS cohort versus 3 days (range 3-4) in the post-ERAS cohort (p<0.0001). At 28 days after operation, 80% of patients had resumed chemotherapy in the post-ERAS cohort compared with 64% in the pre-ERAS cohort (odds ratio (OR) 2.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36 to 3.84; p=0.002). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the ERAS protocol was the strongest predictor of timely return to intended oncology treatment (OR 10.18, 95% CI 5.35 to 20.32). CONCLUSION: An ERAS protocol for gynecologic oncology patients undergoing interval cytoreductive surgery is associated with earlier resumption of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Endometrial Cancer Tumor Pathology.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a well-established risk factor for endometrial cancer and is thought to adversely affect outcomes. The impact of significant and sustained weight loss as achieved by bariatric surgery for women with endometrial cancer is not well understood. METHODS: We performed an institutional retrospective review of patients who underwent bariatric surgery and were diagnosed with premalignant or malignant uterine disease from 1989 to 2019 (n=171). We compared tumor characteristics and cancer-specific outcomes in patients diagnosed with uterine disease before ("PRE" group) or after ("POST" group) undergoing bariatric surgery and in a BMI- and age-matched cohort who did not undergo bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Of the 171 patients, 120 were in the PRE group and 51 in the POST group. The POST group was more likely to have adenocarcinoma (68.6 vs 45.0%, p=0.012) and more likely to have a minimally invasive hysterectomy (80.9 vs 46.2%, p<0.001). Post-bariatric surgery weight loss was similar between the two groups. In women with malignant disease, tumor grade and pathology were similar in the PRE and POST groups. The 5-year overall survival was 98% in the PRE group and 77.8% in the POST group (p=0.016). However, 5-year overall survival was statistically similar in both PRE and POST groups compared to a matched cohort who did not undergo bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we did not detect an impact of bariatric surgery on endometrial cancer pathology or disease survival. Larger, multi-center studies are needed to investigate the relationship between bariatric surgery status and cancer outcomes.

Women's decision making for postpartum sterilization: does the Medicaid waiting period add value?

OBJECTIVES: Currently, patients with federally funded insurance are required to sign a sterilization consent form (SCF) at least 30 days prior to sterilization, while privately insured patients are not. Although this policy was designed to protect the reproductive rights of vulnerable populations, it has had the unintended effect of creating a disparity in access to an effective contraceptive method. Our qualitative study aims to clarify the decision-making process surrounding postpartum sterilization and assess if patients perceive that the SCF adds value. STUDY DESIGN: We interviewed 25 women who underwent postpartum sterilization procedures, 10 with private insurance and 15 with Medicaid. Topics discussed included reproductive history, reason for choosing sterilization, decision-making timeline and value of the SCF. We transcribed and coded the interviews and identified themes. RESULTS: Participant responses indicated that decision-making processes were similar between patients with private insurance and those with Medicaid. For most women, the decision to undergo sterilization took place over the course of their reproductive lives. Participants expressed that nonbiased provider counseling, autonomy and information from other women were helpful to their decision making. Most subjects felt that the SCF might benefit other women but did not/would not affect their own decision making. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence suggesting that women with private insurance and women with Medicaid should be subjected to disparate restrictions on sterilization based on differences in decision-making processes. Characteristics of the decision-making process that women value, which in this population did not include the SCF, should be prioritized. IMPLICATIONS: Given the potential negative consequences associated with the SCF including its disproportionate burden on women of low socioeconomic status, the lack of value added to the decision-making process for postpartum sterilization reported by our participants provides further evidence for reevaluation of the policy.

Intraoperative Radiation Therapy in the Management of Gynecologic Malignancies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to review the experience with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) in the treatment of gynecologic cancers at the Massachusetts General Hospital. METHODS: From January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2011, 32 patients were treated with IORT at Massachusetts General Hospital. Hospital, pathology, and office medical records and radiation oncology records were reviewed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate disease-free survival and overall survival (OS) data. RESULTS: In 27 patients (84.4), surgical resection margins were microscopically positive. In 5 patients (15.6%), margins were grossly positive. For patients with microscopic disease, 5-year disease-free survival was 40.9% (57 mo), compared with 9.1% (23 mo) for those with gross residual disease (P=0.001). Five-year OS was also statistically improved for patients with microscopic residual disease, when compared with OS among patients with gross residual disease, 77.3% (93 mo) and 54.5% (40 mo), respectively (P=0.001). The risk of distant metastases in patients with gross residual disease was 87%, compared with 28% in patients with microscopic disease (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Volume of residual disease before IORT is an important prognostic indicator. Local recurrence and distant metastases were more common among patients with gross residual disease left in situ at time of IORT. Our institutional experience with IORT further supports the importance of complete surgical resection.

Effect of Educational Intervention on Cervical Cancer Prevention and Screening in Hispanic Women.

To evaluate the effect of an educational intervention on four domains of health care utilization and cervical cancer prevention and screening in a Hispanic population. Data collected from a survey were used to design education strategies focused on four domains of interest. A second survey was conducted to measure the impact of the intervention. Following the intervention, respondents were more likely to have any knowledge of human papillomavirus (HPV). Respondents living in the United States (US) for <5 years were more likely to have had a Papanicolaou smear in the preceding 3 years (p = 0.0314), to report knowledge of HPV vaccination (p = 0.0258), and to be willing to vaccinate themselves (p = 0.0124) and their children (p = 0.0341) after the intervention. Educational interventions designed to meet the needs identified by the sample group led to an increase in HPV awareness throughout the entire population surveyed and an increase in health care service utilization and HPV vaccine acceptance for women living in the US for <5 years. These tools should be promoted to reduce the cervical cancer burden on vulnerable populations.

Trends in Treatment of Uterine Serous Cancer in the Medicare Population.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the rates of chemotherapy and radiotherapy delivery in the treatment of uterine serous carcinoma in the Medicare population and to compare clinical outcomes in treated and untreated patients. METHODS: The linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results and Medicare databases were queried to identify patients with a diagnosis of uterine serous carcinoma between 1992 and 2009. The impact of chemotherapy on survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors predictive of outcome were compared using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 2188 patients met study eligibility criteria. Stages I, II, III, and IV diseases accounted for 890 (41%), 174 (8%), 470 (21%), and 654 (30%) of the study population, respectively. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, both, or none, were administered as adjuvant therapy in 635 (29%), 536 (24%), 308 (14%), and 709 (32%) of the study population, respectively. Use of chemotherapy became more frequent over time. Over the study period, and after adjusting for race, time of diagnosis, SEER registry, marital status, stage, age, surgery, lymph node dissection, socioeconomic status, and comorbidity index, there was an association between receipt of radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.04-1.67) and not receiving any treatment (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.01) and worst survival. Survival was not improved over time. CONCLUSION: Although adjuvant chemotherapy and combination treatment with chemotherapy and radiation were associated with improved survival in our model, there was no significant improvement in survival over time.

Trends in the treatment of uterine leiomyosarcoma in the Medicare population.

OBJECTIVE: Uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is a relatively rare malignancy that is associated with a poor prognosis. The rarity of LMS has led to a lack of consensus regarding appropriate treatment. The goal of this study was to identify the role that chemotherapy and radiotherapy have played in the treatment of uterine LMS in the United States as well as the effectiveness of adjuvant treatment. MATERIALS/METHODS: We used the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results)-Medicare database to gather information on uterine LMS patients older than the age of 66 years diagnosed between 1992 and 2009. Basic demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. A logistic regression model analysis was performed to determine predictors of treatment. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify clinical parameters and treatment strategies associated with survival differences. RESULTS: Our final study group included 230 patients. We found that the rate of use of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in the treatment of patients with uterine LMS increased over the period investigated. However, we identified no significant survival advantage associated with either mode of therapy. The strongest predictor of survival was stage at diagnosis. The logistic regression model analysis revealed that age at diagnosis, treatment year, stage, and underlying health status were all independent predictors of chemotherapy. Age at diagnosis was also a predictor of radiation therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The increasing rates of chemotherapy and radiotherapy use in this population seem to be unfounded given the lack of survival benefit. Further investigation into alternative treatment regimens is merited. The prognostic significance of stage at diagnosis indicates the importance of improving early detection of uterine LMS.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer compared with fallopian tube cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and survival between patients with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer and fallopian tube cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We identified women with stage I epithelial ovarian cancer and fallopian tube cancer who underwent treatment from 2000-2010. Correlation between categoric variables was assessed with χ2 test. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to generate overall survival data. Factors predictive of outcome were compared with the use of the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: The study group consisted of 385 women with epithelial ovarian cancer and 43 women with fallopian tube cancer. Patients with fallopian tube cancer had a higher rate of stage IA disease (65% vs 48%; P=.02) and grade 3 tumors (60.4% vs 30.9%; P<.001). Patients with fallopian tube cancer had a significantly higher rate of breast cancer (25.6% vs 5.7%; P<.001) and BRCA 1 mutations (45.8% vs 9.1%; P<.001). There was no difference in the rates of platinum-based and paclitaxel chemotherapy between the groups. Women with fallopian tube cancer were more likely to have received ≥6 cycles of chemotherapy (58.1% vs 44.1%; P=.02). The 5-year disease-free survival rates were 100% in women with fallopian tube cancer and 93% in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (P=.04). The 5-year overall survival rates were 100% and 95% for fallopian tube cancer and epithelial ovarian cancer, respectively (P=.7). CONCLUSION: We found a higher rate of stage IA, grade 3, and serous carcinoma in fallopian tube cancer. Women with fallopian tube cancer had a higher rate of breast cancer. There was no difference in overall survival between the groups.

Recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: an update on treatment.

An estimated 85% of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who achieve a full remission following first-line therapy will develop recurrent disease. Although each subsequent line of therapy is characterized by shorter disease-free intervals, median survival for these patients ranges from 12 months to 24 months. Emerging therapies in the management of ovarian cancer have resulted in a shift in paradigm, including in the appropriate time to institute therapy, and in the selection of therapy. This review focuses on chemotherapy and emerging biologic agents that present a therapeutic option for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

The role of intraoperative radiation therapy in the management of recurrent and locally advanced gynecologic cancers.

For patients with locally advanced primary or recurrent gynecologic cancers, prognosis is poor. Doses of external beam radiation therapy required to treat either gross or microscopic disease in patients previously irradiated or treated surgically exceed doses that are tolerated by normal anatomic structures. Intraoperative radiation therapy allows maximal tumor control achievable with radiation while minimizing radiation exposure of dose-limiting surrounding structures. Intraoperative radiation therapy is a unique treatment modality, allowing direct visualization of the target volume during a planned surgical procedure. Intraoperative radiation therapy has the potential to improve both long-term local control and overall survival especially in patients with para-aortic and/or pelvic sidewall recurrences.